Discussion:
"Gun" fondlers
(too old to reply)
Baxter
2015-04-14 15:04:19 UTC
Permalink
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.

http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
--
-----------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-----------------------------------------------------
max headroom
2015-04-14 15:32:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?

But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-04-14 19:38:34 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."

Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.

But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?

What's Baxter thinking of?

Using them as golf clubs?

At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it comes
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule





"Your 'individual liberty' is not worth anything, and if it is 'big
brotherism" to care about people, we need a lot more of it."
-Baxter
Broadcasting From the Collective
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-14 19:45:20 UTC
Permalink
"Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."

Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.

But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?

What's Baxter thinking of?

####
Like Rudy, and Deep Doodoo... PENISES!
RD Sandman
2015-04-14 21:14:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
####
Like Rudy, and Deep Doodoo... PENISES!
Other than his.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-04-14 23:46:48 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:14:21 -0500, RD Sandman
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
####
Like Rudy, and Deep Doodoo... PENISES!
Other than his.
Well, he probably can't see his any more, so......
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-15 16:07:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
####
Like Rudy, and Deep Doodoo... PENISES!
Other than his.

#####
Possibly.
Hard to tell what's running amok in the head of a sick mind.
Rudy Canoza
2015-04-15 01:12:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
####
Like me... PENISES!
When *don't* you think of them, jailbird?
--
Your first duty is to th' country...is to th' flag, and then...and then
th' army,
and then to...and then to god. Flag, Army, God - F.A.G.

Mark Wieber
75th Rangers, 1971-1973
Scout
2015-04-17 04:14:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
####
Like Rudy, and Deep Doodoo... PENISES!
Makes you wonder why they are always trying to grab other people's....
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-04-17 10:51:08 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:14:10 -0400, "Scout"
Post by Scout
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
####
Like Rudy, and Deep Doodoo... PENISES!
Makes you wonder why they are always trying to grab other people's....
Hell, he had to make a special post about it.
max headroom
2015-04-17 14:26:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:14:10 -0400, "Scout"
Post by Scout
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don't know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
####
Like Rudy, and Deep Doodoo... PENISES!
Makes you wonder why they are always trying to grab other people's....
Hell, he had to make a special post about it.
I wish you guys would change the Subject line of this thread... it's making me feel guilty of
neglect.
Just Wondering
2015-04-14 21:12:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it comes
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
RD Sandman
2015-04-14 22:13:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes,
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's
actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it comes
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Just Wondering
2015-04-15 01:33:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes,
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it comes
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
RD Sandman
2015-04-15 15:22:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes,
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it comes
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Hmmmm, didn't he also say "Life is like a box of chocolates."
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-15 16:00:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes,
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it comes
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Hmmmm, didn't he also say "Life is like a box of chocolates."


#####
No, His Mother said that.
RD Sandman
2015-04-15 16:05:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes,
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it
comes
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Hmmmm, didn't he also say "Life is like a box of chocolates."
#####
No, His Mother said that.
Oh, well, with him it is sometimes difficult to tell which one is which.
;)
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-15 16:20:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes,
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it
comes
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Hmmmm, didn't he also say "Life is like a box of chocolates."
#####
No, His Mother said that.
Oh, well, with him it is sometimes difficult to tell which one is which.
;)


###
Forrest Gump's mom was never shot in the Buttocks with a gun!
RD Sandman
2015-04-15 16:50:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know
the
Post by RD Sandman
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by max headroom
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes,
Post by RD Sandman
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by max headroom
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose
and
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it
comes
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Hmmmm, didn't he also say "Life is like a box of chocolates."
#####
No, His Mother said that.
Oh, well, with him it is sometimes difficult to tell which one is which.
;)
###
Forrest Gump's mom was never shot in the Buttocks with a gun!
Good thing you added those last three words.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-15 20:01:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know
the
Post by RD Sandman
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by max headroom
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes,
Post by RD Sandman
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by max headroom
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose
and
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it
comes
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Hmmmm, didn't he also say "Life is like a box of chocolates."
#####
No, His Mother said that.
Oh, well, with him it is sometimes difficult to tell which one is which.
;)
###
Forrest Gump's mom was never shot in the Buttocks with a gun!
Good thing you added those last three words.

