Discussion:
The U.S. has been ranked in the top 10 most dangerous countries for women
Add Reply
Nadegda
2019-06-10 01:44:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Just dropping this in here:

https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
%
2019-06-10 01:47:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
it doesn't seem to be hurting you any
Checkmate
2019-06-10 05:25:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
it doesn't seem to be hurting you any
Nads is a dude.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2019-06-10 06:28:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
it doesn't seem to be hurting you any
Nads is a dude.
Proof, kook?
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Checkmate
2019-06-10 06:57:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdkta3$qds$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
it doesn't seem to be hurting you any
Nads is a dude.
Proof, kook?
Drop trou and look for yourself.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
de chucka
2019-06-10 02:00:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
More guns is the answer, as it is to everything in the US
Jeff-Relf.Me @.@
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The U.S. has been ranked in the top 10 most dangerous countries for women
In poorer areas, your family is your retirement plan;
in wealthier areas, "family" is a retirement disaster, as
men lose their children, their savings, and future income to divorce.

Rich, modern countries, like South Korea, average 0.98 babies
per woman ( the Fertility Rate ); replacement level is: 2.08;
hence the "Make America Great Again" nostalgia.

Bill Gates and Warren Buffett spend 90% of their money
on the world's poorest kids, not their biological children.

Rich lesbians will get their free daycare/healthcare,
and "white male oppressors" will remain a minority in universities.

When women "go their own way", society applauds;
when men do it, I clap alone.

I won't play a game designed by a "democracy" ( the hysterical mob );
money is silly, health is everything.
benj
2019-06-10 15:17:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Jeff-Relf.Me @.@
The U.S. has been ranked in the top 10 most dangerous countries for women
In poorer areas, your family is your retirement plan;
in wealthier areas, "family" is a retirement disaster, as
men lose their children, their savings, and future income to divorce.
Rich, modern countries, like South Korea, average 0.98 babies
per woman ( the Fertility Rate ); replacement level is: 2.08;
hence the "Make America Great Again" nostalgia.
Bill Gates and Warren Buffett spend 90% of their money
on the world's poorest kids, not their biological children.
Rich lesbians will get their free daycare/healthcare,
and "white male oppressors" will remain a minority in universities.
When women "go their own way", society applauds;
when men do it, I clap alone.
I won't play a game designed by a "democracy" ( the hysterical mob );
money is silly, health is everything.
When Nads becomes the Bundu and runs the world, they will hunt you down
and kill you, Rolf! And only then will women be safe in America and not
have to worry about being sexually harassed by toxic patriarchal males
by asking for their phone numbers or out for a drink! EEEW! Disgusting!

The funniest thing about Lesbians is that all they know it hate and
venom toward men, and yet they dress in men's clothes and strut around
trying "act like" men. Only they have NO idea what it is to be a man so
they end up imitating all the jerkiest male behavior on the planet. Too
funny for words!
Beedle
2019-06-10 03:51:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
What did you expect for a third-world shit-hole like the United States?
--
Beedle
Checkmate
2019-06-10 05:25:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdkcmf$qds$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2019-06-10 06:29:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and the
fuckers who enable and cover for them.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Checkmate
2019-06-10 07:01:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdktcv$qds$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and the
fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh ever raped anybody, you sick misandrist
fuck. It's Libtards who slander innocent men for political gain, and
fuckers like you who enable them... now FOAD!
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2019-06-10 08:16:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and the
fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.

Don't believe me? See for yourself:

https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en

Lesser authorities who agree include:

https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470

https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/

http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-know-it/

"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn’t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn’t a court of
law, it’s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
“reasonable doubt,” before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
“Caesar’s Wife” standard: One can’t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It’s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don’t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn’t do it, those surveys are x% think he’s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn’t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question “Do you think he did it?” there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally “yeah, I think he did.”
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they’d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."

Indeed his type is well known:

https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/

It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2019-06-10 08:49:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdl3kv$1ceh$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and the
fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-know-it/
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Would you happen to have a source with any actual proof, or just some links
to randoms parroting completely unfounded accusations? This is why I know
your so-called science credentials are total bullshit. Scientists insist on
proof before they draw conclusions. You're just a morally bankrupt,
dishonest little whackjob of a troll.

Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party. I hope
she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable life.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2019-06-10 09:15:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party. I hope
she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable life.
"Complicit".
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2019-06-10 09:53:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdl740$1s7h$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party. I hope
she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable life.
"Complicit".
Excellent projection, Paul.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2019-06-10 10:05:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party. I hope
she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable life.
"Complicit".
Excellent projection, Paul.
Who is "Paul", ko0ky? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
vallor
2019-06-10 20:29:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party. I
hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable
life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.

https://www.thedailybell.com/all-articles/editorials/wendy-mcelroy-beware-of-kafkatrapping/
--
-v
Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛
2019-06-10 21:07:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On 10 Jun 2019 20:29:35 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; vallor <***@cultnix.org>
determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently
decided to freely share it with us in
<***@mid.individual.net>:

✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:15:43 +0200, kensi wrote:
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 6/10/2019 4:49 AM, 💩 wrote:
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 💩! In article <qdl3kv$1ceh$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party. I
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ life.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ "Complicit".
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ https://www.thedailybell.com/all-articles/editorials/wendy-mcelroy-bewar
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ e-of-kafkatrapping/
✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡

maybe check out some of the lovely articles from the questionable source you provided:

https://www.thedailybell.com
--
[THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION]

THIS SPACE FOR RENT


"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <***@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <***@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
kensi
2019-06-11 03:45:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party. I
hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable
life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail; same
credibility level, i.e. 0.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
%
2019-06-11 03:47:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party.  I
hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her miserable
life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail; same
credibility level, i.e. 0.
have you been assaulting your boner
vallor
2019-06-11 07:09:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced
with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail; same
credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
--
-v
Nadegda
2019-06-11 07:12:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced
with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail; same
credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.

Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Checkmate
2019-06-11 07:29:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdnk94$qds$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced
with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail; same
credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
vallor
2019-06-11 08:42:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-
predators/
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when
faced with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely,
a slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist
Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail;
same credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable
to have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony
meters after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.

I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.

I also have high regard for John Adams' mindset when it came to
jurisprudence and justice. When the Boston Massacre happened, the
soldiers went on trial, and _nobody_ wanted to be their attorney. Adams
decided, as a matter of principle, that the soldiers deserved fair
representation as a human right, so he took the job.

"Nads": Go read about a real patriot, why don't you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams

So when I see fallacies, I point them out, more likely as not --
especially if the person emitting the fallacy is smarmy to a fault.
--
-v
kensi
2019-06-11 09:12:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.
You linked a far-right website in "support" of your attack on women's
rights. That article was anti-feminist and the site as a whole is about
as sane and informative as a howling writhing bag of rabid raccoons.

Why did you cite it? Most likely because nothing on the left or even the
center would support your position re: Kavanaugh.
Post by vallor
I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.
So, you're a misogynist but you're also a NeverTrumper. Were you
expecting to get a cookie for that?
Post by vallor
So when I see fallacies, I point them out, more likely as not --
especially if the person emitting the fallacy is smarmy to a fault.
It's Brett Kavanaugh who is smarmy to a fault. Someone in a prison
jumpsuit needs to slap that smirk right off his face. After he gets a
fair trial, of course, with a proper process rather than his rich and
connected right-wing pals getting to control the investigation and the
prosecution.

Which reminds me: Mitch McConnell should probably get locked up too, for
obstruction if not for accessory to rape after the fact, for that sham
show he put on during the confirmation hearings.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
vallor
2019-06-11 09:24:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.
You linked a far-right website in "support" of your attack on women's
rights.
I made no such attack.
Post by kensi
That article was anti-feminist and the site as a whole is about
as sane and informative as a howling writhing bag of rabid raccoons.
Well, excuse me for not vetting the site -- I just googled the term and
slapped the first site I saw (which probably popped up because it is
cited in the article on fallacies on Wikipedia).

If I thought "Kensi" was honest about it, I would post the article and go
over it with a fine-toothed comb. But I think "she's" just playing a
delaying game.
Post by kensi
Why did you cite it?
I'd like to think it was for education, but given the absolute madness
pouring forth from the loyal opposition, I think I'll just say it was "to
piss "Kensi" off."

(Worked well too, didn't it?)
Post by kensi
Most likely because nothing on the left or even the
center would support your position re: Kavanaugh.
I made no comment whatsoever regarding Kavanaugh.
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.
So, you're a misogynist
I defy anyone to show where I have been a misogynist. This is just name-
calling and game-playing by the one that calls him/herself "Kensi".

Fuck off, Paul.
--
-v
kensi
2019-06-12 03:33:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.
You linked a far-right website in "support" of your attack on women's
rights.
I made no such attack.
You defended Kavanaugh, a rapist. That is an attack on women's rights.
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
That article was anti-feminist and the site as a whole is about
as sane and informative as a howling writhing bag of rabid raccoons.
Well, excuse me for not vetting the site -- I just googled the term and
slapped the first site I saw (which probably popped up because it is
cited in the article on fallacies on Wikipedia).
So, your excuse is that you were too lazy to take even a cursory look at
the site to make sure it was something sane rather than the output of
howler monkeys?
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Why did you cite it?
I'd like to think it was for education, but given the absolute madness
pouring forth from the loyal opposition, I think I'll just say it was "to
piss "Kensi" off."
Not exactly a noble motive. But you are still madly trying to deflect
and distract from the fact that you jumped into an argument to defend
the pro-rape side.
Post by vallor
(Worked well too, didn't it?)
Considering that I'm sitting here laughing at this whole ridiculous
k00kdance from you and Checkmate as you furiously try to backpedal after
discovering that yeah, leaping to the defense of probable rapists has
bad optics, rather than steamed about your silly namecalling and
pointless posturing? I'd say you've failed as spectacularly at that as
you failed at a) defending Kavanaugh and then b) trying to divert
attention away from the fact that you were defending Kavanaugh.
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Most likely because nothing on the left or even the
center would support your position re: Kavanaugh.
I made no comment whatsoever regarding Kavanaugh.
Perhaps not directly, or intentionally, but you jumped into an argument
between me and Checkmate in which the latter was (again) defending the
rapist, and you took Checkmate's side in that fight.
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.
So, you're a misogynist
I defy anyone to show where I have been a misogynist.
Leaping to the defense of a (likely) rapist and dismissing the harrowing
stories of the three (3) victims who came forward is misogynist, ko0ky.
Post by vallor
This is just name-calling and game-playing by the one that calls him/herself
"Kensi".
Aww, hell, not *another* one. Hey Nadegda! Where is the cabal storage
facility for spare irony meters?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2019-06-12 06:39:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdprpk$n4i$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...

