Discussion:
Democrats Propose Mandatory Free Speech Buyback For Dangerous Ideas
Add Reply
Ted
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
I have to say, this is a damn good idea. Hate speech is a threat to our
freedoms, and the less of it, the better. We will not have a truly free
society until all dangerous speech is banned.

https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-propose-mandatory-free-speech-buyback-for-dangerous-ideas

U.S.—A number of Democratic candidates have seized on a new initiative to
make Americans feel safer: a mandatory buyback. “There are a number of
ideas out there that just make people upset when they’re said out loud,”
said presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke. “It’s time to take those ideas
off the street. That’s why it’s past time for a mandatory free speech
buyback.”

The idea that the government can take away people’s rights if it just
compensates people for them has a long history as a thing that Democrats
have proposed but not thought too deeply about. The current proposal is to
force any Americans who have scary ideas, like that there are only two
genders or that climate change isn’t a serious crisis, to sell those ideas
to the government at a fair market price so they are then no longer able to
express those views. The government will also force the sale of dangerous
media, such as making Netflix sell them the new Dave Chapelle comedy
special so it can be destroyed.

“These are ideas that serve no purpose, and we need to get them out of
public use,” stated Elizabeth Warren. “Some people may be upset, but they
shouldn’t be, because we’re paying them for their stupid ideas. Also, we’re
buying back being able to call me Pocahontas. No one needs that.”

Many have come out in opposition to this idea, such as President Trump, who
says people can take his dangerous speech from his “cold, dead mouth.” It’s
also unclear how much the government will pay to buy back free speech, but
Democrats have noted that the going rate is a penny for one’s thoughts.
Clave
2019-10-03 21:36:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea. Hate speech is a threat to our
freedoms, and the less of it, the better. We will not have a truly free
society until all dangerous speech is banned.
Gray? When did you start posting as Ted?

Anyway, good to hear from you again.
Post by Ted
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-propose-mandatory-free-speech-buyback-for-dangerous-ideas
U.S.—A number of Democratic candidates have seized on a new initiative to
make Americans feel safer: a mandatory buyback. “There are a number of
ideas out there that just make people upset when they’re said out loud,”
said presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke. “It’s time to take those ideas
off the street. That’s why it’s past time for a mandatory free speech
buyback.”
The idea that the government can take away people’s rights if it just
compensates people for them has a long history as a thing that Democrats
have proposed but not thought too deeply about. The current proposal is to
force any Americans who have scary ideas, like that there are only two
genders or that climate change isn’t a serious crisis, to sell those ideas
to the government at a fair market price so they are then no longer able to
express those views. The government will also force the sale of dangerous
media, such as making Netflix sell them the new Dave Chapelle comedy
special so it can be destroyed.
“These are ideas that serve no purpose, and we need to get them out of
public use,” stated Elizabeth Warren. “Some people may be upset, but they
shouldn’t be, because we’re paying them for their stupid ideas. Also, we’re
buying back being able to call me Pocahontas. No one needs that.”
Many have come out in opposition to this idea, such as President Trump, who
says people can take his dangerous speech from his “cold, dead mouth.” It’s
also unclear how much the government will pay to buy back free speech, but
Democrats have noted that the going rate is a penny for one’s thoughts.
Ted
2019-10-03 23:02:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:36:11 -0700, Clave
Post by Clave
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea. Hate speech is a threat to our
freedoms, and the less of it, the better. We will not have a
truly free
Post by Clave
Post by Ted
society until all dangerous speech is banned.
Gray? When did you start posting as Ted?
LOL! Well, guns, dangerous speech, privacy, etc., all must be banned
for freedom's sake.
Post by Clave
Anyway, good to hear from you again.
Thanks Clave.
BeamMeUpScotty
2019-10-03 22:44:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea. Hate speech is a threat to our
freedoms, and the less of it, the better. We will not have a truly free
society until all dangerous speech is banned.
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-propose-mandatory-free-speech-buyback-for-dangerous-ideas
U.S.—A number of Democratic candidates have seized on a new initiative to
make Americans feel safer: a mandatory buyback. “There are a number of
ideas out there that just make people upset when they’re said out loud,”
said presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke. “It’s time to take those ideas
off the street. That’s why it’s past time for a mandatory free speech
buyback.”
The idea that the government can take away people’s rights if it just
compensates people for them has a long history as a thing that Democrats
have proposed but not thought too deeply about. The current proposal is to
force any Americans who have scary ideas, like that there are only two
genders or that climate change isn’t a serious crisis, to sell those ideas
to the government at a fair market price so they are then no longer able to
express those views. The government will also force the sale of dangerous
media, such as making Netflix sell them the new Dave Chapelle comedy
special so it can be destroyed.
“These are ideas that serve no purpose, and we need to get them out of
public use,” stated Elizabeth Warren. “Some people may be upset, but they
shouldn’t be, because we’re paying them for their stupid ideas. Also, we’re
buying back being able to call me Pocahontas. No one needs that.”
Many have come out in opposition to this idea, such as President Trump, who
says people can take his dangerous speech from his “cold, dead mouth.” It’s
also unclear how much the government will pay to buy back free speech, but
Democrats have noted that the going rate is a penny for one’s thoughts.
After this we could also buy back people's religions RIGHTS and create a
secular society.

I have to jab a sharp stick in the eye of all the ignorant Democrats and
Marxists out there who want to confiscate guns and call it a "buy back"/

No one can sell their RIGHTS, they can agree NOT to use them but they
can't get rid of their rights..... that take teh ratification of an
amendment to the Constitution. That means a gun buy back is NOT
reducing guns just using tax dollars to illegally try to confiscate the
RIGHTS of AMERICANS.
--
That's Karma
Klaus Schadenfreude
2019-10-03 23:35:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for slave
reparations.
Ted
2019-10-05 14:50:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for slave
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First Amendment.
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African
Americans.
BeamMeUpScotty
2019-10-05 15:33:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for slave
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First Amendment. It
was written by slave holders and intended to repress African Americans.
Anyone who has a Rap Song DVD should go to a Buy-Back site and get
reparations for their purchase of that HATE FILLED speech that oppresses
and objectifies women. All radio stations that have those should sell
them back to the Government that created them because those people that
wrote those didn't create that, they don't own that and neither do you.

All words belong to the Government and you just use them with the
permission of the Government. ;)
--
That's Karma
default
2019-10-05 15:42:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for slave
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First Amendment.
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African
Americans.
Dog Turd has already proposed this once or twice now, of course in his
opinion (the only opinion that matters) he should determine what
speech is to be restricted.

Can you imagine what that would be like?
Klaus Schadenfreude
2019-10-05 15:46:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by default
Post by Ted
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for slave
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First Amendment.
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African
Americans.
Dog Turd has already proposed this once or twice now, of course in his
opinion (the only opinion that matters) he should determine what
speech is to be restricted.
Can you imagine what that would be like?
Oh, you mean Dianne Feinstein? Or Christopher Wray?
default
2019-10-05 17:54:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:46:01 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by default
Post by Ted
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for slave
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First Amendment.
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African
Americans.
Dog Turd has already proposed this once or twice now, of course in his
opinion (the only opinion that matters) he should determine what
speech is to be restricted.
Can you imagine what that would be like?
Oh, you mean Dianne Feinstein? Or Christopher Wray?
I don't know what others you mention are about. DT would likely make
it a crime to say anything critical about him. Seems to me that some
religious nutters want to make it a crime to criticize religion or at
least the religion they subscribe to.
Siri Cruise
2019-10-05 18:15:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by default
I don't know what others you mention are about. DT would likely make
it a crime to say anything critical about him. Seems to me that some
How stalinist of him.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
Ted
2019-10-07 23:48:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by default
Post by Ted
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for slave
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First
Amendment.
Post by default
Post by Ted
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African
Americans.
Dog Turd has already proposed this once or twice now, of course in his
opinion (the only opinion that matters) he should determine what
speech is to be restricted.
Can you imagine what that would be like?
LOL. True. What a dork.
BeamMeUpScotty
2019-10-08 14:27:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by default
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for
slave
Post by default
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First
Amendment.
Post by default
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African
Americans.
Dog Turd has already proposed this once or twice now, of course in
his
Post by default
opinion (the only opinion that matters)  he should determine what
speech is to be restricted.
Can you imagine what that would be like?
LOL. True. What a dork.
And all you have to do is use a black sharpie and redact all words and
ideas that are not acceptable to the Commi-D'crat Party line.

Take the book to the official government BUY-BACK site and get your
dollars for the words you *REDACTED* .

If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the BUY-BACK
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party erasing
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head. You need
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for thinking the
wrong way.
--
That's Karma
Ted
2019-10-08 22:15:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:27:17 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
On Sat, 05 Oct 2019 11:42:33 -0400, default
Post by default
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money for
slave
Post by default
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First
Amendment.
Post by default
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African
Americans.
Dog Turd has already proposed this once or twice now, of course in
his
Post by default
opinion (the only opinion that matters)  he should determine what
speech is to be restricted.
Can you imagine what that would be like?
LOL. True. What a dork.
And all you have to do is use a black sharpie and redact all words and
ideas that are not acceptable to the Commi-D'crat Party line.
Take the book to the official government BUY-BACK site and get your
dollars for the words you *REDACTED* .
If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the
BUY-BACK
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party
erasing
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head. You need
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for
thinking the
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
wrong way.
You're guilty of hate speech, Beamie. I oughtta report you to the FBI.
dolf
2019-10-08 22:32:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Report them to the FBI?

And so ends the MAXIM that only community minded American is the one
looting after a hurricane
Post by Ted
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:27:17 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the
BUY-BACK
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party
erasing
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head.  You
need
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for
thinking the
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
wrong way.
You're guilty of hate speech, Beamie. I oughtta report you to the FBI.
— BORIS RUMOURED TO BE PROPOSING A SAPIENT ECONOMY #339 -
INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT AS #82 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE (#339 - PROROGUING CRYSTALLISATION /
CAUTERISATION OF 13 TO 17 SEPTEMBER 2019) TO ENSURE THE EUROPEAN UNION
DOESN’T DANCE THE IRISH JIG UPON OUR ARMISTICE WAR GRAVES

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 8 October 2019

POLITICAL EDITOR ANDREW WOODCOCK (INDEPENDENT) @ 2335 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER
2019: "COMMONS SPEAKER’S POWERS COULD BE CURBED IF TORIES WIN ELECTION
MAJORITY, MINISTER SUGGESTS:

The government could institute a review of the powers of the speaker of
the Commons if Conservatives win a majority at the next election, a
senior minister has suggested.

The current speaker, John Bercow, has infuriated the government with a
series of rulings, which have thrown obstacles in the way of Brexit.

Most significantly, he has allowed emergency motions under a Commons
rule known as Standing Order 24 (SO24) to be used to let MPs seize
control of the business of the house to push through legislation
limiting the PM’s room for manoeuvre.

Mr Bercow has allowed SO24 to be used to force binding votes, in a move
away from the convention that debate on emergency motions ends with a
“neutral” division stating simply that the house has considered the issue.

An SO24 motion was used to push through legislation forcing Theresa May
to seek an extension to Brexit talks in the spring, and the tactic was
employed again to facilitate the so-called Benn Act, which requires
Boris Johnson to ask for another delay if he fails to secure a deal with
parliamentary support within the next two weeks.

Mr Bercow – who many Brexiteers believe is a committed opponent of EU
withdrawal – has also permitted the use of the formerly little-known
procedure of a “*HUMBLE* *ADDRESS*” to the Queen to enable opposition
parties to force the release of secret government documents.

And he has massively increased the number of urgent questions taken in
the Commons, forcing ministers to the despatch box to face lengthy
grillings on Brexit policy.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the minister told The Independent it
was time to consider imposing constraints on the speaker’s discretion to
interpret the rules of parliament.

“Parliament has a rulebook and it has conventions about its procedures
that have developed over a long period for a very good reason,” said the
minister.

“You can’t have someone in that position *GETTING* *UP* *IN* *THE*
*MORNING* *AND* *DECIDING* *THAT* *HE* *IS* *GOING* *TO* *DO* *THINGS*
*DIFFERENTLY* *AND* *BEND* *THE* *RULES* as he wishes.""
[<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/speaker-powers-commons-review-election-conservative-john-bercow-a9143191.html>]

Nous: #38
Time: 05:10 hrs
Date: 2019.6.8
Torah: [#40, #8, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40),
@2: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#88); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#48),
@3: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER
{%15}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#58),
Male: #146; Feme: #58
} // #58

Dao: Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra: #11 - Divergence
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing

Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {

1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}


Solar Eclipse: 8 (UTC) / 9 June 1918 (AEST) [During World War I: 28 July
1914 to 11 November 1918]

#175 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#409 / #413} / HETEROS {#395 / #406} / TORAH {#422
/ #379}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:2,nous:38&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 2, nous: 38 [Date: 2019.6.8, Time: 05:10
hrs, Super: #409 / #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release, Ego: #413 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{524}>

ONTIC CHECKSUM: @157 + @181 + @186 = #524 as [#6, #8, #200, #300, #10] =
chârâsh (H2796): {UMBRA: #13 as #508 % #41 = #16} 1) *CRAFTSMAN*,
*ARTISAN*, *ENGRAVER*, *GRAVER*, *ARTIFICER*; 1a) graver, artificer; 1b)
*SKILFUL* *TO* *DESTROY* (*WARRIORS*) (fig.);

#524 as [#10, #3, #200, #300, #6, #5] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #2 as
#503 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE*
*AWAY*, *DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST*
*UP*; 1a) (Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away,
be tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust
out;

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGES: @ (TOP LEFT) 1058 HOURS ON 17 MARCH 2017: FUNERAL RIGHTS AND
CELEBRATING THE DEATH OF A STATE AS PLAQUE INSTALLATION @ (TOP RIGHT)
1510 HOURS ON 8 JUNE 2017 {#413 as [#1, #30, #10, #300, #2, #70] =
ʼĔlîyshebaʻ (H472): {UMBRA: #4 as #413 % #41 = #3} 0) Elisheba = 'my God
has sworn' or 'God is an oath'; 1) Aaron's wife; *ELIZABETH*} BY A
CONTRIVED SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE IMPOSITION OBSERVED @ 1153 HOURS
ON 10 JUNE 2017 (SHOWN BOTTOM LEFT / RIGHT) BEING MADE UPON THE BOER WAR
MEMORIAL ESTABLISHED 29 OCTOBER 1909 / RE-SITED 25 APRIL 1972 AS THE
ONLY SUBJECTIVE MEMORIAL OCCASION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN ABNORMAL BOER
WAR MEMORIAL #390 - WREATH PLACEMENT last upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and #312
- WITHERED STATE REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018]

DOLF @ 2358 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2019: "CAN WE EXPECT SOME PROGRESS ON
NORTH KOREAN INTEROPERABILITY?

ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @228 + @175 = #553 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #700]
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;

#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;

#553 as [#5, #30, #10, #200, #1, #2, #5, #300] = Elisábet (G1665):
{UMBRA: #25 as #553 % #41 = #20} 0) Elisabeth = 'oath of God'; 1) the
wife of Zacharias and mother of John the Baptist, of the priestly
family, and a relative of Mary, [Luke 1:36]

#533 as [#30, #3, #200, #300] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #5 as #503 % #41
= #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE* *AWAY*,
*DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST* *UP*; 1a)
(Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away, be
tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust out;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{553}>

HELSINKI ON 5 OCTOBER 2019: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said
Saturday teams from North Korea [DPRK] and the United States have
arrived in the Swedish capital Stockholm to resume discussions on
Pyongyang’s nuclear program.
[<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/north-korea-us-resume-nuclear-diplomacy-with-sweden-talks/2019/10/05/9b300c72-e765-11e9-b0a6-3d03721b85ef_story.html>]

[D, {@1: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4)},
P, {@2: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#78); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#74)},
R, {@3: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#80); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU
(#83)},
K] {@4: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego:
20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE
PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

What is the likelihood of favourable progress upon an interoperability
{@175, #328, #339, #369, #434, (#424?)} agreement with North Korea and
the lifting of acute sanctions which might then have a ripple effect on
China / Hong Kong tensions that by comparison seems to be spiralling
into violence and lawlessness?

What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.

Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.

There are more than [7.5] billion people in the world today, and though
we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.

But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER:

+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]

When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).

Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]

AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
    C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
    O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
    R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
    A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
    L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES (THIRD SECTION) AS IDEAS @B102 / @B103 /
@A78: "[IDEA @B102 / @A76] General logic (as has already been said
several times) abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits
representations to be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may
be, so that, proceeding analytically, it can first transform these
representations into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a
manifold of sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental
aesthetic offers to it in order to provide material [IDEA @A77] for the
pure concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without
any content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a
manifold of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless be- long to
the conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone
representations of objects can be received, and which must therefore
ever affect the concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought
demands that the manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined
in a specific manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call
this act synthesis.

By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
[IDEA @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another,
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
specific content; it is therefore the first [IDEA @A78] thing to which
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.

Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.

The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
[IDEA @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., the *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT

This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']

Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
the sake [IDEA @A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [Pages 164 to 166]

G4160@{
   @1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80),
   @2: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#149); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE
(#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   @3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES
{%40}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#160),
   @4: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#231); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#165),
   @5: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#244); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #244; Feme: #175
} // #175

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#25); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#84 - I AM NOT
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#48); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#61); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#175
- I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] / #328 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8,
#20, #5, #50] / #339 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #5, #50, #1,
#10] / #369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
#434 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #5, #10, #1, #50] = poiéō (G4160):
{UMBRA: #42 as #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one
anything; 1g1) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *CONSTITUTE* *OR* *APPOINT* *ONE*
*ANYTHING*, *TO* *APPOINT* *OR* *ORDAIN* *ONE* *THAT*; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE*
ie.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors
of a thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do
well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to
do to one; 2c) *WITH* *DESIGNATION* *OF* *TIME*: to pass, spend; 2d) to
celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME*
*TO* *INSTITUTE*, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a
promise;

"THEN JOSEPH {INCREASE; ADDITION} BEING RAISED FROM SLEEP DID-G4160 AS
THE #246 - ANGEL OF THE LORD HAD BIDDEN HIM, AND TOOK UNTO HIM HIS
WIFE:" [Matthew 1:24]

Interoperability imply open standards AB INITIO which is a Latin term
meaning "from the beginning" and is derived from the Latin ab ("from") +
initio, ablative singular of initium ("beginning").

THUS THIS PROVISIONAL (I am reliant upon the expertise of others)
PROTOTYPE CAN BE THE BASIS FOR AN INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT:

{@175, #328, #339, #369, #434, (#424?)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{175}&idea:{328}&idea:{339}&idea:{369}&idea:{434}>

With the #SIXTH being subject to arbitrary requirements.

AND WHEREAS WE DID ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1900: by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain POWERS, FUNCTIONS, and AUTHORITIES were
declared to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We are
desirous of making effectual and permanent provision for the office of
Governor General and Commander in chief in and over Our said
Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on each
demise of the said office. Now know ye that We have thought fit to
*CONSTITUTE*, *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, *AND* *DO* *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, that there shall be a
Governor General and Commander in Chief (hereinafter called the Governor
General) in and over Our Commonwealth of Australia (hereinafter called
Our said Commonwealth), and that the person who shall fill the said
office of Governor General shall be FROM *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED*
by Commission under Our Sign Manual and Signet.
[<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Queen%20Victoria%27s%20Letters%20Patent%201900.pdf>]


<Loading Image...>

AS THEN THE EXPRESSION OF THE #390 - SOVEREIGN'S *RESERVE* (APODIDOMI
v's DIDOMI) RIGHT IN DEPLOYING THE #45 - HETERO SQUARE SPIROGYRA ORDER
ARRAY BEING CONSISTENT WITH THE USAGE WITHIN THE GENERAL #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PROTOTYPE:

#1 + #2 + #3 = @6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: the
people of @1 - New South Wales, @2 - Victoria, @3 - South Australia, @4
- Queensland, and @5 - Tasmania and also @6 - Western Australia, should
be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia

#8 + #9 + #4 = @21 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE {LIABILITY}: We do hereby reserve
to Ourselves Our heirs and successors, full power and authority from
*TIME* *TO* *TIME* to revoke, alter, or amend these Our Letters Patent
as to Us or them shall seem meet.

#7 + #6 + #5 = @18 - FORM OF NATURE: And whereas by “The Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act 1900,” it is amongst other things enacted,
that we may authorise the Governor General to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to exercise, during the
pleasure of the Governor General such powers, and functions of the said
Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies,
subject to any limitations expressed or directions given by Us: Now We
do hereby authorise and empower Our said Governor General subject to
such limitations and directions as aforesaid, to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, such of his powers and functions, as he
may deem it necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided
always, that the appointment of such a Deputy or Deputies shall not
affect the exercise by the Governor General himself of any power or
function.

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 REPRESENTED BY A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL TRINOMIAL
NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND IN MY POSSESSION UPON ANZAC DAY
PANTOMIME '#492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL' PROTEST AND ARREST OF 25 APRIL 2006]

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #40 - REVERSAL, AVOIDING
ACTIVITY; I-CHING: H36 - SUPPRESSION OF THE LIGHT, SINKING / DARKENING
LIGHT, BRILLIANCE INJURED, INTELLIGENCE HIDDEN; TETRA: 68 - DIMMING as
IDEA: @328: “Without a solution to this question reason will never be
satisfied with itself. The use in experience to which reason limits the
pure understanding does not entirely fulfill reason’s own vocation.

Each individual experience is only a part of the whole sphere of the
domain of experience, but the absolute totality of all possible
experience is not itself an experience, and yet is still a necessary
problem for reason, for the mere representation of which reason needs
concepts entirely different from the pure concepts of the understanding,
whose use is only immanent, i.e., refers to experience insofar as such
experience can be given, whereas the concepts of reason extend to the
completeness, i.e., the collective unity of the whole of possible
experience, and in that way exceed any given experience and become
transcendent.

Hence, just as the understanding needed the categories for experience,
reason contains in itself the basis for ideas, by which I mean necessary
concepts whose object nevertheless cannot be given in any experience.

The latter are just as intrinsic to the nature of reason as are the
former to that of the understanding; and if the ideas carry with them an
illusion that can easily mislead, this illusion is inevitable, although
it can very well be prevented “from leading us astray.”

Since all illusion consists in taking the subjective basis for a
judgment to be objective, pure reason’s knowledge of itself in its
transcendent (overreaching) use will be the only prevention against the
errors into which reason falls if it misconstrues its vocation and, in
transcendent fashion, refers to the object in itself that which concerns
only its own subject and the guidance of that subject in every use that
is immanent.” [page 80]

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #51 - NATURAL GUIDES AND
NURSING VIRTUOSITY; I-CHING: H47 - OPPRESSION (EXHAUSTION), CONFINING,
ENTANGLED; TETRA: 69 - EXHAUSTION as IDEA: @339: “In the first place,
the usefulness of a system of categories is here revealed so clearly and
unmistakably that even if there were no further grounds of proof of that
system, this alone would sufficiently establish their indispensability
in the system of pure reason. There are no more than four such
transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories; in each
of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of the
series of conditions for a given conditioned.

In accordance with these cosmological ideas there are also only four
kinds of dialectical assertions of pure reason, which show themselves to
be dialectical because for each such assertion a contradictory one
stands in opposition in accordance with equally plausible principles of
pure reason, a conflict that cannot be avoided by any metaphysical art
of the most subtle distinctions, but that requires the philosopher to
return to the first sources of pure reason itself. This antinomy, by no
means arbitrarily contrived, but grounded in the nature of human reason
and so inevitable and never ending, contains the following four theses
together with their antitheses.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @1 = #175 as precedent of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>

THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).

ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @2 = #328 as #287 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY

THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @3 = #339 - BINOMIAL STASIS / TRINOMIAL
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY

THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.

ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @4 = #369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR FOR
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS

THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent. ” [pages 90 to 91]

Nous: #25
Time: 12:50 hrs
Date: 2019.10.6
Torah: [#50, #40, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#50); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#50),
@2: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#59); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#90),
@3: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#108); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#130 - I
AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #108; Feme: #130
} // #130

Dao: What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious
Tetra: #10 - Defectiveness, Distortion
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing

Latin: Advitor {Infinitely good God} Alt: Rah'el {Friend of God} {

1. PROTECTS AGAINST ACCIDENTS, MAINTAINS HEALTH & HEALS
2. TRADE & BUSINESSMEN
3. BUSINESS
4. Asau
}


Solar Eclipse: 3 (UTC) / 4 February 1916 (AEST) [During World War I: 28
July 1914 to 11 November 1918]

#111 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#307 / #479} / HETEROS {#334 / #452} / TORAH {#334
/ #452}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:9,nous:25&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

GREG HEFFER (SKY NEWS) @ 2229 HOURS ON 8 OCTOBER 2019: "BREXIT DEAL
'OVERWHELMINGLY UNLIKELY,' ANGELA MERKEL TELLS BORIS JOHNSON"

The prime minister spoke with Ms Merkel for 30 minutes this morning,
with Mr Johnson stressing that Brexit negotiations in Brussels "are
close to breaking down", Number 10 said.

The government last week unveiled its proposals for a renegotiated
Brexit deal, with the prime minister hoping this can be agreed before
the current 31 October deadline.

During the call, Mr Johnson was said to have told Ms Merkel the plans -
which would ditch the controversial Irish border backstop arrangement -
represented a "reasonable offer", but that it was not apparent to him
"there was any desire for negotiation from the EU".

Reacting to Number 10's account of the discussion, European Council
President Donald Tusk warned Mr Johnson that "what's at stake is not
winning some stupid blame game".

In a tweet directed at the prime minister, Mr Tusk said: "At stake is
the future of Europe and the UK as well as the security and interests of
our people. You don't want a deal, you don't want an extension, you
don't want to revoke, quo vadis? (Latin for "Where are you going?")"

YOUTUBE: "Male Irish Jig"



DOLF @ 2229 HOURS ON 8 OCTOBER 2019: "It would seem to me that the
ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis of ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign dynamic
is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT so it is little wonder
then that the German Chancellor Angela MERKEL has become objectionable
in stating that a BREXIT deal is 'overwhelmingly unlikely'."

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>

Initial Post: 6 October 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-10-09 07:42:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
It's a MAXIM:

[the, {@1: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#11); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
(#51)},

only, {@2: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#85); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#81)},

community, {@3: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#153); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION:
CHENG (#106)},

minded, {@4: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#212); Ego: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG
(#137)},

American, {@5: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#240); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI
(#174)},

is, {@6: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#305); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#202)},

the, {@7: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#381); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
(#253)},

one, {@8: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#397); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#287)},

looting, {@9: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#476); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE:
CH'A (#298)},

after, {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#547); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
(#357)},

a, {@11: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#619); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#358)},

hurricane] {@12: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#646); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE
(#428: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)},

THESIS: The world has a beginning in time and is, as regards space, also
enclosed in boundaries

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @1 = #175 as precedent of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>

THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).

ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.

For, if one assumes that the world has no beginning in time: then up to
any given point in time an eternity has transpired and therefore in the
world an infinite series of successive states of things has gone by. But
the infinity of a series consists, however, in the very fact that it can
never be completed through successive synthesis. Therefore an infinitely
flowing world-series is impossible, and so a beginning to the world is a
necessary condition of its existence; which was the first thing to be
proven. As regards the second part, one again assumes the opposite: then
the world will be an infinite, given whole of simultaneously existing
things. Now the magnitude of a quantum that is not given within the
specific boundaries of any intuition ∗ cannot be thought in any other
manner except through the synthesis of parts, and the totality of such a
quantum only through the completed synthesis, or through repeated
addition of unity to itself. ∗∗ Accordingly, in order for the world,
which fills up all of space, to be thought as a whole, the successive
synthesis of the parts of an infinite world would have to be considered
as completed, i.e., in counting through all coexisting things an
infinite time would have to be considered as having transpired; which is
impossible. Accordingly, an infinite aggregate of actual things cannot
be regarded as a whole that is given, and hence not as a who l e that is
simultaneously given. Consequently the world is, with respect to
extension in space, not infinite , but is enclosed in its boundaries;
which was the second thing to be proven. . . . [page 192 to 193]


On 9/10/19 5:31 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul wrote:> On Wednesday,
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
And so ends the MAXIM that [the] only community minded American is
the one
Post by dolf
looting after a hurricane
A "maxim" is something everydody both*understands*, and, understands
is*true*.
Your gibberish meets neither requirement, therefore is not a "maxim".
Maybe you could create your own words to describe your gibberish.,
instead of stealing real words that already have meanings?
For 50% of what you write, you could start with the first 3 letters
of the word you are contemplating misappropriating, and then completing
the word with additional letters that give a more accurate picture of
what your thinking?
The remaining 50% could similarly use the last 3 letters with an
appropriate prefix replacing the rest?