###
I try to think...of those last three words!
Just Wondering
2015-04-15 18:00:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:32:21 -0700, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the
difference and this is a central problem in the process of
redefining the purpose and availability of firearms in America.
Men, whether intentional or not, tend to confuse their guns for
their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more masculine they
are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis substitutes,
and the phallic similarities are obvious.
Does that mean that, when my girlfriend shoots my gun, she's actually horny?
But thanks for the link-- that was hilarious!
I didn't realize we were in the midst of "redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America."
Now, of course, there should be more firearms available to get the
cost down. Anyone with any sense agrees with that.
But redefining the purpose? How can you get away from the fact that
they're made for shooting?
What's Baxter thinking of?
Using them as golf clubs?
At any rate, liberals shouldn't be assigned to this task for the
simple reason that they're so incredibly fucking stupid when it
comes
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Post by Just Wondering
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
to guns, Baxter not being an exception to this rule
They even think AR-15's are scary "assault weapons" that should be
banned while leaving the Mini 14 alone as a legitimate varmint gun.
Interesting, no?
In the words of Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does."
Hmmmm, didn't he also say "Life is like a box of chocolates."
Lennon/McCarthy said, "Happiness is a warm gun."
Rudy Canoza
2015-04-14 15:57:41 UTC
Permalink
[hysterical anti-gun bullshit]
There are no "gun fondlers". That's just your snarky juvenile smear.
--
Your first duty is to th' country...is to th' flag, and then...and then
th' army,
and then to...and then to god. Flag, Army, God - F.A.G.

Mark Wieber
75th Rangers, 1971-1973
Just Wondering
2015-04-14 18:01:23 UTC
Permalink
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to
remove all doubt." You just removed all doubt.
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-14 18:05:01 UTC
Permalink
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to
remove all doubt." You just removed all doubt.

#####
Butt, Baxter does know dick, eh?
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-04-14 19:10:40 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:04:19 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
Unfortunately, it appears to be you that confuses firearms with a
penis.

Why is that, Baxter?
Post by Baxter
and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
It is if you spend a lot of time thinking about a penis, like you do.

Why is that, Baxter?
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-14 19:34:59 UTC
Permalink
"Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:04:19 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
Unfortunately, it appears to be you that confuses firearms with a
penis.

Why is that, Baxter?
and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
It is if you spend a lot of time thinking about a penis, like you do.

Why is that, Baxter?

####
Baxter USED to have a working penis, before his Uncle/Mom bit it off in a
fit of orgasmic bliss.
Now they both have pictures of large caliber pistols... and poodles!
RD Sandman
2015-04-14 21:12:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the
gun/penis, the more masculine they are. Guns have become penis
extensions, if not penis substitutes, and the phallic similarities are
obvious.
http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
A politically based OPED column. That's a real unfailing source. LOL!!

Damn, couldn't you find a cartoon?
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Just Wondering
2015-04-14 21:35:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the
gun/penis, the more masculine they are. Guns have become penis
extensions, if not penis substitutes, and the phallic similarities are
obvious.
http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
A politically based OPED column. That's a real unfailing source. LOL!!
Damn, couldn't you find a cartoon?
How 'bout a movie scene?



Meanwhile, back in real life:
http://youtu.be/jts0xxg7P8I
"When a female corrections officer at Kingsport jail performed a search
on 19-year-old Dallas Archer, she allegedly discovered an "unknown
object" lodged in the young woman's crotch. She alerted another female
officer, who accompanied her during a further examination ... The
officers allegedly discovered a loaded, five-shot, four-inch .22 caliber
mini-revolver concealed in Archer's vagina."
Just Wondering
2015-04-15 01:31:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by RD Sandman
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the
gun/penis, the more masculine they are. Guns have become penis
extensions, if not penis substitutes, and the phallic similarities are
obvious.
http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
A politically based OPED column. That's a real unfailing source. LOL!!
Damn, couldn't you find a cartoon?
How 'bout a movie scene?
http://youtu.be/418Und1srFM
http://youtu.be/jts0xxg7P8I
http://youtu.be/jts0xxg7P8I
Apologies, I didn't copy the link correctly.
Here's the right one.