[Everything but the finest of bullshit snipped]
...You defended Kavanaugh, a rapist.
(unproven and libelous)
...the pro-rape side.
(Unproven and libelous)
...probable rapists
Now "probable"? Make up your libelous libtard mind.
...defending the rapist,
(Again, unproven and libelous)
...defense of a (likely) rapist
Now "likely"? Make up your libelous libtard mind.
...dismissing the harrowing stories of the three (3) victims
ALLEGED "victims" who should be charged with perjury.


Again, you prove yourself to be hysterical, dishonest, and lacking in any
integrity whatsoever. I'm surprised you didn't go as far as accusing
Kavanaugh of raping you too. If there were even a scintilla of evidence
from any of those three loons, Kavanaugh wouldn't be sitting on the Supreme
Court today. If only I could teleport your sleazy ass to Salem, MA in
1692...
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2019-06-12 06:51:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
[Everything but the finest of bullshit snipped]
...You defended Kavanaugh, a rapist.
(unproven and libelous)
...the pro-rape side.
(Unproven and libelous)
...probable rapists
Now "probable"? Make up your libelous libtard mind.
...defending the rapist,
(Again, unproven and libelous)
...defense of a (likely) rapist
Now "likely"? Make up your libelous libtard mind.
Do let me know when your kooksoot against kensi is filed, and then the
case number to access all of the filings. I need a replacement comedy show
now that The Big Bang Theory has wound up.

<snicker>
Post by Checkmate
...dismissing the harrowing stories of the three (3) victims
ALLEGED "victims" who should be charged with perjury.
(Unproven and libelous)
Post by Checkmate
Again, you prove yourself to be hysterical, dishonest, and lacking in
any integrity whatsoever.
... says the kook who just accused, without evidence, three people of
lying under oath.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go make an appointment with the
repairman to come fix my irony meter.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Skeeter
2019-06-11 13:58:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <qdnraf$1kn2$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.
You linked a far-right website in "support" of your attack on women's
rights. That article was anti-feminist and the site as a whole is about
as sane and informative as a howling writhing bag of rabid raccoons.
Why did you cite it? Most likely because nothing on the left or even the
center would support your position re: Kavanaugh.
Post by vallor
I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.
So, you're a misogynist but you're also a NeverTrumper. Were you
expecting to get a cookie for that?
Post by vallor
So when I see fallacies, I point them out, more likely as not --
especially if the person emitting the fallacy is smarmy to a fault.
It's Brett Kavanaugh who is smarmy to a fault. Someone in a prison
jumpsuit needs to slap that smirk right off his face. After he gets a
fair trial, of course, with a proper process rather than his rich and
connected right-wing pals getting to control the investigation and the
prosecution.
Which reminds me: Mitch McConnell should probably get locked up too, for
obstruction if not for accessory to rape after the fact, for that sham
show he put on during the confirmation hearings.
Still no proof Kavanaugh did anything against the law.
Michael Tilden
2019-06-11 12:05:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-
predators/
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when
faced with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely,
a slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist
Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail;
same credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable
to have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony
meters after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.
I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.
I'm not sure if Trump has done anything crooked or broken any laws since
he became president, probably not, however there is no doubt that as a
big business man his past is littered with scams and schemes. There is
no way he could operate in NYC as a developer if he wasn't greasing
palms left and right.
They all do it.

I voted Trump mainly because Hillary and the Clintons are full time
crooks and it would have been like having Ma Barker and her gang in the White
House.

Most politicians are crooked, but the Clintons take it to an entirely
new level.

Also Trump isn't draining the swamp, he's just dredging it to make room
for his own swamp creatures, the NY bankers and other connected
financial people.
That is going to cost him votes.
--
Michael Tilden
Try Linux It's free and it's a lot of fun.
www.linuxmint.com
kensi
2019-06-12 03:42:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Tilden
I voted Trump mainly because Hillary and the Clintons are full time
crooks and it would have been like having Ma Barker and her gang in the White
House.
And now you have Pa Barker and *his* gang in the White House. Good job!
Not only didn't you make the White House any less crooked, it's likely
*worse* than it would have been, *and* you threw women, LGBTQ, and
minorities under the bus into the bargain!
Post by Michael Tilden
Most politicians are crooked, but the Clintons take it to an entirely
new level.
You misspelled "the Trumps".
Post by Michael Tilden
Also Trump isn't draining the swamp, he's just dredging it to make room
for his own swamp creatures, the NY bankers and other connected
financial people.
Don't forget shady Russian ex(?)-KGB figures and questionable Turks,
Saudis, and others associated with repressive governments. Kushner seems
to be dithering between whether to sell out the USA to the Saudis or
instead to the Chinese. Anti-Semitic hate crimes are on the rise, along
with violence against women and LGBT people, and Mexicans are being
herded into camps.

And none of this should come as any kind of a surprise. Trump made clear
throughout the campaign exactly what he was, and how he and his family
would operate. He *started* the campaign with racist remarks directed
against Mexicans and Muslims and surrounded himself with white
supremacists, anti-Semites, and assorted shady business characters, half
of them Russian. All of this was as plain as the nose on your face well
before election day. Which means you voted for it -- all of it. You
voted for Mexicans to be sent to concentration camps, you voted to strip
women of reproductive autonomy, you voted for people to shoot up
synagogues, not to mention for a shady cabal of Russian, Saudi, and
other foreign authoritarian oligarchs to become our shadow Cabinet while
robber-barons who'd make the 19th century railroad tycoons blush took
over the non-shadow Cabinet.

Everyone who voted for Trump is a traitor to the United States of
America and complicit in war crimes, crimes that are steadily escalating
even as we speak.