That if the the ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis to ROMAN
EMPIRE GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign
dynamic is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT {ie. #1080 -
HETEROS NUMBER} then all it requires is a substantiation {ie.

#38 + #73 + #111 + #117 = 3 x #111 + #6 = #339 as [#300, #30, #9] =
shᵉlêṭ (H7981): {UMBRA: #27 as #339 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *HAVE* *POWER*,
*RULE*, *DOMINEER*, *RULE* *OVER*; 1a) (P'al) *HAVE* *POWER* *UPON* *OR*
*OVER*, *RULE*, *FALL* *UPON*, *ASSAULT*, *BE* *RULER*; 1b) (Aphel)
*MAKE* *RULER*;

*TRIFECTA* of Harvest / Micro Full Moon on Friday 13 September 2019 with
peak @ 0432 hours UTC on Saturday 14 September 2019

As another term for EXĀCTUS (LATIN: feminine exācta, neuter exāctum,
comparative exāctior)

1) driven out, expelled, having been driven out
2) demanded, required, enforced, exacted, having been demanded
3) weighed, having been weighed
4) determined, found out, ascertained, having been determined
a) (by extension) precise, exact, accurate
5) endured, undergone, having been endured
6) (of time) spent, passed, having been spent
7) concluded, finished, completed, having been finished

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#315 / #392} / HETEROS {#265 / #367} / TORAH {#199
/ #415}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:5,col:5,nous:41&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#424 / #238} / HETEROS {#396 / #305} / TORAH {#342
/ #278}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:8,nous:14&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

} of a logical capacity by the necessity of TRINOMIAL / BINOMIAL
INTEROPERABILITY {@175, #328, #339, #369, #434, (#424?)} with the
provision of a #491 - RULE {PATER FAMILIAS PRINCIPLE / #82 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY} + #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {LETTERS PATENT / #205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE} SAPIENT ECONOMY {#1364 / 4 = #341}
#339 - INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT BY #81 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE:

ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @228 + @175 = #553 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #700]
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;

#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;

#339 as [#30, #1, #8, #200, #50, #10, #600] = ʼachărôwn (H314): {UMBRA:
#0 as #265 % #41 = #19} 1) behind, following, subsequent, *WESTERN*; 1a)
behind, hindermost, western (of location); 1b) later, subsequent,
latter, *LAST* (*OF* *TIME*);

#341 as [#1, #60, #80, #200] = çâphar (H5608): {UMBRA: #25 as #340 % #41
= #12} 1) to count, recount, relate; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to count (things);
1a2) to *NUMBER*, take account of, reckon; 1b) (Niphal) to be counted,
be numbered; 1c) (Piel) to recount, rehearse, declare; 1c1) to recount
(something), rehearse; 1c2) to talk; 1c3) to count exactly or
accurately; 1d) (Pual) to be recounted, be rehearsed, be related; 2)
enumerator, muster-officer, secretary, scribe; 2a) enumerator,
muster-officer, *SECRETARY*; 2b) learned man, scribe;

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @1 = #175 as precedent of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>

THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).

ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @2 = #328 as #287 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY

THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @3 = #339 - BINOMIAL STASIS / TRINOMIAL
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY

THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.

ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @4 = #369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR FOR
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS

THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>

Initial Post: 9 October 2019
Report them to the FBI?
And so ends the MAXIM that only community minded American is the one
looting after a hurricane
Post by dolf
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:27:17 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the
BUY-BACK
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party
erasing
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head.  You
need
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for
thinking the
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
wrong way.
You're guilty of hate speech, Beamie. I oughtta report you to the FBI.
— BORIS RUMOURED TO BE PROPOSING A SAPIENT ECONOMY #339 -
INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT AS #82 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE (#339 - PROROGUING CRYSTALLISATION /
CAUTERISATION OF 13 TO 17 SEPTEMBER 2019) TO ENSURE THE EUROPEAN UNION
DOESN’T DANCE THE IRISH JIG UPON OUR ARMISTICE WAR GRAVES
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 8 October 2019
2019: "COMMONS SPEAKER’S POWERS COULD BE CURBED IF TORIES WIN ELECTION
The government could institute a review of the powers of the speaker of
the Commons if Conservatives win a majority at the next election, a
senior minister has suggested.
The current speaker, John Bercow, has infuriated the government with a
series of rulings, which have thrown obstacles in the way of Brexit.
Most significantly, he has allowed emergency motions under a Commons
rule known as Standing Order 24 (SO24) to be used to let MPs seize
control of the business of the house to push through legislation
limiting the PM’s room for manoeuvre.
Mr Bercow has allowed SO24 to be used to force binding votes, in a move
away from the convention that debate on emergency motions ends with a
“neutral” division stating simply that the house has considered the issue.
An SO24 motion was used to push through legislation forcing Theresa May
to seek an extension to Brexit talks in the spring, and the tactic was
employed again to facilitate the so-called Benn Act, which requires
Boris Johnson to ask for another delay if he fails to secure a deal with
parliamentary support within the next two weeks.
Mr Bercow – who many Brexiteers believe is a committed opponent of EU
withdrawal – has also permitted the use of the formerly little-known
procedure of a “*HUMBLE* *ADDRESS*” to the Queen to enable opposition
parties to force the release of secret government documents.
And he has massively increased the number of urgent questions taken in
the Commons, forcing ministers to the despatch box to face lengthy
grillings on Brexit policy.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the minister told The Independent it
was time to consider imposing constraints on the speaker’s discretion to
interpret the rules of parliament.
“Parliament has a rulebook and it has conventions about its procedures
that have developed over a long period for a very good reason,” said the
minister.
“You can’t have someone in that position *GETTING* *UP* *IN* *THE*
*MORNING* *AND* *DECIDING* *THAT* *HE* *IS* *GOING* *TO* *DO* *THINGS*
*DIFFERENTLY* *AND* *BEND* *THE* *RULES* as he wishes.""
[<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/speaker-powers-commons-review-election-conservative-john-bercow-a9143191.html>]
Nous: #38
Time: 05:10 hrs
Date: 2019.6.8
{%15}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#58),
   Male: #146; Feme: #58
} // #58
Dao: Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra: #11 - Divergence
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}
Solar Eclipse: 8 (UTC) / 9 June 1918 (AEST) [During World War I: 28 July
1914 to 11 November 1918]
#175 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#409 / #413} / HETEROS {#395 / #406} / TORAH {#422
/ #379}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:2,nous:38&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
hrs, Super: #409 / #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release, Ego: #413 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{524}>
chârâsh (H2796): {UMBRA: #13 as #508 % #41 = #16} 1) *CRAFTSMAN*,
*ARTISAN*, *ENGRAVER*, *GRAVER*, *ARTIFICER*; 1a) graver, artificer; 1b)
*SKILFUL* *TO* *DESTROY* (*WARRIORS*) (fig.);
#524 as [#10, #3, #200, #300, #6, #5] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #2 as
#503 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE*
*AWAY*, *DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST*
*UP*; 1a) (Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away,
be tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust
out;
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Janet.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/OATH%2020170608%201510%20-%202.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%201.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%204.jpg>
1510 HOURS ON 8 JUNE 2017 {#413 as [#1, #30, #10, #300, #2, #70] =
ʼĔlîyshebaʻ (H472): {UMBRA: #4 as #413 % #41 = #3} 0) Elisheba = 'my God
has sworn' or 'God is an oath'; 1) Aaron's wife; *ELIZABETH*}  BY A
ON 10 JUNE 2017 (SHOWN BOTTOM LEFT / RIGHT) BEING MADE UPON THE BOER WAR
MEMORIAL ESTABLISHED 29 OCTOBER 1909 / RE-SITED 25 APRIL 1972 AS THE
ONLY SUBJECTIVE MEMORIAL OCCASION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN ABNORMAL BOER
WAR MEMORIAL #390 - WREATH PLACEMENT last upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and #312
- WITHERED STATE REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018]
NORTH KOREAN INTEROPERABILITY?
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;
#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;
{UMBRA: #25 as #553 % #41 = #20} 0) Elisabeth = 'oath of God'; 1) the
wife of Zacharias and mother of John the Baptist, of the priestly
family, and a relative of Mary, [Luke 1:36]
#533 as [#30, #3, #200, #300] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #5 as #503 % #41
= #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE* *AWAY*,
*DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST* *UP*; 1a)
(Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away, be
tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust out;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{553}>
HELSINKI ON 5 OCTOBER 2019: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said
Saturday teams from North Korea [DPRK] and the United States have
arrived in the Swedish capital Stockholm to resume discussions on
Pyongyang’s nuclear program.
[<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/north-korea-us-resume-nuclear-diplomacy-with-sweden-talks/2019/10/05/9b300c72-e765-11e9-b0a6-3d03721b85ef_story.html>]
(#83)},
20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE
PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
What is the likelihood of favourable progress upon an interoperability
the lifting of acute sanctions which might then have a ripple effect on
China / Hong Kong tensions that by comparison seems to be spiralling
into violence and lawlessness?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than [7.5] billion people in the world today, and though
we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>
[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
@A78: "[IDEA @B102 / @A76] General logic (as has already been said
several times) abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits
representations to be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may
be, so that, proceeding analytically, it can first transform these
representations into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a
manifold of sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental
pure concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without
any content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a
manifold of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless be- long to
the conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone
representations of objects can be received, and which must therefore
ever affect the concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought
demands that the manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined
in a specific manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call
this act synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., the *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [Pages 164 to 166]
(#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
{%40}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#160),
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #244; Feme: #175
} // #175
UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
- I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] / #328 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8,
#20, #5, #50] / #339 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #5, #50, #1,
#10] / #369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
{UMBRA: #42 as #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one
anything; 1g1) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *CONSTITUTE* *OR* *APPOINT* *ONE*
*ANYTHING*, *TO* *APPOINT* *OR* *ORDAIN* *ONE* *THAT*; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE*
ie.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors
of a thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do
well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to
do to one; 2c) *WITH* *DESIGNATION* *OF* *TIME*: to pass, spend; 2d) to
celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME*
*TO* *INSTITUTE*, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a
promise;
"THEN JOSEPH {INCREASE; ADDITION} BEING RAISED FROM SLEEP DID-G4160 AS
THE #246 - ANGEL OF THE LORD HAD BIDDEN HIM, AND TOOK UNTO HIM HIS
WIFE:" [Matthew 1:24]
Interoperability imply open standards AB INITIO which is a Latin term
meaning "from the beginning" and is derived from the Latin ab ("from") +
initio, ablative singular of initium ("beginning").
THUS THIS PROVISIONAL (I am reliant upon the expertise of others)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{175}&idea:{328}&idea:{339}&idea:{369}&idea:{434}>
With the #SIXTH being subject to arbitrary requirements.
AND WHEREAS WE DID ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1900: by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain POWERS, FUNCTIONS, and AUTHORITIES were
declared to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We are
desirous of making effectual and permanent provision for the office of
Governor General and Commander in chief in and over Our said
Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on each
demise of the said office. Now know ye that We have thought fit to
*CONSTITUTE*, *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, *AND* *DO* *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, that there shall be a
Governor General and Commander in Chief (hereinafter called the Governor
General) in and over Our Commonwealth of Australia (hereinafter called
Our said Commonwealth), and that the person who shall fill the said
office of Governor General shall be FROM *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED*
by Commission under Our Sign Manual and Signet.
[<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Queen%20Victoria%27s%20Letters%20Patent%201900.pdf>]
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Grumble-HeteroSquare-Order.jpeg>
AS THEN THE EXPRESSION OF THE #390 - SOVEREIGN'S *RESERVE* (APODIDOMI
v's DIDOMI) RIGHT IN DEPLOYING THE #45 - HETERO SQUARE SPIROGYRA ORDER
ARRAY BEING CONSISTENT WITH THE USAGE WITHIN THE GENERAL #391 -
be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia
to Ourselves Our heirs and successors, full power and authority from
*TIME* *TO* *TIME* to revoke, alter, or amend these Our Letters Patent
as to Us or them shall seem meet.
Australia Constitution Act 1900,” it is amongst other things enacted,
that we may authorise the Governor General to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to exercise, during the
pleasure of the Governor General such powers, and functions of the said
Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies,
subject to any limitations expressed or directions given by Us: Now We
do hereby authorise and empower Our said Governor General subject to
such limitations and directions as aforesaid, to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, such of his powers and functions, as he
may deem it necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided
always, that the appointment of such a Deputy or Deputies shall not
affect the exercise by the Governor General himself of any power or
function.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>
[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 REPRESENTED BY A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL TRINOMIAL
NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND IN MY POSSESSION UPON ANZAC DAY
PANTOMIME '#492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL' PROTEST AND ARREST OF 25 APRIL 2006]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #40 - REVERSAL, AVOIDING
ACTIVITY; I-CHING: H36 - SUPPRESSION OF THE LIGHT, SINKING / DARKENING
LIGHT, BRILLIANCE INJURED, INTELLIGENCE HIDDEN; TETRA: 68 - DIMMING as
satisfied with itself. The use in experience to which reason limits the
pure understanding does not entirely fulfill reason’s own vocation.
Each individual experience is only a part of the whole sphere of the
domain of experience, but the absolute totality of all possible
experience is not itself an experience, and yet is still a necessary
problem for reason, for the mere representation of which reason needs
concepts entirely different from the pure concepts of the understanding,
whose use is only immanent, i.e., refers to experience insofar as such
experience can be given, whereas the concepts of reason extend to the
completeness, i.e., the collective unity of the whole of possible
experience, and in that way exceed any given experience and become
transcendent.
Hence, just as the understanding needed the categories for experience,
reason contains in itself the basis for ideas, by which I mean necessary
concepts whose object nevertheless cannot be given in any experience.
The latter are just as intrinsic to the nature of reason as are the
former to that of the understanding; and if the ideas carry with them an
illusion that can easily mislead, this illusion is inevitable, although
it can very well be prevented “from leading us astray.”
Since all illusion consists in taking the subjective basis for a
judgment to be objective, pure reason’s knowledge of itself in its
transcendent (overreaching) use will be the only prevention against the
errors into which reason falls if it misconstrues its vocation and, in
transcendent fashion, refers to the object in itself that which concerns
only its own subject and the guidance of that subject in every use that
is immanent.” [page 80]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #51 - NATURAL GUIDES AND
NURSING VIRTUOSITY; I-CHING: H47 - OPPRESSION (EXHAUSTION), CONFINING,
the usefulness of a system of categories is here revealed so clearly and
unmistakably that even if there were no further grounds of proof of that
system, this alone would sufficiently establish their indispensability
in the system of pure reason. There are no more than four such
transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories; in each
of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of the
series of conditions for a given conditioned.
In accordance with these cosmological ideas there are also only four
kinds of dialectical assertions of pure reason, which show themselves to
be dialectical because for each such assertion a contradictory one
stands in opposition in accordance with equally plausible principles of
pure reason, a conflict that cannot be avoided by any metaphysical art
of the most subtle distinctions, but that requires the philosopher to
return to the first sources of pure reason itself. This antinomy, by no
means arbitrarily contrived, but grounded in the nature of human reason
and so inevitable and never ending, contains the following four theses
together with their antitheses.
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}
<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>
THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).
ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY
THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY
THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.
ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS
THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent. ” [pages 90 to 91]
Nous: #25
Time: 12:50 hrs
Date: 2019.10.6
WASTING: T'ANG (#50),
AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
   Male: #108; Feme: #130
} // #130
Dao: What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious
Tetra: #10 - Defectiveness, Distortion
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Advitor {Infinitely good God} Alt: Rah'el {Friend of God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST ACCIDENTS, MAINTAINS HEALTH & HEALS
2. TRADE & BUSINESSMEN
3. BUSINESS
4. Asau
}
Solar Eclipse: 3 (UTC) / 4 February 1916 (AEST) [During World War I: 28
July 1914 to 11 November 1918]
#111 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#307 / #479} / HETEROS {#334 / #452} / TORAH {#334
/ #452}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:9,nous:25&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
'OVERWHELMINGLY UNLIKELY,' ANGELA MERKEL TELLS BORIS JOHNSON"
The prime minister spoke with Ms Merkel for 30 minutes this morning,
with Mr Johnson stressing that Brexit negotiations in Brussels "are
close to breaking down", Number 10 said.
The government last week unveiled its proposals for a renegotiated
Brexit deal, with the prime minister hoping this can be agreed before
the current 31 October deadline.
During the call, Mr Johnson was said to have told Ms Merkel the plans -
which would ditch the controversial Irish border backstop arrangement -
represented a "reasonable offer", but that it was not apparent to him
"there was any desire for negotiation from the EU".
Reacting to Number 10's account of the discussion, European Council
President Donald Tusk warned Mr Johnson that "what's at stake is not
winning some stupid blame game".
In a tweet directed at the prime minister, Mr Tusk said: "At stake is
the future of Europe and the UK as well as the security and interests of
our people. You don't want a deal, you don't want an extension, you
don't want to revoke, quo vadis? (Latin for "Where are you going?")"
YOUTUBE: "Male Irish Jig"
http://youtu.be/wIfnbVPP3SM
ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis of ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign dynamic
is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT so it is little wonder
then that the German Chancellor Angela MERKEL has become objectionable
in stating that a BREXIT deal is 'overwhelmingly unlikely'."
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>
Initial Post: 6 October 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-10-09 07:49:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
They see your property and they go whoosh which is a synonym for rustle
{to move swiftly and energetically / to steal (cattle, horses, etc)}