You ought to be ashamed of yourself!
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2019-06-12 06:56:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdpsbq$p8e$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Michael Tilden
I voted Trump mainly because Hillary and the Clintons are full time
crooks and it would have been like having Ma Barker and her gang in the White
House.
And now you have Pa Barker and *his* gang in the White House. Good job!
Not only didn't you make the White House any less crooked, it's likely
*worse* than it would have been, *and* you threw women, LGBTQ, and
minorities under the bus into the bargain!
Post by Michael Tilden
Most politicians are crooked, but the Clintons take it to an entirely
new level.
You misspelled "the Trumps".
Post by Michael Tilden
Also Trump isn't draining the swamp, he's just dredging it to make room
for his own swamp creatures, the NY bankers and other connected
financial people.
Don't forget shady Russian ex(?)-KGB figures and questionable Turks,
Saudis, and others associated with repressive governments. Kushner seems
to be dithering between whether to sell out the USA to the Saudis or
instead to the Chinese. Anti-Semitic hate crimes are on the rise, along
with violence against women and LGBT people, and Mexicans are being
herded into camps.
And none of this should come as any kind of a surprise. Trump made clear
throughout the campaign exactly what he was, and how he and his family
would operate. He *started* the campaign with racist remarks directed
against Mexicans and Muslims and surrounded himself with white
supremacists, anti-Semites, and assorted shady business characters, half
of them Russian. All of this was as plain as the nose on your face well
before election day. Which means you voted for it -- all of it. You
voted for Mexicans to be sent to concentration camps, you voted to strip
women of reproductive autonomy, you voted for people to shoot up
synagogues, not to mention for a shady cabal of Russian, Saudi, and
other foreign authoritarian oligarchs to become our shadow Cabinet while
robber-barons who'd make the 19th century railroad tycoons blush took
over the non-shadow Cabinet.
Everyone who voted for Trump is a traitor to the United States of
America and complicit in war crimes, crimes that are steadily escalating
even as we speak.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself!
That's quite a Fountain O' Froth, KooKster. I had to archive that one for
future entertainment. Two words: Sea Kelp...
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Checkmate
2019-06-11 19:19:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-
predators/
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when
faced with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely,
a slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist
Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail;
same credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable
to have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony
meters after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.
I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.
I also have high regard for John Adams' mindset when it came to
jurisprudence and justice. When the Boston Massacre happened, the
soldiers went on trial, and _nobody_ wanted to be their attorney. Adams
decided, as a matter of principle, that the soldiers deserved fair
representation as a human right, so he took the job.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams
So when I see fallacies, I point them out, more likely as not --
especially if the person emitting the fallacy is smarmy to a fault.
I've noticed that you're one of the few people in here who can remain
objective, even when the point in question doesn't align with your personal
views. You must find it especially frustrating when attempting to carry on
a rational discussion with The Nadsington. I've found it to be an exercise
in futility. I can't count the number of times I've put a fair amount of
effort into presenting a reasoned discussion with either the Kensi half or
the Nads half, only to see them completely ignore any shred of logic, and
continue to push their same old tired narrative, selectively snipping my
argument, and only occasionally bothering to provide a link to something
someone *else* said on some fringe website, as their defense of their
position. I've often wondered how someone who claims to be a scientist, can
completely abandon any semblance to accepted scientific thinking methods at
all. I can only conclude that beyond a minimal entertainment value, it's a
fruitless endeavor to engage with either of them.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 19:23:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-
predators/
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when
faced with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely,
a slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist
Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail;
same credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable
to have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony
meters after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
Having a fallacy-free debate doesn't mean I'm "supporting" or
"sympathizing with" Trump or any "political right". "Nads" is mistaken.
I think Trump and his cronies have screwed the pooch and belong behind
bars.
I also have high regard for John Adams' mindset when it came to
jurisprudence and justice. When the Boston Massacre happened, the
soldiers went on trial, and _nobody_ wanted to be their attorney. Adams
decided, as a matter of principle, that the soldiers deserved fair
representation as a human right, so he took the job.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams
So when I see fallacies, I point them out, more likely as not --
especially if the person emitting the fallacy is smarmy to a fault.
I've noticed that you're one of the few people in here who can remain
objective, even when the point in question doesn't align with your personal
views. You must find it especially frustrating when attempting to carry on
a rational discussion with The Nadsington. I've found it to be an exercise
in futility. I can't count the number of times I've put a fair amount of
effort into presenting a reasoned discussion with either the Kensi half or
the Nads half, only to see them completely ignore any shred of logic, and
continue to push their same old tired narrative, selectively snipping my
argument, and only occasionally bothering to provide a link to something
someone *else* said on some fringe website, as their defense of their
position. I've often wondered how someone who claims to be a scientist, can
completely abandon any semblance to accepted scientific thinking methods at
all. I can only conclude that beyond a minimal entertainment value, it's a
fruitless endeavor to engage with either of them.
someone pooped his pants
kensi
2019-06-12 03:44:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
[snip]
Post by Checkmate
continue to push their same old tired narrative, selectively snipping my
argument, and only occasionally bothering to provide a link to something
someone *else* said on some fringe website,
How ironic, seeing as how the guy who was just caught linking to a
fringe website was none other than "vallor".
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
kensi
2019-06-11 09:02:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?

Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
chrisv
2019-06-11 12:13:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
all this because
You are lying. That's not the reason.
--
'I have noted before how the herd sees me as a god... now one has
come right out and referred to me as a "creator"... another term for
God. And *none* of the herd will call him out on it.' - some thing
Snit
2019-06-11 14:59:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by chrisv
all this because
You are lying. That's not the reason.
-- 'I have noted before how the herd sees me as a god... now one has
come right out and referred to me as a "creator"... another term for
God. And *none* of the herd will call him out on it.' - some thing
Another trolling post from you. Wow.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2019-06-11 15:02:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Snit
Post by chrisv
all this because
You are lying. That's not the reason.
-- 'I have noted before how the herd sees me as a god... now one has
come right out and referred to me as a "creator"... another term for
God. And *none* of the herd will call him out on it.' - some thing
Another trolling post from you. Wow.
Shit, where's all the smoke coming from.... Oh, darn,
it's my irony meter melting down.
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda and kensi » the twain are easily ignored
feminist bigots and America-hating, lying leftists.
chrisv
2019-06-11 15:37:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by Snit
Post by chrisv
-- 'I have noted before how the herd sees me as a god... now one has
come right out and referred to me as a "creator"... another term for
God. And *none* of the herd will call him out on it.' - some thing
Another trolling post from you. Wow.
Shit, where's all the smoke coming from.... Oh, darn,
it's my irony meter melting down.
Hehe.

Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator" (of some computer content), which is another term for God.

Sheesh.

The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person
who called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
--
"I noted he had *gasp!* an outdated calendar and razzed him briefly
for it." - some thing, shamelessly lying about what the issue in
contention was.
vallor
2019-06-11 16:25:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by chrisv
Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator"
(of some computer content), which is another term for God.
Sheesh.
The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person who
called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
--
"I noted he had *gasp!* an outdated calendar and razzed him briefly for
it." - some thing, shamelessly lying about what the issue in
contention was.
Thank you for archiving these -- they put the lie to s*it's "honest and
honorable" claim.
--
-v
Snit
2019-06-11 16:30:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
Post by chrisv
Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator"
(of some computer content), which is another term for God.
Sheesh.
The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person who
called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
--
"I noted he had *gasp!* an outdated calendar and razzed him briefly for
it." - some thing, shamelessly lying about what the issue in
contention was.
Thank you for archiving these -- they put the lie to s*it's "honest and
honorable" claim.
I am repeatedly accused of doing things well beyond what I could. What
anyone could in some cases. Look at the context.

But keep in mind chrisv is clearly upset and lashing out about some debate
I cannot even recall. I find that pathetic of him.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
chrisv
2019-06-11 16:49:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
Post by chrisv
Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator"
(of some computer content), which is another term for God.
Sheesh.
The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person who
called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
--
"I noted he had *gasp!* an outdated calendar and razzed him briefly for
it." - some thing, shamelessly lying about what the issue in
contention was.
Thank you for archiving these -- they put the lie to s*it's "honest and
honorable" claim.
I think that, to this day, that thing claims that it can't be quoted
lying. So, I quote it lying.
--
"[Tattoo Vampire] makes up stories about EXIF data changing based on
what date you open or download a file." - some thing, lying
shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
Michael Tilden
2019-06-11 17:23:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by chrisv
Post by vallor
Post by chrisv
Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator"
(of some computer content), which is another term for God.
Sheesh.
The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person who
called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
--
"I noted he had *gasp!* an outdated calendar and razzed him briefly for
it." - some thing, shamelessly lying about what the issue in
contention was.
Thank you for archiving these -- they put the lie to s*it's "honest and
honorable" claim.
I think that, to this day, that thing claims that it can't be quoted
lying. So, I quote it lying.
Believing it's own lies is yet another classic trait of a psychopath.
--
Michael Tilden
Try Linux It's free and it's a lot of fun.
www.linuxmint.com
Snit
2019-06-11 17:31:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Tilden
Post by chrisv
Post by vallor
Post by chrisv
Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator"
(of some computer content), which is another term for God.
Sheesh.
The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person who
called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
--
"I noted he had *gasp!* an outdated calendar and razzed him briefly for
it." - some thing, shamelessly lying about what the issue in
contention was.
Thank you for archiving these -- they put the lie to s*it's "honest and
honorable" claim.
I think that, to this day, that thing claims that it can't be quoted
lying. So, I quote it lying.
Believing it's own lies is yet another classic trait of a psychopath.
And yet you claim to believe yours.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
kensi
2019-06-12 03:46:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Tilden
Believing it's own lies is yet another classic trait of a psychopath.
How ironic, coming from a Trump voter.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2019-06-12 06:57:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdpsi4$p8e$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Michael Tilden
Believing it's own lies is yet another classic trait of a psychopath.
How ironic, coming from a Trump voter.
You seem to live in a forest of irony, to hear you tell it.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Michael Tilden
2019-06-11 17:20:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by vallor
Post by chrisv
Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator"
(of some computer content), which is another term for God.
Sheesh.
The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person who
called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
--
"I noted he had *gasp!* an outdated calendar and razzed him briefly for
it." - some thing, shamelessly lying about what the issue in
contention was.
Thank you for archiving these -- they put the lie to s*it's "honest and
honorable" claim.
Executed perfectly.
--
Michael Tilden
Try Linux It's free and it's a lot of fun.
www.linuxmint.com
Snit
2019-06-11 16:28:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by chrisv
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by Snit
Post by chrisv
-- 'I have noted before how the herd sees me as a god... now one has
come right out and referred to me as a "creator"... another term for
God. And *none* of the herd will call him out on it.' - some thing
Another trolling post from you. Wow.
Shit, where's all the smoke coming from.... Oh, darn,
it's my irony meter melting down.
Hehe.
Apparently, I deserve a "wow" from some thing who posts ridiculous
nonsense like the above "the herd sees me as a god". Its claim is
supported, you see, by the fact that someone referred to it as a
"creator" (of some computer content), which is another term for God.
Sheesh.
The above lying nonsense is bad-enough, of course. Incredibly, that
thing goes-on to attack "the herd" for not "calling out" the person
who called it a "creator", as if its interpretation of the comment, as
another term for God, was honest and honorable.
You are obsessing again.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
Snit
2019-06-11 16:28:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
Post by Snit
Post by chrisv
all this because
You are lying. That's not the reason.
-- 'I have noted before how the herd sees me as a god... now one has
come right out and referred to me as a "creator"... another term for
God. And *none* of the herd will call him out on it.' - some thing
Another trolling post from you. Wow.
Shit, where's all the smoke coming from.... Oh, darn,
it's my irony meter melting down.
Any topic you want to discuss other than your desire to troll?
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
Checkmate
2019-06-11 19:31:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdnqnv$1hd4$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.