It's a MAXIM:

[the, {@1: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#11); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
(#51)},

only, {@2: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#85); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#81)},

community, {@3: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#153); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION:
CHENG (#106)},

minded, {@4: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#212); Ego: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG
(#137)},

American, {@5: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#240); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI
(#174)},

is, {@6: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#305); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#202)},

the, {@7: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#381); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
(#253)},

one, {@8: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#397); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN
(#287: *SEPTET* INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS)},

looting, {@9: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#476); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE:
CH'A (#298)},

after, {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#547); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
(#357)},

a, {@11: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#619); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#358)},

hurricane] {@12: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#646); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE
(#428: SEE KANT'S *PROLEGOMENA* IDEA)},

THESIS: The world has a beginning in time and is, as regards space, also
enclosed in boundaries

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @1 = #175 as precedent of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>

THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).

ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.

For, if one assumes that the world has no beginning in time: then up to
any given point in time an eternity has transpired and therefore in the
world an infinite series of successive states of things has gone by. But
the infinity of a series consists, however, in the very fact that it can
never be completed through successive synthesis. Therefore an infinitely
flowing world-series is impossible, and so a beginning to the world is a
necessary condition of its existence; which was the first thing to be
proven. As regards the second part, one again assumes the opposite: then
the world will be an infinite, given whole of simultaneously existing
things. Now the magnitude of a quantum that is not given within the
specific boundaries of any intuition ∗ cannot be thought in any other
manner except through the synthesis of parts, and the totality of such a
quantum only through the completed synthesis, or through repeated
addition of unity to itself. ∗∗ Accordingly, in order for the world,
which fills up all of space, to be thought as a whole, the successive
synthesis of the parts of an infinite world would have to be considered
as completed, i.e., in counting through all coexisting things an
infinite time would have to be considered as having transpired; which is
impossible. Accordingly, an infinite aggregate of actual things cannot
be regarded as a whole that is given, and hence not as a who l e that is
simultaneously given. Consequently the world is, with respect to
extension in space, not infinite , but is enclosed in its boundaries;
which was the second thing to be proven. . . . [page 192 to 193]


On 9/10/19 5:31 pm, Lions Growl of Butchers Foul wrote:> On Wednesday,
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
And so ends the MAXIM that [the] only community minded American is
the one
Post by dolf
looting after a hurricane
A "maxim" is something everydody both*understands*, and, understands
is*true*.
Your gibberish meets neither requirement, therefore is not a "maxim".
Maybe you could create your own words to describe your gibberish.,
instead of stealing real words that already have meanings?
For 50% of what you write, you could start with the first 3 letters
of the word you are contemplating misappropriating, and then completing
the word with additional letters that give a more accurate picture of
what your thinking?
The remaining 50% could similarly use the last 3 letters with an
appropriate prefix replacing the rest?

That if the the ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis to ROMAN
EMPIRE GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign
dynamic is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT {ie. #1080 -
HETEROS NUMBER} then all it requires is a substantiation {ie.

#38 + #73 + #111 + #117 = 3 x #111 + #6 = #339 as [#300, #30, #9] =
shᵉlêṭ (H7981): {UMBRA: #27 as #339 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *HAVE* *POWER*,
*RULE*, *DOMINEER*, *RULE* *OVER*; 1a) (P'al) *HAVE* *POWER* *UPON* *OR*
*OVER*, *RULE*, *FALL* *UPON*, *ASSAULT*, *BE* *RULER*; 1b) (Aphel)
*MAKE* *RULER*;

*TRIFECTA* of Harvest / Micro Full Moon on Friday 13 September 2019 with
peak @ 0432 hours UTC on Saturday 14 September 2019

As another term for EXĀCTUS (LATIN: feminine exācta, neuter exāctum,
comparative exāctior)

1) driven out, expelled, having been driven out
2) demanded, required, enforced, exacted, having been demanded
3) weighed, having been weighed
4) determined, found out, ascertained, having been determined
a) (by extension) precise, exact, accurate
5) endured, undergone, having been endured
6) (of time) spent, passed, having been spent
7) concluded, finished, completed, having been finished

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#315 / #392} / HETEROS {#265 / #367} / TORAH {#199
/ #415}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:5,col:5,nous:41&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#424 / #238} / HETEROS {#396 / #305} / TORAH {#342
/ #278}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:8,nous:14&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

} of a logical capacity by the necessity of TRINOMIAL / BINOMIAL
INTEROPERABILITY {@175, #328, #339, #369, #434, (#424?)} with the
provision of a #491 - RULE {PATER FAMILIAS PRINCIPLE / #82 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY} + #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {LETTERS PATENT / #205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE} SAPIENT ECONOMY {#1364 / 4 = #341}
#339 - INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT BY #81 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE:

ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @228 + @175 = #553 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #700]
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;

#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;

#339 as [#30, #1, #8, #200, #50, #10, #600] = ʼachărôwn (H314): {UMBRA:
#0 as #265 % #41 = #19} 1) behind, following, subsequent, *WESTERN*; 1a)
behind, hindermost, western (of location); 1b) later, subsequent,
latter, *LAST* (*OF* *TIME*);

#341 as [#1, #60, #80, #200] = çâphar (H5608): {UMBRA: #25 as #340 % #41
= #12} 1) to count, recount, relate; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to count (things);
1a2) to *NUMBER*, take account of, reckon; 1b) (Niphal) to be counted,
be numbered; 1c) (Piel) to recount, rehearse, declare; 1c1) to recount
(something), rehearse; 1c2) to talk; 1c3) to count exactly or
accurately; 1d) (Pual) to be recounted, be rehearsed, be related; 2)
enumerator, muster-officer, secretary, scribe; 2a) enumerator,
muster-officer, *SECRETARY*; 2b) learned man, scribe;

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @1 = #175 as precedent of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>

THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).

ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @2 = #328 as #287 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY

THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @3 = #339 - BINOMIAL STASIS / TRINOMIAL
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY

THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.

ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @4 = #369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR FOR
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS

THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>

Initial Post: 9 October 2019
Report them to the FBI?
And so ends the MAXIM that only community minded American is the one
looting after a hurricane
Post by dolf
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:27:17 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the
BUY-BACK
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party
erasing
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head.  You
need
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for
thinking the
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
wrong way.
You're guilty of hate speech, Beamie. I oughtta report you to the FBI.
— BORIS RUMOURED TO BE PROPOSING A SAPIENT ECONOMY #339 -
INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT AS #82 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE (#339 - PROROGUING CRYSTALLISATION /
CAUTERISATION OF 13 TO 17 SEPTEMBER 2019) TO ENSURE THE EUROPEAN UNION
DOESN’T DANCE THE IRISH JIG UPON OUR ARMISTICE WAR GRAVES
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 8 October 2019
2019: "COMMONS SPEAKER’S POWERS COULD BE CURBED IF TORIES WIN ELECTION
The government could institute a review of the powers of the speaker of
the Commons if Conservatives win a majority at the next election, a
senior minister has suggested.
The current speaker, John Bercow, has infuriated the government with a
series of rulings, which have thrown obstacles in the way of Brexit.
Most significantly, he has allowed emergency motions under a Commons
rule known as Standing Order 24 (SO24) to be used to let MPs seize
control of the business of the house to push through legislation
limiting the PM’s room for manoeuvre.
Mr Bercow has allowed SO24 to be used to force binding votes, in a move
away from the convention that debate on emergency motions ends with a
“neutral” division stating simply that the house has considered the issue.
An SO24 motion was used to push through legislation forcing Theresa May
to seek an extension to Brexit talks in the spring, and the tactic was
employed again to facilitate the so-called Benn Act, which requires
Boris Johnson to ask for another delay if he fails to secure a deal with
parliamentary support within the next two weeks.
Mr Bercow – who many Brexiteers believe is a committed opponent of EU
withdrawal – has also permitted the use of the formerly little-known
procedure of a “*HUMBLE* *ADDRESS*” to the Queen to enable opposition
parties to force the release of secret government documents.
And he has massively increased the number of urgent questions taken in
the Commons, forcing ministers to the despatch box to face lengthy
grillings on Brexit policy.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the minister told The Independent it
was time to consider imposing constraints on the speaker’s discretion to
interpret the rules of parliament.
“Parliament has a rulebook and it has conventions about its procedures
that have developed over a long period for a very good reason,” said the
minister.
“You can’t have someone in that position *GETTING* *UP* *IN* *THE*
*MORNING* *AND* *DECIDING* *THAT* *HE* *IS* *GOING* *TO* *DO* *THINGS*
*DIFFERENTLY* *AND* *BEND* *THE* *RULES* as he wishes.""
[<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/speaker-powers-commons-review-election-conservative-john-bercow-a9143191.html>]
Nous: #38
Time: 05:10 hrs
Date: 2019.6.8
{%15}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#58),
   Male: #146; Feme: #58
} // #58
Dao: Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra: #11 - Divergence
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}
Solar Eclipse: 8 (UTC) / 9 June 1918 (AEST) [During World War I: 28 July
1914 to 11 November 1918]
#175 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#409 / #413} / HETEROS {#395 / #406} / TORAH {#422
/ #379}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:2,nous:38&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
hrs, Super: #409 / #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release, Ego: #413 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{524}>
chârâsh (H2796): {UMBRA: #13 as #508 % #41 = #16} 1) *CRAFTSMAN*,
*ARTISAN*, *ENGRAVER*, *GRAVER*, *ARTIFICER*; 1a) graver, artificer; 1b)
*SKILFUL* *TO* *DESTROY* (*WARRIORS*) (fig.);
#524 as [#10, #3, #200, #300, #6, #5] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #2 as
#503 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE*
*AWAY*, *DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST*
*UP*; 1a) (Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away,
be tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust
out;
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Janet.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/OATH%2020170608%201510%20-%202.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%201.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%204.jpg>
1510 HOURS ON 8 JUNE 2017 {#413 as [#1, #30, #10, #300, #2, #70] =
ʼĔlîyshebaʻ (H472): {UMBRA: #4 as #413 % #41 = #3} 0) Elisheba = 'my God
has sworn' or 'God is an oath'; 1) Aaron's wife; *ELIZABETH*}  BY A
ON 10 JUNE 2017 (SHOWN BOTTOM LEFT / RIGHT) BEING MADE UPON THE BOER WAR
MEMORIAL ESTABLISHED 29 OCTOBER 1909 / RE-SITED 25 APRIL 1972 AS THE
ONLY SUBJECTIVE MEMORIAL OCCASION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN ABNORMAL BOER
WAR MEMORIAL #390 - WREATH PLACEMENT last upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and #312
- WITHERED STATE REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018]
NORTH KOREAN INTEROPERABILITY?
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;
#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;
{UMBRA: #25 as #553 % #41 = #20} 0) Elisabeth = 'oath of God'; 1) the
wife of Zacharias and mother of John the Baptist, of the priestly
family, and a relative of Mary, [Luke 1:36]
#533 as [#30, #3, #200, #300] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #5 as #503 % #41
= #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE* *AWAY*,
*DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST* *UP*; 1a)
(Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away, be
tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust out;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{553}>
HELSINKI ON 5 OCTOBER 2019: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said
Saturday teams from North Korea [DPRK] and the United States have
arrived in the Swedish capital Stockholm to resume discussions on
Pyongyang’s nuclear program.
[<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/north-korea-us-resume-nuclear-diplomacy-with-sweden-talks/2019/10/05/9b300c72-e765-11e9-b0a6-3d03721b85ef_story.html>]
(#83)},
20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE
PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
What is the likelihood of favourable progress upon an interoperability
the lifting of acute sanctions which might then have a ripple effect on
China / Hong Kong tensions that by comparison seems to be spiralling
into violence and lawlessness?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than [7.5] billion people in the world today, and though
we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>
[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
@A78: "[IDEA @B102 / @A76] General logic (as has already been said
several times) abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits
representations to be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may
be, so that, proceeding analytically, it can first transform these
representations into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a
manifold of sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental
pure concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without
any content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a
manifold of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless be- long to
the conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone
representations of objects can be received, and which must therefore
ever affect the concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought
demands that the manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined
in a specific manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call
this act synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., the *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [Pages 164 to 166]
(#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
{%40}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#160),
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #244; Feme: #175
} // #175
UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
- I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] / #328 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8,
#20, #5, #50] / #339 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #5, #50, #1,
#10] / #369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
{UMBRA: #42 as #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one
anything; 1g1) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *CONSTITUTE* *OR* *APPOINT* *ONE*
*ANYTHING*, *TO* *APPOINT* *OR* *ORDAIN* *ONE* *THAT*; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE*
ie.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors
of a thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do
well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to
do to one; 2c) *WITH* *DESIGNATION* *OF* *TIME*: to pass, spend; 2d) to
celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME*
*TO* *INSTITUTE*, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a
promise;
"THEN JOSEPH {INCREASE; ADDITION} BEING RAISED FROM SLEEP DID-G4160 AS
THE #246 - ANGEL OF THE LORD HAD BIDDEN HIM, AND TOOK UNTO HIM HIS
WIFE:" [Matthew 1:24]
Interoperability imply open standards AB INITIO which is a Latin term
meaning "from the beginning" and is derived from the Latin ab ("from") +
initio, ablative singular of initium ("beginning").
THUS THIS PROVISIONAL (I am reliant upon the expertise of others)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{175}&idea:{328}&idea:{339}&idea:{369}&idea:{434}>
With the #SIXTH being subject to arbitrary requirements.
AND WHEREAS WE DID ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1900: by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain POWERS, FUNCTIONS, and AUTHORITIES were
declared to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We are
desirous of making effectual and permanent provision for the office of
Governor General and Commander in chief in and over Our said
Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on each
demise of the said office. Now know ye that We have thought fit to
*CONSTITUTE*, *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, *AND* *DO* *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, that there shall be a
Governor General and Commander in Chief (hereinafter called the Governor
General) in and over Our Commonwealth of Australia (hereinafter called
Our said Commonwealth), and that the person who shall fill the said
office of Governor General shall be FROM *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED*
by Commission under Our Sign Manual and Signet.
[<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Queen%20Victoria%27s%20Letters%20Patent%201900.pdf>]
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Grumble-HeteroSquare-Order.jpeg>
AS THEN THE EXPRESSION OF THE #390 - SOVEREIGN'S *RESERVE* (APODIDOMI
v's DIDOMI) RIGHT IN DEPLOYING THE #45 - HETERO SQUARE SPIROGYRA ORDER
ARRAY BEING CONSISTENT WITH THE USAGE WITHIN THE GENERAL #391 -
be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia
to Ourselves Our heirs and successors, full power and authority from
*TIME* *TO* *TIME* to revoke, alter, or amend these Our Letters Patent
as to Us or them shall seem meet.
Australia Constitution Act 1900,” it is amongst other things enacted,
that we may authorise the Governor General to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to exercise, during the
pleasure of the Governor General such powers, and functions of the said
Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies,
subject to any limitations expressed or directions given by Us: Now We
do hereby authorise and empower Our said Governor General subject to
such limitations and directions as aforesaid, to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, such of his powers and functions, as he
may deem it necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided
always, that the appointment of such a Deputy or Deputies shall not
affect the exercise by the Governor General himself of any power or
function.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>
[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 REPRESENTED BY A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL TRINOMIAL
NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND IN MY POSSESSION UPON ANZAC DAY
PANTOMIME '#492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL' PROTEST AND ARREST OF 25 APRIL 2006]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #40 - REVERSAL, AVOIDING
ACTIVITY; I-CHING: H36 - SUPPRESSION OF THE LIGHT, SINKING / DARKENING
LIGHT, BRILLIANCE INJURED, INTELLIGENCE HIDDEN; TETRA: 68 - DIMMING as
satisfied with itself. The use in experience to which reason limits the
pure understanding does not entirely fulfill reason’s own vocation.
Each individual experience is only a part of the whole sphere of the
domain of experience, but the absolute totality of all possible
experience is not itself an experience, and yet is still a necessary
problem for reason, for the mere representation of which reason needs
concepts entirely different from the pure concepts of the understanding,
whose use is only immanent, i.e., refers to experience insofar as such
experience can be given, whereas the concepts of reason extend to the
completeness, i.e., the collective unity of the whole of possible
experience, and in that way exceed any given experience and become
transcendent.
Hence, just as the understanding needed the categories for experience,
reason contains in itself the basis for ideas, by which I mean necessary
concepts whose object nevertheless cannot be given in any experience.
The latter are just as intrinsic to the nature of reason as are the
former to that of the understanding; and if the ideas carry with them an
illusion that can easily mislead, this illusion is inevitable, although
it can very well be prevented “from leading us astray.”
Since all illusion consists in taking the subjective basis for a
judgment to be objective, pure reason’s knowledge of itself in its
transcendent (overreaching) use will be the only prevention against the
errors into which reason falls if it misconstrues its vocation and, in
transcendent fashion, refers to the object in itself that which concerns
only its own subject and the guidance of that subject in every use that
is immanent.” [page 80]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #51 - NATURAL GUIDES AND
NURSING VIRTUOSITY; I-CHING: H47 - OPPRESSION (EXHAUSTION), CONFINING,
the usefulness of a system of categories is here revealed so clearly and
unmistakably that even if there were no further grounds of proof of that
system, this alone would sufficiently establish their indispensability
in the system of pure reason. There are no more than four such
transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories; in each
of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of the
series of conditions for a given conditioned.
In accordance with these cosmological ideas there are also only four
kinds of dialectical assertions of pure reason, which show themselves to
be dialectical because for each such assertion a contradictory one
stands in opposition in accordance with equally plausible principles of
pure reason, a conflict that cannot be avoided by any metaphysical art
of the most subtle distinctions, but that requires the philosopher to
return to the first sources of pure reason itself. This antinomy, by no
means arbitrarily contrived, but grounded in the nature of human reason
and so inevitable and never ending, contains the following four theses
together with their antitheses.
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}
<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>
THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).
ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY
THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY
THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.
ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS
THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent. ” [pages 90 to 91]
Nous: #25
Time: 12:50 hrs
Date: 2019.10.6
WASTING: T'ANG (#50),
AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
   Male: #108; Feme: #130
} // #130
Dao: What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious
Tetra: #10 - Defectiveness, Distortion
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Advitor {Infinitely good God} Alt: Rah'el {Friend of God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST ACCIDENTS, MAINTAINS HEALTH & HEALS
2. TRADE & BUSINESSMEN
3. BUSINESS
4. Asau
}
Solar Eclipse: 3 (UTC) / 4 February 1916 (AEST) [During World War I: 28
July 1914 to 11 November 1918]
#111 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#307 / #479} / HETEROS {#334 / #452} / TORAH {#334
/ #452}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:9,nous:25&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
'OVERWHELMINGLY UNLIKELY,' ANGELA MERKEL TELLS BORIS JOHNSON"
The prime minister spoke with Ms Merkel for 30 minutes this morning,
with Mr Johnson stressing that Brexit negotiations in Brussels "are
close to breaking down", Number 10 said.
The government last week unveiled its proposals for a renegotiated
Brexit deal, with the prime minister hoping this can be agreed before
the current 31 October deadline.
During the call, Mr Johnson was said to have told Ms Merkel the plans -
which would ditch the controversial Irish border backstop arrangement -
represented a "reasonable offer", but that it was not apparent to him
"there was any desire for negotiation from the EU".
Reacting to Number 10's account of the discussion, European Council
President Donald Tusk warned Mr Johnson that "what's at stake is not
winning some stupid blame game".
In a tweet directed at the prime minister, Mr Tusk said: "At stake is
the future of Europe and the UK as well as the security and interests of
our people. You don't want a deal, you don't want an extension, you
don't want to revoke, quo vadis? (Latin for "Where are you going?")"
YOUTUBE: "Male Irish Jig"
http://youtu.be/wIfnbVPP3SM
ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis of ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign dynamic
is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT so it is little wonder
then that the German Chancellor Angela MERKEL has become objectionable
in stating that a BREXIT deal is 'overwhelmingly unlikely'."
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>
Initial Post: 6 October 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2019-10-09 00:59:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Report them to the FBI?

And so ends the MAXIM that the only community minded American is the one
looting after a hurricane
Post by Ted
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:27:17 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the
BUY-BACK
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party
erasing
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head.  You
need
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for
thinking the
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
wrong way.
You're guilty of hate speech, Beamie. I oughtta report you to the FBI.
— THE BREXIT / EUROPEAN UNION BLAME GAME

That if the the ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis to ROMAN
EMPIRE GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign
dynamic is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT {ie. #1080 -
HETEROS NUMBER} then all it requires is a substantiation {ie.

#38 + #73 + #111 + #117 = 3 x #111 + #6 = #339 as [#300, #30, #9] =
shᵉlêṭ (H7981): {UMBRA: #27 as #339 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *HAVE* *POWER*,
*RULE*, *DOMINEER*, *RULE* *OVER*; 1a) (P'al) *HAVE* *POWER* *UPON* *OR*
*OVER*, *RULE*, *FALL* *UPON*, *ASSAULT*, *BE* *RULER*; 1b) (Aphel)
*MAKE* *RULER*;

*TRIFECTA* of Harvest / Micro Full Moon on Friday 13 September 2019 with
peak @ 0432 hours UTC on Saturday 14 September 2019

As another term for EXĀCTUS (LATIN: feminine exācta, neuter exāctum,
comparative exāctior)

1) driven out, expelled, having been driven out
2) demanded, required, enforced, exacted, having been demanded
3) weighed, having been weighed
4) determined, found out, ascertained, having been determined
a) (by extension) precise, exact, accurate
5) endured, undergone, having been endured
6) (of time) spent, passed, having been spent
7) concluded, finished, completed, having been finished

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#315 / #392} / HETEROS {#265 / #367} / TORAH {#199
/ #415}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:5,col:5,nous:41&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#424 / #238} / HETEROS {#396 / #305} / TORAH {#342
/ #278}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:8,nous:14&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

} of a logical capacity by the necessity of TRINOMIAL / BINOMIAL
INTEROPERABILITY {@175, #328, #339, #369, #434, (#424?)} with the
provision of a #491 - RULE {PATER FAMILIAS PRINCIPLE / #82 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY} + #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {LETTERS PATENT / #205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE} SAPIENT ECONOMY {#1364 / 4 = #341}
#339 - INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT BY #81 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE:

ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @228 + @175 = #553 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #700]
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;

#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;

#339 as [#30, #1, #8, #200, #50, #10, #600] = ʼachărôwn (H314): {UMBRA:
#0 as #265 % #41 = #19} 1) behind, following, subsequent, *WESTERN*; 1a)
behind, hindermost, western (of location); 1b) later, subsequent,
latter, *LAST* (*OF* *TIME*);

#341 as [#1, #60, #80, #200] = çâphar (H5608): {UMBRA: #25 as #340 % #41
= #12} 1) to count, recount, relate; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to count (things);
1a2) to *NUMBER*, take account of, reckon; 1b) (Niphal) to be counted,
be numbered; 1c) (Piel) to recount, rehearse, declare; 1c1) to recount
(something), rehearse; 1c2) to talk; 1c3) to count exactly or
accurately; 1d) (Pual) to be recounted, be rehearsed, be related; 2)
enumerator, muster-officer, secretary, scribe; 2a) enumerator,
muster-officer, *SECRETARY*; 2b) learned man, scribe;

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @1 = #175 as precedent of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>

THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).

ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @2 = #328 as #287 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY

THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @3 = #339 - BINOMIAL STASIS / TRINOMIAL
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY

THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.

ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @4 = #369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR FOR
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS

THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>

Initial Post: 9 October 2019

— BORIS RUMOURED TO BE PROPOSING A SAPIENT ECONOMY #339 -
INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT AS #82 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE (#339 - PROROGUING CRYSTALLISATION /
CAUTERISATION OF 13 TO 17 SEPTEMBER 2019) TO ENSURE THE EUROPEAN UNION
DOESN’T DANCE THE IRISH JIG UPON OUR ARMISTICE WAR GRAVES

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 8 October 2019

POLITICAL EDITOR ANDREW WOODCOCK (INDEPENDENT) @ 2335 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER
2019: "COMMONS SPEAKER’S POWERS COULD BE CURBED IF TORIES WIN ELECTION
MAJORITY, MINISTER SUGGESTS:

The government could institute a review of the powers of the speaker of
the Commons if Conservatives win a majority at the next election, a
senior minister has suggested.

The current speaker, John Bercow, has infuriated the government with a
series of rulings, which have thrown obstacles in the way of Brexit.

Most significantly, he has allowed emergency motions under a Commons
rule known as Standing Order 24 (SO24) to be used to let MPs seize
control of the business of the house to push through legislation
limiting the PM’s room for manoeuvre.

Mr Bercow has allowed SO24 to be used to force binding votes, in a move
away from the convention that debate on emergency motions ends with a
“neutral” division stating simply that the house has considered the issue.