There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 19:37:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
Checkmate
2019-06-11 20:03:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 20:08:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
then why are you bothering to try
Checkmate
2019-06-11 20:10:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
then why are you bothering to try
I'm not. I'm saying Nadsington can't prove a positive.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 20:13:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
then why are you bothering to try
I'm not. I'm saying Nadsington can't prove a positive.
oh is that what she can't do
Just Wondering
2019-06-11 20:11:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients".  Not one
of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you.  (I just almost
gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
then why are you bothering to try
Sometimes you can prove a negative. You assume the negative
is true, then prove it leads to an impossible result.
But that doesn't work here.
%
2019-06-11 20:14:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible
"evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients".  Not one
of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you.  (I just almost
gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
then why are you bothering to try
Sometimes you can prove a negative.  You assume the negative
is true, then prove it leads to an impossible result.
But that doesn't work here.
that's the whole point of saying prove it here
Checkmate
2019-06-11 21:24:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are
unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right,
has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients".  Not one
of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you.  (I just almost
gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
then why are you bothering to try
Sometimes you can prove a negative.  You assume the negative
is true, then prove it leads to an impossible result.
But that doesn't work here.
No... that doesn't work here.
Post by %
that's the whole point of saying prove it here
Now you're going to pretend you actually had a point?
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 21:27:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are
unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right,
has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
I'd say you're about as honest as Hillary Clinton.
So vallor thinks I'm dishonest, you think Nadegda's dishonest, and all
this because what, both of us believe the THREE women who came forward
to relate awful tales of Kavanaugh's sexual abuse?
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients".  Not one
of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you.  (I just almost
gagged on my
keyboard).
there's also no proof he didn't just as there's no proof you didn't
You can't prove a negative.
then why are you bothering to try
Sometimes you can prove a negative.  You assume the negative
is true, then prove it leads to an impossible result.
But that doesn't work here.
No... that doesn't work here.
Post by %
that's the whole point of saying prove it here
Now you're going to pretend you actually had a point?
oh is that what i'm going to do
kensi
2019-06-12 03:49:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
that's the whole point of saying prove it here
Now you're going to pretend you actually had a point?
%? Having a point? You've *got* to be joking.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2019-06-12 07:04:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdpsoq$p8e$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
that's the whole point of saying prove it here
Now you're going to pretend you actually had a point?
%? Having a point? You've *got* to be joking.
Even HE knows he doesn't.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
kensi
2019-06-12 03:48:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
Nicely foamed, and an excellent demonstration of exactly my point. But
it doesn't answer the question: *why* are so many right-wingers so
emotionally invested in defending Kavanaugh?
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
Checkmate
2019-06-12 07:03:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdpsls$p8e$***@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence" of
anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that Sweatnik clown,
who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was ever anywhere near
Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was "represented" by that Avenatti
publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer in a federal penitentiary for numerous
incidents of fraud and theft of money from his "clients". Not one of these
so-called "witnesses" was able to offer any proof of any of their
confabulations, or any corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's
closest lifelong friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than there would
be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just almost gagged on my
keyboard).
Nicely foamed, and an excellent demonstration of exactly my point. But
it doesn't answer the question: *why* are so many right-wingers so
emotionally invested in defending Kavanaugh?
Probably because we haven't forgotten the simple fact that people are
considered innocent in this country until proven guilty. From some of the
shit you conjure up, I'm pretty certain you're a witch... how 'bout that?
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Nadegda
2019-06-12 07:12:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
Post by kensi
Why *are* so many right-wingers so emotionally invested in defending
Kavanaugh, anyway?
For the umpteenth time, none of them offered any credible "evidence"
of anything, and two of them later recanted... especially that
Sweatnik clown, who had priors for lying, had no proof that she was
ever anywhere near Kavanaugh, or even knew him, oh... and was
"represented" by that Avenatti publicity whore and soon-to-be lifer
in a federal penitentiary for numerous incidents of fraud and theft
of money from his "clients". Not one of these so-called "witnesses"
was able to offer any proof of any of their confabulations, or any
corroborating witnesses, including Christine Ford's closest lifelong
friend.
There was no more "proof" that Kavanaugh ever raped anyone, than
there would be "proof" if you decided to claim I raped you. (I just
almost gagged on my keyboard).
Nicely foamed, and an excellent demonstration of exactly my point. But
it doesn't answer the question: *why* are so many right-wingers so
emotionally invested in defending Kavanaugh?
Probably because we haven't forgotten the simple fact that people are
considered innocent in this country until proven guilty.
Tell that to Trayvon Martin. Or Michael Brown, or Freddie Gray, or
Philando Castile, or Tamir Rice, or Eric Garner ...