An SO24 motion was used to push through legislation forcing Theresa May
to seek an extension to Brexit talks in the spring, and the tactic was
employed again to facilitate the so-called Benn Act, which requires
Boris Johnson to ask for another delay if he fails to secure a deal with
parliamentary support within the next two weeks.

Mr Bercow – who many Brexiteers believe is a committed opponent of EU
withdrawal – has also permitted the use of the formerly little-known
procedure of a “*HUMBLE* *ADDRESS*” to the Queen to enable opposition
parties to force the release of secret government documents.

And he has massively increased the number of urgent questions taken in
the Commons, forcing ministers to the despatch box to face lengthy
grillings on Brexit policy.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the minister told The Independent it
was time to consider imposing constraints on the speaker’s discretion to
interpret the rules of parliament.

“Parliament has a rulebook and it has conventions about its procedures
that have developed over a long period for a very good reason,” said the
minister.

“You can’t have someone in that position *GETTING* *UP* *IN* *THE*
*MORNING* *AND* *DECIDING* *THAT* *HE* *IS* *GOING* *TO* *DO* *THINGS*
*DIFFERENTLY* *AND* *BEND* *THE* *RULES* as he wishes.""
[<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/speaker-powers-commons-review-election-conservative-john-bercow-a9143191.html>]

Nous: #38
Time: 05:10 hrs
Date: 2019.6.8
Torah: [#40, #8, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40),
@2: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#88); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#48),
@3: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER
{%15}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#58),
Male: #146; Feme: #58
} // #58

Dao: Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra: #11 - Divergence
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing

Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {

1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}


Solar Eclipse: 8 (UTC) / 9 June 1918 (AEST) [During World War I: 28 July
1914 to 11 November 1918]

#175 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#409 / #413} / HETEROS {#395 / #406} / TORAH {#422
/ #379}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:2,nous:38&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 2, nous: 38 [Date: 2019.6.8, Time: 05:10
hrs, Super: #409 / #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release, Ego: #413 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{524}>

ONTIC CHECKSUM: @157 + @181 + @186 = #524 as [#6, #8, #200, #300, #10] =
chârâsh (H2796): {UMBRA: #13 as #508 % #41 = #16} 1) *CRAFTSMAN*,
*ARTISAN*, *ENGRAVER*, *GRAVER*, *ARTIFICER*; 1a) graver, artificer; 1b)
*SKILFUL* *TO* *DESTROY* (*WARRIORS*) (fig.);

#524 as [#10, #3, #200, #300, #6, #5] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #2 as
#503 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE*
*AWAY*, *DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST*
*UP*; 1a) (Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away,
be tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust out;

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Janet.jpg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/OATH%2020170608%201510%20-%202.jpg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%201.jpg>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%204.jpg>

[IMAGES: @ (TOP LEFT) 1058 HOURS ON 17 MARCH 2017: FUNERAL RIGHTS AND
CELEBRATING THE DEATH OF A STATE AS PLAQUE INSTALLATION @ (TOP RIGHT)
1510 HOURS ON 8 JUNE 2017 {#413 as [#1, #30, #10, #300, #2, #70] =
ʼĔlîyshebaʻ (H472): {UMBRA: #4 as #413 % #41 = #3} 0) Elisheba = 'my God
has sworn' or 'God is an oath'; 1) Aaron's wife; *ELIZABETH*} BY A
CONTRIVED SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE IMPOSITION OBSERVED @ 1153 HOURS
ON 10 JUNE 2017 (SHOWN BOTTOM LEFT / RIGHT) BEING MADE UPON THE BOER WAR
MEMORIAL ESTABLISHED 29 OCTOBER 1909 / RE-SITED 25 APRIL 1972 AS THE
ONLY SUBJECTIVE MEMORIAL OCCASION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN ABNORMAL BOER
WAR MEMORIAL #390 - WREATH PLACEMENT last upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and #312
- WITHERED STATE REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018]

DOLF @ 2358 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2019: "CAN WE EXPECT SOME PROGRESS ON
NORTH KOREAN INTEROPERABILITY?

ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @228 + @175 = #553 as [#2, #200, #1, #300, #700]
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;

#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;

#553 as [#5, #30, #10, #200, #1, #2, #5, #300] = Elisábet (G1665):
{UMBRA: #25 as #553 % #41 = #20} 0) Elisabeth = 'oath of God'; 1) the
wife of Zacharias and mother of John the Baptist, of the priestly
family, and a relative of Mary, [Luke 1:36]

#533 as [#30, #3, #200, #300] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #5 as #503 % #41
= #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE* *AWAY*,
*DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST* *UP*; 1a)
(Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away, be
tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust out;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{553}>

HELSINKI ON 5 OCTOBER 2019: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said
Saturday teams from North Korea [DPRK] and the United States have
arrived in the Swedish capital Stockholm to resume discussions on
Pyongyang’s nuclear program.
[<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/north-korea-us-resume-nuclear-diplomacy-with-sweden-talks/2019/10/05/9b300c72-e765-11e9-b0a6-3d03721b85ef_story.html>]

[D, {@1: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4)},
P, {@2: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#78); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#74)},
R, {@3: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#80); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU
(#83)},
K] {@4: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego:
20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE
PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

What is the likelihood of favourable progress upon an interoperability
{@175, #328, #339, #369, #434, (#424?)} agreement with North Korea and
the lifting of acute sanctions which might then have a ripple effect on
China / Hong Kong tensions that by comparison seems to be spiralling
into violence and lawlessness?

What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.

Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.

There are more than [7.5] billion people in the world today, and though
we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.

But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER:

+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>

[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]

When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).

Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]

AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
    C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
    O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
    R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
    A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
    L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES (THIRD SECTION) AS IDEAS @B102 / @B103 /
@A78: "[IDEA @B102 / @A76] General logic (as has already been said
several times) abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits
representations to be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may
be, so that, proceeding analytically, it can first transform these
representations into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a
manifold of sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental
aesthetic offers to it in order to provide material [IDEA @A77] for the
pure concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without
any content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a
manifold of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless be- long to
the conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone
representations of objects can be received, and which must therefore
ever affect the concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought
demands that the manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined
in a specific manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call
this act synthesis.

By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
[IDEA @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another,
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
specific content; it is therefore the first [IDEA @A78] thing to which
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.

Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.

The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
[IDEA @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., the *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT

This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']

Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
the sake [IDEA @A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [Pages 164 to 166]

G4160@{
   @1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80),
   @2: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#149); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE
(#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   @3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES
{%40}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#160),
   @4: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#231); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#165),
   @5: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#244); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #244; Feme: #175
} // #175

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#25); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#84 - I AM NOT
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#48); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#61); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#175
- I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] / #328 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8,
#20, #5, #50] / #339 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #5, #50, #1,
#10] / #369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
#434 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #5, #10, #1, #50] = poiéō (G4160):
{UMBRA: #42 as #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one
anything; 1g1) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *CONSTITUTE* *OR* *APPOINT* *ONE*
*ANYTHING*, *TO* *APPOINT* *OR* *ORDAIN* *ONE* *THAT*; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE*
ie.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors
of a thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do
well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to
do to one; 2c) *WITH* *DESIGNATION* *OF* *TIME*: to pass, spend; 2d) to
celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME*
*TO* *INSTITUTE*, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a
promise;

"THEN JOSEPH {INCREASE; ADDITION} BEING RAISED FROM SLEEP DID-G4160 AS
THE #246 - ANGEL OF THE LORD HAD BIDDEN HIM, AND TOOK UNTO HIM HIS
WIFE:" [Matthew 1:24]

Interoperability imply open standards AB INITIO which is a Latin term
meaning "from the beginning" and is derived from the Latin ab ("from") +
initio, ablative singular of initium ("beginning").

THUS THIS PROVISIONAL (I am reliant upon the expertise of others)
PROTOTYPE CAN BE THE BASIS FOR AN INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT:

{@175, #328, #339, #369, #434, (#424?)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{175}&idea:{328}&idea:{339}&idea:{369}&idea:{434}>

With the #SIXTH being subject to arbitrary requirements.

AND WHEREAS WE DID ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1900: by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain POWERS, FUNCTIONS, and AUTHORITIES were
declared to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We are
desirous of making effectual and permanent provision for the office of
Governor General and Commander in chief in and over Our said
Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on each
demise of the said office. Now know ye that We have thought fit to
*CONSTITUTE*, *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, *AND* *DO* *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, that there shall be a
Governor General and Commander in Chief (hereinafter called the Governor
General) in and over Our Commonwealth of Australia (hereinafter called
Our said Commonwealth), and that the person who shall fill the said
office of Governor General shall be FROM *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED*
by Commission under Our Sign Manual and Signet.
[<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Queen%20Victoria%27s%20Letters%20Patent%201900.pdf>]


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Grumble-HeteroSquare-Order.jpeg>

AS THEN THE EXPRESSION OF THE #390 - SOVEREIGN'S *RESERVE* (APODIDOMI
v's DIDOMI) RIGHT IN DEPLOYING THE #45 - HETERO SQUARE SPIROGYRA ORDER
ARRAY BEING CONSISTENT WITH THE USAGE WITHIN THE GENERAL #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PROTOTYPE:

#1 + #2 + #3 = @6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: the
people of @1 - New South Wales, @2 - Victoria, @3 - South Australia, @4
- Queensland, and @5 - Tasmania and also @6 - Western Australia, should
be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia

#8 + #9 + #4 = @21 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE {LIABILITY}: We do hereby reserve
to Ourselves Our heirs and successors, full power and authority from
*TIME* *TO* *TIME* to revoke, alter, or amend these Our Letters Patent
as to Us or them shall seem meet.

#7 + #6 + #5 = @18 - FORM OF NATURE: And whereas by “The Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act 1900,” it is amongst other things enacted,
that we may authorise the Governor General to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to exercise, during the
pleasure of the Governor General such powers, and functions of the said
Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies,
subject to any limitations expressed or directions given by Us: Now We
do hereby authorise and empower Our said Governor General subject to
such limitations and directions as aforesaid, to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, such of his powers and functions, as he
may deem it necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided
always, that the appointment of such a Deputy or Deputies shall not
affect the exercise by the Governor General himself of any power or
function.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>

[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 REPRESENTED BY A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL TRINOMIAL
NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND IN MY POSSESSION UPON ANZAC DAY
PANTOMIME '#492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL' PROTEST AND ARREST OF 25 APRIL 2006]

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #40 - REVERSAL, AVOIDING
ACTIVITY; I-CHING: H36 - SUPPRESSION OF THE LIGHT, SINKING / DARKENING
LIGHT, BRILLIANCE INJURED, INTELLIGENCE HIDDEN; TETRA: 68 - DIMMING as
IDEA: @328: “Without a solution to this question reason will never be
satisfied with itself. The use in experience to which reason limits the
pure understanding does not entirely fulfill reason’s own vocation.

Each individual experience is only a part of the whole sphere of the
domain of experience, but the absolute totality of all possible
experience is not itself an experience, and yet is still a necessary
problem for reason, for the mere representation of which reason needs
concepts entirely different from the pure concepts of the understanding,
whose use is only immanent, i.e., refers to experience insofar as such
experience can be given, whereas the concepts of reason extend to the
completeness, i.e., the collective unity of the whole of possible
experience, and in that way exceed any given experience and become
transcendent.

Hence, just as the understanding needed the categories for experience,
reason contains in itself the basis for ideas, by which I mean necessary
concepts whose object nevertheless cannot be given in any experience.

The latter are just as intrinsic to the nature of reason as are the
former to that of the understanding; and if the ideas carry with them an
illusion that can easily mislead, this illusion is inevitable, although
it can very well be prevented “from leading us astray.”

Since all illusion consists in taking the subjective basis for a
judgment to be objective, pure reason’s knowledge of itself in its
transcendent (overreaching) use will be the only prevention against the
errors into which reason falls if it misconstrues its vocation and, in
transcendent fashion, refers to the object in itself that which concerns
only its own subject and the guidance of that subject in every use that
is immanent.” [page 80]

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #51 - NATURAL GUIDES AND
NURSING VIRTUOSITY; I-CHING: H47 - OPPRESSION (EXHAUSTION), CONFINING,
ENTANGLED; TETRA: 69 - EXHAUSTION as IDEA: @339: “In the first place,
the usefulness of a system of categories is here revealed so clearly and
unmistakably that even if there were no further grounds of proof of that
system, this alone would sufficiently establish their indispensability
in the system of pure reason. There are no more than four such
transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories; in each
of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of the
series of conditions for a given conditioned.

In accordance with these cosmological ideas there are also only four
kinds of dialectical assertions of pure reason, which show themselves to
be dialectical because for each such assertion a contradictory one
stands in opposition in accordance with equally plausible principles of
pure reason, a conflict that cannot be avoided by any metaphysical art
of the most subtle distinctions, but that requires the philosopher to
return to the first sources of pure reason itself. This antinomy, by no
means arbitrarily contrived, but grounded in the nature of human reason
and so inevitable and never ending, contains the following four theses
together with their antitheses.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @1 = #175 as precedent of QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>

THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).

ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @2 = #328 as #287 - SEPTET INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY

THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @3 = #339 - BINOMIAL STASIS / TRINOMIAL
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY

THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.

ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.

APRIORITY PROPOSITION @4 = #369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR FOR
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS

THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.

ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent. ” [pages 90 to 91]

Nous: #25
Time: 12:50 hrs
Date: 2019.10.6
Torah: [#50, #40, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#50); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#50),
@2: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#59); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#90),
@3: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#108); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#130 - I
AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #108; Feme: #130
} // #130

Dao: What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious
Tetra: #10 - Defectiveness, Distortion
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing

Latin: Advitor {Infinitely good God} Alt: Rah'el {Friend of God} {

1. PROTECTS AGAINST ACCIDENTS, MAINTAINS HEALTH & HEALS
2. TRADE & BUSINESSMEN
3. BUSINESS
4. Asau
}


Solar Eclipse: 3 (UTC) / 4 February 1916 (AEST) [During World War I: 28
July 1914 to 11 November 1918]

#111 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#307 / #479} / HETEROS {#334 / #452} / TORAH {#334
/ #452}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:9,nous:25&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

GREG HEFFER (SKY NEWS) @ 2229 HOURS ON 8 OCTOBER 2019: "BREXIT DEAL
'OVERWHELMINGLY UNLIKELY,' ANGELA MERKEL TELLS BORIS JOHNSON"

The prime minister spoke with Ms Merkel for 30 minutes this morning,
with Mr Johnson stressing that Brexit negotiations in Brussels "are
close to breaking down", Number 10 said.

The government last week unveiled its proposals for a renegotiated
Brexit deal, with the prime minister hoping this can be agreed before
the current 31 October deadline.

During the call, Mr Johnson was said to have told Ms Merkel the plans -
which would ditch the controversial Irish border backstop arrangement -
represented a "reasonable offer", but that it was not apparent to him
"there was any desire for negotiation from the EU".

Reacting to Number 10's account of the discussion, European Council
President Donald Tusk warned Mr Johnson that "what's at stake is not
winning some stupid blame game".

In a tweet directed at the prime minister, Mr Tusk said: "At stake is
the future of Europe and the UK as well as the security and interests of
our people. You don't want a deal, you don't want an extension, you
don't want to revoke, quo vadis? (Latin for "Where are you going?")"

YOUTUBE: "Male Irish Jig"

http://youtu.be/wIfnbVPP3SM

DOLF @ 2229 HOURS ON 8 OCTOBER 2019: "It would seem to me that the
ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis of ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign dynamic
is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT so it is little wonder
then that the German Chancellor Angela MERKEL has become objectionable
in stating that a BREXIT deal is 'overwhelmingly unlikely'."

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>

Initial Post: 6 October 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Ted
2019-10-09 19:00:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2019-10-10 02:15:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
%
2019-10-09 21:03:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported. Because
we'll never have a truly free society until all hate speech is
permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
you don't like artie , you don't like duke , you don't like klaus ,
and you sure as fk don't like me , why do you come here ,
and why do you so desperately try to talk to the people you don't like
BeamMeUpScotty
2019-10-10 06:43:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported.
Because we'll never have a truly free society until all hate speech is
permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
Does that mean you want to eradicate LOVE SPEECH as well, they're both
used as reasons for killing people.
--
That's Karma
Ted
2019-10-10 19:02:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:43:44 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported.
Because we'll never have a truly free society until all hate speech is
permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
Does that mean you want to eradicate LOVE SPEECH as well, they're both
used as reasons for killing people.
--
That's Karma
No, absolutely not. I use love speech to help me score with women.
%
2019-10-10 19:04:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:43:44 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude >>
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI
for
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported. >>
Because we'll never have a truly free society until all hate
speech is
permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
Does that mean you want to eradicate LOVE SPEECH as well, they're
both
used as reasons for killing people.
--
That's Karma
No, absolutely not. I use love speech to help me score with women.
too bad it never worked
BeamMeUpScotty
2019-10-10 20:13:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 02:43:44 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude >>
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI
for
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported. >>
Because we'll never have a truly free society until all hate
speech is
permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
Does that mean you want to eradicate LOVE SPEECH as well, they're
both
used as reasons for killing people.
No, absolutely not. I use love speech to help me score with women.
According to Feminists... males having sex with females is violence.

Still a problem because if hate speech is illegal because it causes
violence then love speech should also be banned because of it's
propensity to cause equal violence.


Ironically Democrats don't want *violent entertainment* to be banned
because.... while they believe hearing speech causes violence they
don't believe that watching violence causes violence....

I wonder how that works?
--
That's Karma

Try to search where NANCY PELOSI got the money to pay for this
impeachment, they didn't vote for that money to be appropriated did
they? Have you heard of Republicans voting to Pay for an impeachment and
all those Millions upon Millions it will cost.... just a simple Special
Council cost us $40 Million Dollars.... How much will this Democrat
*DOG* and *PONY* *SHOW* cost us?

And pay particular attention to *WHERE THE MONEY WAS STOLEN FROM*


In Japan Kabuki is pretend, in American Liberalism they think it's real.
dolf
2019-10-10 00:35:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Stop it with the subterfuge over snipping by snipers...
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported. Because
we'll never have a truly free society until all hate speech is
permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Ted
2019-10-10 18:55:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by dolf
Stop it with the subterfuge over snipping by snipers...
Okay, sorry.
%
2019-10-10 18:59:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Stop it with the subterfuge over snipping by snipers...
Okay, sorry.
that you look
Klaus Schadenfreude
2019-10-10 10:57:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported.
I would have been insulted if you hadn't.
Because we'll never have a truly free society until all hate speech
is permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
Dang. Maybe I should have let that FBI agent that come to my door say
something, instead of burying him in my back yard.

I'll be more careful with the next one, I promise.


"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
-Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP


A very Rudy- like fantasy you have there "Ted." Tell us more about
your "reporting."

[chuckle]
Ted
2019-10-10 21:06:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:57:47 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 19:15:58 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ted
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for
hate speech.
I'm sure they got a good laugh over that.
Oh yeah? Well guess what, Klaus. You're one of those I reported.
I would have been insulted if you hadn't.
Because we'll never have a truly free society until all hate
speech
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
is permanently eradicated. I live for that day.
Dang. Maybe I should have let that FBI agent that come to my door say
something, instead of burying him in my back yard.
I'll be more careful with the next one, I promise.
What a stupid fucking thing to say. Tell ya what. Count how many guns
you have. Then multiply that number by 100,000. And that's how many
guns the FBI has.