Oh, wait, you can't, because they are all dead by summary execution.

On the other hand, rich white dudes are apparently innocent until proven
guilty, with the gotcha that rich white dudes are almost never even
brought to trial for their crimes.

Nice double standard you have there. But I don't know why *you* are
defending it, seeing as how though you may be white you sure as hell
aren't rich.

Why do you carry water for these people? What have they ever done for
*you*?
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Skeeter
2019-06-11 13:57:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <qdnk94$qds$***@dont-email.me>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by vallor
Post by kensi
Post by Checkmate
Post by kensi
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced
with the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
Christine Blase Ford is either a delusional KooK, or more likely, a
slanderer who profited by lying for the Democratic Socialist Party.
I hope she gets hounded everywhere she goes for the rest of her
miserable life.
"Complicit".
Lovely Kafkatrapping you have there, Paul.
Who?
Post by vallor
https://www.thedailybell.com/<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
Right wing koOkshit3. It might as well have been the Daily Fail; same
credibility level, i.e. 0.
You are a very dishonest person, and I have determined you are unable to
have a rational conversation.
So, it's *not* just Skeetard who is capable of destroying my irony meters
after all.
Nobody citing right-wing links to "support" their claims, or exhibiting
any other support or sympathy for Trump and the political right, has *any*
business calling anybody else "dishonest" *or* "irrational".
You post nothing but opinion, post proof.
mixed nuts
2019-06-10 13:43:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Scientists insist on proof before they draw conclusions.
People say that scientists lie to get billions off the hard working
taxpayer, at least that's what I hear.
--
Grizzly H.
%
2019-06-10 13:48:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by mixed nuts
Scientists insist on proof before they draw conclusions.
People say that scientists lie to get billions off the hard working
taxpayer, at least that's what I hear.
so does rexall drugs
Siri Cruise
2019-06-10 14:31:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by mixed nuts
Scientists insist on proof before they draw conclusions.
People say that scientists lie to get billions off the hard working
taxpayer, at least that's what I hear.
KILL THE SCIENT-- scientists or scientologists?
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
chrisv
2019-06-10 14:56:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by mixed nuts
Scientists insist on proof before they draw conclusions.
People say that scientists lie to get billions off the hard working
taxpayer, at least that's what I hear.
Oh, of course. In general, scientists are much less interested in the
truth, compared to the "businessman", most of whom would happily sell
you a lethal dose of opiates, if they would make a dollar.
--
"See, now there's a photo that isn't crap. Well done!' - "-hh",
admiring a photo of chrisv's rear-end
Nadegda
2019-06-11 06:48:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL

And re: Kavanaugh:

LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn’t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn’t a court of
law, it’s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
“reasonable doubt,” before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
“Caesar’s Wife” standard: One can’t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It’s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don’t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn’t do it, those surveys are x% think he’s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn’t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question “Do you think he did it?” there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally “yeah, I think he did.”
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they’d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
--
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
Checkmate
2019-06-11 07:15:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <qdnisb$qds$***@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
Dare to dream big!
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Skeeter
2019-06-11 13:56:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <qdnisb$qds$***@dont-email.me>, ***@gmail.invalid
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Checkmate
2019-06-11 19:59:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 20:05:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Checkmate
2019-06-11 20:09:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Is that a fact?
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 20:12:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Is that a fact?
no because there isn't any
Just Wondering
2019-06-11 20:14:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett
Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice. "What difference, at this
point, does it make?" - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
%
2019-06-11 20:18:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different ,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ,
ditzy spin headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
Just Wondering
2019-06-11 20:37:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this
ditzy spin headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
So it's something like this: (from "Hee Haw" TV show)

%
2019-06-11 20:41:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ditzy spin
headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
So it's something like this:  (from "Hee Haw" TV show)
http://youtu.be/yMV7Zpl_xoU
i'll have to take your word for it i don't go to posted youtubes
Just Wondering
2019-06-11 21:18:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ditzy spin
headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
So it's something like this:  (from "Hee Haw" TV show)
http://youtu.be/yMV7Zpl_xoU
i'll have to take your word for it i don't go to posted youtubes
Your loss, not my problem.
%
2019-06-11 21:22:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett
Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ditzy spin
headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
So it's something like this:  (from "Hee Haw" TV show)
http://youtu.be/yMV7Zpl_xoU
i'll have to take your word for it i don't go to posted youtubes
Your loss, not my problem.
it's nothing to take personal and not seeing something is usenet is not
a loss
Checkmate
2019-06-11 21:27:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett
Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ditzy spin
headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
So it's something like this:  (from "Hee Haw" TV show)
http://youtu.be/yMV7Zpl_xoU
i'll have to take your word for it i don't go to posted youtubes
Yes you do, all the time.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 21:33:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett
Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ditzy spin
headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
So it's something like this:  (from "Hee Haw" TV show)
http://youtu.be/yMV7Zpl_xoU
i'll have to take your word for it i don't go to posted youtubes
Yes you do, all the time.
is that the lie you're going to tell about me to everyone today
Checkmate
2019-06-12 01:22:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
is that the lie you're going to tell about me to everyone today
This needed trimming.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
Checkmate
2019-06-11 21:26:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate! In article <***@news.alt.net>, ***@gmail.com
says...
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different ,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ,
ditzy spin headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
You're burbling quite a bit today.
--
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2019
all rights reserved

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017
%
2019-06-11 21:32:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
says...
Post by %
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
i don't see where anyone said it makes anything different ,
and the reason it was posted is because there is this ,
ditzy spin headed female that uses it to troll in a rerunned manner
You're burbling quite a bit today.
toot
Snit
2019-06-11 21:20:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
Guilty or not, he went out of his way to present himself as unfit for
the office he has.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
%
2019-06-11 21:23:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
Guilty or not, he went out of his way to present himself as unfit for
the office he has.
plus he's a cheap drunk he only drinks beer
Snit
2019-06-11 21:28:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
Guilty or not, he went out of his way to present himself as unfit for
the office he has.
plus he's a cheap drunk he only drinks beer
Fair enough.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
%
2019-06-11 21:34:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
Guilty or not, he went out of his way to present himself as unfit for
the office he has.
plus he's a cheap drunk he only drinks beer
Fair enough.
do you know the checkmate
Snit
2019-06-11 21:35:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by %
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett
Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
Guilty or not, he went out of his way to present himself as unfit
for the office he has.
plus he's a cheap drunk he only drinks beer
Fair enough.
do you know the checkmate
I have seen checkmate. And I have been check mated.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Just Wondering
2019-06-12 04:38:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
Guilty or not, he went out of his way to present himself as unfit for
the office he has.
Please cite the cases where he made decisions contrary to the
facts and the law.
Snit
2019-06-12 06:14:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Snit
Post by %
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Post by Checkmate
says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by kensi
Post by Nadegda
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and
the fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh<NUTKICK!>
Word of God is that yes, Brett Kavanaugh is a rapist.
https://twitter.com/thegoodgodabove/status/1044342586620735489?lang=en
LOL
LOCK HIM UP!
Post by kensi
https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist/130470
https://www.lifenews.com/2018/09/25/jim-carrey-says-entitled-little-s-
brett-kavanaugh-is-a-rapist-partying-his-way-to-supreme-court/
Post by kensi
http://www.wearethedog.com/2018/10/10/kavanagh-is-a-rapist-and-we-all-
know-it/
Post by kensi
"And while the argument has been raised that it hasn?t been proven
beyond a reasonable doubt, let us remember that this isn?t a court of
law, it?s a nomination for a position to rule over the toughest cases
our legal system faces, and the standard needs to be higher than
?reasonable doubt,? before you get that appointment. It needs to be the
?Caesar?s Wife? standard: One can?t just be never convicted, one has to
never even appear to be guilty.
And the other, uncomfortable point about that is, nobody who watched
Kavanaugh testify has any reasonable doubt. It?s like the old joke about
the survey about high school boys masturbating: 85% admitted they did,
and 15% were lying. I don?t care what the percentages are on whether or
not people think Kavanaugh didn?t do it, those surveys are x% think he?s
guilty, and the other y% are lying.
I have talked to a few people who argue he wasn?t convicted in a court
of law, and therefore should get the benefit of the doubt, and the odd
thing is when I pose the direct question ?Do you think he did it?? there
is a long pause, some deflection, and finally ?yeah, I think he did.?
We all know who this guy is. Women recognize him from past experience
with assholes like him, and men recognize him as that one asshole in the
group they?d never leave alone with their girlfriend or sister.
We all know Kavanaugh. And we all know he is a rapist."
https://yesmeansyesblog.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/meet-the-predators/
It ends with this note: "if you are loyal to them even when faced with
the evidence of what they do, you are complicit."
That last article is fascinating, kensi. Bookmarked so I too can spnak
kooks with it some day.
I still haven't seen proof that Kavanaugh is guilty. Care to point it
out?
Some crazy bitch said so, so it must be so.
i haven't seen any that says he's not guilty
Kavanaugh is a US Supreme Court Justice.  "What difference, at this
point, does it make?"  - Hiliary Rodham Clinton
Guilty or not, he went out of his way to present himself as unfit for
the office he has.
Please cite the cases where he made decisions contrary to the
facts and the law.
Please read what I wrote and stop asking for things I never said.

But you can’t. You feel the need to change topics. That demonstrates you
realize he showed himself as I said.

No you go into denial and try to say this is somehow an example of
correlation being seen as causation — your favorite phrase you do not
understand.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.
mixed nuts
2019-06-10 12:08:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
Post by Checkmate
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
@gmail.invalid says...
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
No, you sick racist fuck, it's privileged men like Brett Kavanaugh and the
fuckers who enable and cover for them.
There's no proof that Kavanaugh ever raped anybody, you sick misandrist
fuck. It's Libtards who slander innocent men for political gain, and
fuckers like you who enable them... now FOAD!
Plus, he's a christian who really likes beer very very much which fully
exonerates him - total blue collar!
--
Grizzly H.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2019-06-10 15:42:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Checkmate
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
It's all those damned illegal border-jumping rapists.
Not even an illegal alien on steroids would stoop
to raping Nads. LOL!
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda and kensi » the twain are easily ignored
feminist bigots and America-hating, lying leftists.
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.
2019-06-10 15:41:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Nadegda
https://www.newsweek.com/us-top-10-most-dangerous-countries-women-
report-995229
Why drop a wrapped and borked link?
--
Yours Truly, Sir Gregory

Nadegda and kensi » the twain are easily ignored
feminist bigots and America-hating, lying leftists.
Loading...