dolf
2019-10-09 20:33:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Of course you would act against the discriminating norm and autonomy of
Post by dolf
Report them to the FBI?
Of course. I've already reported several miscreants to the FBI for hate
speech.
Report them to the FBI?
And so ends the MAXIM that the only community minded American is the one
looting after a hurricane
Post by dolf
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:27:17 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the
BUY-BACK
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party
erasing
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head.  You
need
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for
thinking the
Post by BeamMeUpScotty
wrong way.
You're guilty of hate speech, Beamie. I oughtta report you to the FBI.
— THE BREXIT / EUROPEAN UNION BLAME GAME
That if the the ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis to ROMAN
EMPIRE GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign
dynamic is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT {ie. #1080 -
HETEROS NUMBER} then all it requires is a substantiation {ie.
#38 + #73 + #111 + #117 = 3 x #111 + #6 = #339 as [#300, #30, #9] =
shᵉlêṭ (H7981): {UMBRA: #27 as #339 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *HAVE* *POWER*,
*RULE*, *DOMINEER*, *RULE* *OVER*; 1a) (P'al) *HAVE* *POWER* *UPON* *OR*
*OVER*, *RULE*, *FALL* *UPON*, *ASSAULT*, *BE* *RULER*; 1b) (Aphel)
*MAKE* *RULER*;
*TRIFECTA* of Harvest / Micro Full Moon on Friday 13 September 2019 with
As another term for EXĀCTUS (LATIN: feminine exācta, neuter exāctum,
comparative exāctior)
1) driven out, expelled, having been driven out
2) demanded, required, enforced, exacted, having been demanded
3) weighed, having been weighed
4) determined, found out, ascertained, having been determined
a) (by extension) precise, exact, accurate
5) endured, undergone, having been endured
6) (of time) spent, passed, having been spent
7) concluded, finished, completed, having been finished
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#315 / #392} / HETEROS {#265 / #367} / TORAH {#199
/ #415}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:5,col:5,nous:41&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#424 / #238} / HETEROS {#396 / #305} / TORAH {#342
/ #278}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:8,nous:14&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
} of a logical capacity by the necessity of TRINOMIAL / BINOMIAL
provision of a #491 - RULE {PATER FAMILIAS PRINCIPLE / #82 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY} + #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {LETTERS PATENT / #205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE} SAPIENT ECONOMY {#1364 / 4 = #341}
#339 - INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT BY #81 - SOVEREIGN
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;
#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;
#0 as #265 % #41 = #19} 1) behind, following, subsequent, *WESTERN*; 1a)
behind, hindermost, western (of location); 1b) later, subsequent,
latter, *LAST* (*OF* *TIME*);
#341 as [#1, #60, #80, #200] = çâphar (H5608): {UMBRA: #25 as #340 % #41
= #12} 1) to count, recount, relate; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to count (things);
1a2) to *NUMBER*, take account of, reckon; 1b) (Niphal) to be counted,
be numbered; 1c) (Piel) to recount, rehearse, declare; 1c1) to recount
(something), rehearse; 1c2) to talk; 1c3) to count exactly or
accurately; 1d) (Pual) to be recounted, be rehearsed, be related; 2)
enumerator, muster-officer, secretary, scribe; 2a) enumerator,
muster-officer, *SECRETARY*; 2b) learned man, scribe;
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}
<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>
THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).
ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY
THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY
THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.
ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS
THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>
Initial Post: 9 October 2019
— BORIS RUMOURED TO BE PROPOSING A SAPIENT ECONOMY #339 -
INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT AS #82 - SOVEREIGN
JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE (#339 - PROROGUING CRYSTALLISATION /
CAUTERISATION OF 13 TO 17 SEPTEMBER 2019) TO ENSURE THE EUROPEAN UNION
DOESN’T DANCE THE IRISH JIG UPON OUR ARMISTICE WAR GRAVES
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 8 October 2019
2019: "COMMONS SPEAKER’S POWERS COULD BE CURBED IF TORIES WIN ELECTION
The government could institute a review of the powers of the speaker of
the Commons if Conservatives win a majority at the next election, a
senior minister has suggested.
The current speaker, John Bercow, has infuriated the government with a
series of rulings, which have thrown obstacles in the way of Brexit.
Most significantly, he has allowed emergency motions under a Commons
rule known as Standing Order 24 (SO24) to be used to let MPs seize
control of the business of the house to push through legislation
limiting the PM’s room for manoeuvre.
Mr Bercow has allowed SO24 to be used to force binding votes, in a move
away from the convention that debate on emergency motions ends with a
“neutral” division stating simply that the house has considered the issue.
An SO24 motion was used to push through legislation forcing Theresa May
to seek an extension to Brexit talks in the spring, and the tactic was
employed again to facilitate the so-called Benn Act, which requires
Boris Johnson to ask for another delay if he fails to secure a deal with
parliamentary support within the next two weeks.
Mr Bercow – who many Brexiteers believe is a committed opponent of EU
withdrawal – has also permitted the use of the formerly little-known
procedure of a “*HUMBLE* *ADDRESS*” to the Queen to enable opposition
parties to force the release of secret government documents.
And he has massively increased the number of urgent questions taken in
the Commons, forcing ministers to the despatch box to face lengthy
grillings on Brexit policy.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, the minister told The Independent it
was time to consider imposing constraints on the speaker’s discretion to
interpret the rules of parliament.
“Parliament has a rulebook and it has conventions about its procedures
that have developed over a long period for a very good reason,” said the
minister.
“You can’t have someone in that position *GETTING* *UP* *IN* *THE*
*MORNING* *AND* *DECIDING* *THAT* *HE* *IS* *GOING* *TO* *DO* *THINGS*
*DIFFERENTLY* *AND* *BEND* *THE* *RULES* as he wishes.""
[<https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/speaker-powers-commons-review-election-conservative-john-bercow-a9143191.html>]
Nous: #38
Time: 05:10 hrs
Date: 2019.6.8
{%15}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#58),
   Male: #146; Feme: #58
} // #58
Dao: Consequences for Virtuous Discourse
Tetra: #11 - Divergence
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Propulsator {God who vivifies all things} Alt: Yeyazel {God
Causes a Start} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST RABIES & FIERCE ANIMALS
2. THE LEARNED, ORATORS & AUTHORS
3. PRESS, BOOKS ETC
4. Astiro
}
Solar Eclipse: 8 (UTC) / 9 June 1918 (AEST) [During World War I: 28 July
1914 to 11 November 1918]
#175 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#409 / #413} / HETEROS {#395 / #406} / TORAH {#422
/ #379}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:2,nous:38&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
hrs, Super: #409 / #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration;
I-Ching: H40 - Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21
- Release, Ego: #413 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{524}>
chârâsh (H2796): {UMBRA: #13 as #508 % #41 = #16} 1) *CRAFTSMAN*,
*ARTISAN*, *ENGRAVER*, *GRAVER*, *ARTIFICER*; 1a) graver, artificer; 1b)
*SKILFUL* *TO* *DESTROY* (*WARRIORS*) (fig.);
#524 as [#10, #3, #200, #300, #6, #5] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #2 as
#503 % #41 = #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE*
*AWAY*, *DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST*
*UP*; 1a) (Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away,
be tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust out;
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Janet.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/OATH%2020170608%201510%20-%202.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%201.jpg>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOER%2020170610%201153%20-%204.jpg>
1510 HOURS ON 8 JUNE 2017 {#413 as [#1, #30, #10, #300, #2, #70] =
ʼĔlîyshebaʻ (H472): {UMBRA: #4 as #413 % #41 = #3} 0) Elisheba = 'my God
has sworn' or 'God is an oath'; 1) Aaron's wife; *ELIZABETH*}  BY A
ON 10 JUNE 2017 (SHOWN BOTTOM LEFT / RIGHT) BEING MADE UPON THE BOER WAR
MEMORIAL ESTABLISHED 29 OCTOBER 1909 / RE-SITED 25 APRIL 1972 AS THE
ONLY SUBJECTIVE MEMORIAL OCCASION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN ABNORMAL BOER
WAR MEMORIAL #390 - WREATH PLACEMENT last upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and #312
- WITHERED STATE REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018]
NORTH KOREAN INTEROPERABILITY?
= riʼshôwn (H7223): {UMBRA: #18 as #557 % #41 = #24} 1) first, primary,
former; 1a) *FORMER* (*OF* *TIME*); 1a1) ancestors; 1a2) former things;
1b) foremost (of location); 1c) *FIRST* (*IN* *TIME*); 1d) first, chief
(in degree); 2) first, before, formerly, at first;
#553 as [#6, #30, #200, #1, #300, #10, #6] = rôʼsh (H7218): {UMBRA: #17
as #501 % #41 = #9} 1) head, top, summit, upper part, chief, total, sum,
height, front, *BEGINNING*; 1a) head (of man, animals); 1b) top, tip (of
mountain); 1c) height (of stars); 1d) chief, head (of man, city, nation,
place, family, priest); 1e) *HEAD*, *FRONT*, *BEGINNING*; 1f) chief,
choicest, best; 1g) head, division, company, band; 1h) sum;
{UMBRA: #25 as #553 % #41 = #20} 0) Elisabeth = 'oath of God'; 1) the
wife of Zacharias and mother of John the Baptist, of the priestly
family, and a relative of Mary, [Luke 1:36]
#533 as [#30, #3, #200, #300] = gârash (H1644): {UMBRA: #5 as #503 % #41
= #11} 1) *TO* *DRIVE* *OUT*, *EXPEL*, *CAST* *OUT*, *DRIVE* *AWAY*,
*DIVORCE*, *PUT* *AWAY*, *THRUST* *AWAY*, *TROUBLE*, *CAST* *UP*; 1a)
(Qal) to thrust out, cast out; 1b) (Niphal) to be driven away, be
tossed; 1c) (Piel) to drive out, drive away; 1d) (Pual) to be thrust out;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{553}>
HELSINKI ON 5 OCTOBER 2019: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said
Saturday teams from North Korea [DPRK] and the United States have
arrived in the Swedish capital Stockholm to resume discussions on
Pyongyang’s nuclear program.
[<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/north-korea-us-resume-nuclear-diplomacy-with-sweden-talks/2019/10/05/9b300c72-e765-11e9-b0a6-3d03721b85ef_story.html>]
(#83)},
20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE
PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
What is the likelihood of favourable progress upon an interoperability
the lifting of acute sanctions which might then have a ripple effect on
China / Hong Kong tensions that by comparison seems to be spiralling
into violence and lawlessness?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than [7.5] billion people in the world today, and though
we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>
[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
@A78: "[IDEA @B102 / @A76] General logic (as has already been said
several times) abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits
representations to be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may
be, so that, proceeding analytically, it can first transform these
representations into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a
manifold of sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental
pure concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without
any content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a
manifold of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless be- long to
the conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone
representations of objects can be received, and which must therefore
ever affect the concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought
demands that the manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined
in a specific manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call
this act synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., the *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [Pages 164 to 166]
(#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
{%40}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#160),
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #244; Feme: #175
} // #175
UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
- I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] / #328 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8,
#20, #5, #50] / #339 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #5, #50, #1,
#10] / #369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
{UMBRA: #42 as #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of
things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the
authors of, the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce,
bear, shoot forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self;
1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one
anything; 1g1) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *CONSTITUTE* *OR* *APPOINT* *ONE*
*ANYTHING*, *TO* *APPOINT* *OR* *ORDAIN* *ONE* *THAT*; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE*
ie.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors
of a thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do
well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to
do to one; 2c) *WITH* *DESIGNATION* *OF* *TIME*: to pass, spend; 2d) to
celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME*
*TO* *INSTITUTE*, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a
promise;
"THEN JOSEPH {INCREASE; ADDITION} BEING RAISED FROM SLEEP DID-G4160 AS
THE #246 - ANGEL OF THE LORD HAD BIDDEN HIM, AND TOOK UNTO HIM HIS
WIFE:" [Matthew 1:24]
Interoperability imply open standards AB INITIO which is a Latin term
meaning "from the beginning" and is derived from the Latin ab ("from") +
initio, ablative singular of initium ("beginning").
THUS THIS PROVISIONAL (I am reliant upon the expertise of others)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{175}&idea:{328}&idea:{339}&idea:{369}&idea:{434}>
With the #SIXTH being subject to arbitrary requirements.
AND WHEREAS WE DID ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1900: by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain POWERS, FUNCTIONS, and AUTHORITIES were
declared to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We are
desirous of making effectual and permanent provision for the office of
Governor General and Commander in chief in and over Our said
Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on each
demise of the said office. Now know ye that We have thought fit to
*CONSTITUTE*, *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, *AND* *DO* *BY* *THESE*
*PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *AND* *DECLARE*, that there shall be a
Governor General and Commander in Chief (hereinafter called the Governor
General) in and over Our Commonwealth of Australia (hereinafter called
Our said Commonwealth), and that the person who shall fill the said
office of Governor General shall be FROM *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED*
by Commission under Our Sign Manual and Signet.
[<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Queen%20Victoria%27s%20Letters%20Patent%201900.pdf>]
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Grumble-HeteroSquare-Order.jpeg>
AS THEN THE EXPRESSION OF THE #390 - SOVEREIGN'S *RESERVE* (APODIDOMI
v's DIDOMI) RIGHT IN DEPLOYING THE #45 - HETERO SQUARE SPIROGYRA ORDER
ARRAY BEING CONSISTENT WITH THE USAGE WITHIN THE GENERAL #391 -
be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia
to Ourselves Our heirs and successors, full power and authority from
*TIME* *TO* *TIME* to revoke, alter, or amend these Our Letters Patent
as to Us or them shall seem meet.
Australia Constitution Act 1900,” it is amongst other things enacted,
that we may authorise the Governor General to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to exercise, during the
pleasure of the Governor General such powers, and functions of the said
Governor General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies,
subject to any limitations expressed or directions given by Us: Now We
do hereby authorise and empower Our said Governor General subject to
such limitations and directions as aforesaid, to appoint any person or
persons, jointly or severally, to be his Deputy or Deputies within any
part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, such of his powers and functions, as he
may deem it necessary or expedient to assign to him or them: Provided
always, that the appointment of such a Deputy or Deputies shall not
affect the exercise by the Governor General himself of any power or
function.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>
[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA OF 1901 REPRESENTED BY A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL TRINOMIAL
NOUMENON AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND IN MY POSSESSION UPON ANZAC DAY
PANTOMIME '#492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL' PROTEST AND ARREST OF 25 APRIL 2006]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #40 - REVERSAL, AVOIDING
ACTIVITY; I-CHING: H36 - SUPPRESSION OF THE LIGHT, SINKING / DARKENING
LIGHT, BRILLIANCE INJURED, INTELLIGENCE HIDDEN; TETRA: 68 - DIMMING as
satisfied with itself. The use in experience to which reason limits the
pure understanding does not entirely fulfill reason’s own vocation.
Each individual experience is only a part of the whole sphere of the
domain of experience, but the absolute totality of all possible
experience is not itself an experience, and yet is still a necessary
problem for reason, for the mere representation of which reason needs
concepts entirely different from the pure concepts of the understanding,
whose use is only immanent, i.e., refers to experience insofar as such
experience can be given, whereas the concepts of reason extend to the
completeness, i.e., the collective unity of the whole of possible
experience, and in that way exceed any given experience and become
transcendent.
Hence, just as the understanding needed the categories for experience,
reason contains in itself the basis for ideas, by which I mean necessary
concepts whose object nevertheless cannot be given in any experience.
The latter are just as intrinsic to the nature of reason as are the
former to that of the understanding; and if the ideas carry with them an
illusion that can easily mislead, this illusion is inevitable, although
it can very well be prevented “from leading us astray.”
Since all illusion consists in taking the subjective basis for a
judgment to be objective, pure reason’s knowledge of itself in its
transcendent (overreaching) use will be the only prevention against the
errors into which reason falls if it misconstrues its vocation and, in
transcendent fashion, refers to the object in itself that which concerns
only its own subject and the guidance of that subject in every use that
is immanent.” [page 80]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #51 - NATURAL GUIDES AND
NURSING VIRTUOSITY; I-CHING: H47 - OPPRESSION (EXHAUSTION), CONFINING,
the usefulness of a system of categories is here revealed so clearly and
unmistakably that even if there were no further grounds of proof of that
system, this alone would sufficiently establish their indispensability
in the system of pure reason. There are no more than four such
transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories; in each
of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of the
series of conditions for a given conditioned.
In accordance with these cosmological ideas there are also only four
kinds of dialectical assertions of pure reason, which show themselves to
be dialectical because for each such assertion a contradictory one
stands in opposition in accordance with equally plausible principles of
pure reason, a conflict that cannot be avoided by any metaphysical art
of the most subtle distinctions, but that requires the philosopher to
return to the first sources of pure reason itself. This antinomy, by no
means arbitrarily contrived, but grounded in the nature of human reason
and so inevitable and never ending, contains the following four theses
together with their antitheses.
PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE}
<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?overview>
THESIS: The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary).
ANTITHESIS: The world is, as to time and space, infinite.
VOLUNTĀTIS with TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE INTERCHANGEABILITY
THESIS: Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing simple, but everything is composite.
METASTASISED CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION INTEROPERABILITY
THESIS: There exist in the world causes through freedom.
ANTITHESIS: There is no freedom, but everything is nature.
LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT AND RESOLUTION PROTOCOLS
THESIS: In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary being.
ANTITHESIS: There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent. ” [pages 90 to 91]
Nous: #25
Time: 12:50 hrs
Date: 2019.10.6
WASTING: T'ANG (#50),
AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
   Male: #108; Feme: #130
} // #130
Dao: What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious
Tetra: #10 - Defectiveness, Distortion
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing
Latin: Advitor {Infinitely good God} Alt: Rah'el {Friend of God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST ACCIDENTS, MAINTAINS HEALTH & HEALS
2. TRADE & BUSINESSMEN
3. BUSINESS
4. Asau
}
Solar Eclipse: 3 (UTC) / 4 February 1916 (AEST) [During World War I: 28
July 1914 to 11 November 1918]
#111 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#307 / #479} / HETEROS {#334 / #452} / TORAH {#334
/ #452}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:9,nous:25&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
'OVERWHELMINGLY UNLIKELY,' ANGELA MERKEL TELLS BORIS JOHNSON"
The prime minister spoke with Ms Merkel for 30 minutes this morning,
with Mr Johnson stressing that Brexit negotiations in Brussels "are
close to breaking down", Number 10 said.
The government last week unveiled its proposals for a renegotiated
Brexit deal, with the prime minister hoping this can be agreed before
the current 31 October deadline.
During the call, Mr Johnson was said to have told Ms Merkel the plans -
which would ditch the controversial Irish border backstop arrangement -
represented a "reasonable offer", but that it was not apparent to him
"there was any desire for negotiation from the EU".
Reacting to Number 10's account of the discussion, European Council
President Donald Tusk warned Mr Johnson that "what's at stake is not
winning some stupid blame game".
In a tweet directed at the prime minister, Mr Tusk said: "At stake is
the future of Europe and the UK as well as the security and interests of
our people. You don't want a deal, you don't want an extension, you
don't want to revoke, quo vadis? (Latin for "Where are you going?")"
YOUTUBE: "Male Irish Jig"
http://youtu.be/wIfnbVPP3SM
ONOMANTIC consideration of NUMBER as the basis of ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE conveying the binomial stasis of marriage / sovereign dynamic
is itself an INTEROPERABILITY AB INITIO AGREEMENT so it is little wonder
then that the German Chancellor Angela MERKEL has become objectionable
in stating that a BREXIT deal is 'overwhelmingly unlikely'."
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Get%20Go%20Agreement.pdf>
Initial Post: 6 October 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
BeamMeUpScotty
2019-10-09 14:52:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:27:17 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
Post by Ted
On Sat, 05 Oct 2019 11:42:33 -0400, default
Post by default
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:35:40 -0700, Klaus  Schadenfreude >>
I have to say, this is a damn good idea.
They can't afford a buyback. They have to save their money
for
Post by Ted
slave
Post by default
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
reparations.
That's why I'm more in favor of just rescinding the First >
Amendment.
Post by default
It was written by slave holders and intended to repress African >>
Americans.
Post by default
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Dog Turd has already proposed this once or twice now, of course
in
Post by Ted
his
Post by default
opinion (the only opinion that matters)  he should determine what
speech is to be restricted.
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Can you imagine what that would be like?
LOL. True. What a dork.
And all you have to do is use a black sharpie and redact all words
and
Post by Ted
ideas that are not acceptable to the Commi-D'crat Party line.
Take the book to the official government BUY-BACK site and get your
dollars for the words you *REDACTED* .
If you go to a LIBERAL RUN SCHOOL you also get money from the
BUY-BACK
Post by Ted
program for allowing the GOVERNMENT and the Commi-D'crat party
erasing
Post by Ted
and replacing what they consider to be banned from your head.  You
need
Post by Ted
to think the correct way or be punnished and ostracized for
thinking the
Post by Ted
wrong way.
You're guilty of hate speech, Beamie. I oughtta report you to the FBI.
I expect they already have a file somewhere with my name on it.....

Inside are 27 8x10 color glossy photos with circles and arrows and a
paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one is, to be
used against me in the next Democrat Congressional hearing as they send
Americans to the concentration and re-education camps run for them by
their Chinese and Ukrainian Contractors.....

;)
--
That's Karma
Just Wondering
2019-10-04 01:37:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
I have to say, this is a damn good idea. Hate speech is a threat to our
freedoms, and the less of it, the better. We will not have a truly free
society until all dangerous speech is banned.
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-propose-mandatory-free-speech-buyback-for-dangerous-ideas
U.S.—A number of Democratic candidates have seized on a new initiative to
make Americans feel safer: a mandatory buyback. “There are a number of
ideas out there that just make people upset when they’re said out loud,”
said presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke. “It’s time to take those ideas
off the street. That’s why it’s past time for a mandatory free speech
buyback.”
The idea that the government can take away people’s rights if it just
compensates people for them has a long history as a thing that Democrats
have proposed but not thought too deeply about. The current proposal is to
force any Americans who have scary ideas, like that there are only two
genders or that climate change isn’t a serious crisis, to sell those ideas
to the government at a fair market price so they are then no longer able to
express those views. The government will also force the sale of dangerous
media, such as making Netflix sell them the new Dave Chapelle comedy
special so it can be destroyed.
“These are ideas that serve no purpose, and we need to get them out of
public use,” stated Elizabeth Warren. “Some people may be upset, but they
shouldn’t be, because we’re paying them for their stupid ideas. Also, we’re
buying back being able to call me Pocahontas. No one needs that.”
Many have come out in opposition to this idea, such as President Trump, who
says people can take his dangerous speech from his “cold, dead mouth.” It’s
also unclear how much the government will pay to buy back free speech, but
Democrats have noted that the going rate is a penny for one’s thoughts.
That was the going rate in the sixteenth century.
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/12/origin-phrase-penny-thoughts/

With inflation, any dangerous idea I might have must be worth
at least $100. At a fair price, I love this idea. I could
get rich thinking dangerous thoughts and getting paid every
time I didn't say them.
Loading...