Post by Just Wondering
"When a female corrections officer at Kingsport jail performed a search
on 19-year-old Dallas Archer, she allegedly discovered an "unknown
object" lodged in the young woman's crotch. She alerted another female
officer, who accompanied her during a further examination ... The
officers allegedly discovered a loaded, five-shot, four-inch .22 caliber
mini-revolver concealed in Archer's vagina."
Rudy Canoza
2015-04-14 22:03:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by RD Sandman
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the
gun/penis, the more masculine they are. Guns have become penis
extensions, if not penis substitutes, and the phallic similarities are
obvious.
http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
A politically based OPED column.
A left-wing fuck writing in a left-wing rag blog.

Wikipedia:

"About Cesca, Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks [himself an ultra-left fuck]
has said that 'Bob's writing is totally fearless. That's what I love
about it.' In 2013, after whistle-blower Edward Snowden revealed NSA
overreach, Cenk said, 'Bob is good guy, smart guy, I like him, but ...
there isn't anything Obama does that [Bob] wouldn't jump to the
immediate, enormous and 110% defense of.'"
--
Your first duty is to th' country...is to th' flag, and then...and then
th' army,
and then to...and then to god. Flag, Army, God - F.A.G.

Mark Wieber
75th Rangers, 1971-1973
Bert
2015-04-14 22:51:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises.
Well, no.

It's only people like you who make that mistake, which is why you became
a gun grabber.
--
***@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
Just Wondering
2015-04-15 01:31:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bert
Post by Baxter
Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises.
Well, no.
It's only people like you who make that mistake, which is why you became
a gun grabber.
Meanwhile, in the real world people like this confuse a certain other
body part for a gun holster.
http://youtu.be/7nzZBku88iw
Bunny Brunel
2015-04-15 14:27:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises.
Well, no.

It's only people like you who make that mistake, which is why you became
a gun grabber.


#####
My bet ,(and my money is on the table), is that Baxter is a Penis Grabber as
well... and not just his own!
So why does Baxter only think MEN have or should own guns due to dick size?

What about Females? ( Something BAXTER is REALLY afraid of!)
Does female gun ownership mean a woman's clitoris or tits are and can be
too small, or large ?
According to "Baxter", He said that ones genitalia and other body parts
determines what weapon you are suited for.

Using Baxter's criteria, he should only need a napkin.
RD Sandman
2015-04-15 15:19:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bert
Post by Baxter
Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises.
Well, no.
It's only people like you who make that mistake, which is why you became
a gun grabber.
Aaah, he is trying to get a hold of a substitute penis. Gotcha.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
One Party System
2015-04-15 03:15:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the
gun/penis, the more masculine they are. Guns have become penis
extensions, if not penis substitutes, and the phallic similarities are
obvious.
http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
You are such a useless, uninformed knob.
--
There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don’t want the patient
to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an
easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make
themselves prominent before the public.

Booker T. Washington
slate_leeper
2015-04-15 11:04:20 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:04:19 +0000 (UTC), Baxter
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
Really?

There is no viable argument for the penis theory as against pragmatic
explanations for gun ownership. Psychiatrist Bruce Danto rejects the
penis theory because it fails to account for female gun ownership. In
fact, 50% of those who own a gun for protection only are women
(especially black women), even though women are much less likely than
men to own guns for sport.{43} To say the very least, this pattern is
more easily explicable by reference to women's felt need for
protection than by feelings of penile inadequacy.

Dr. Danto also notes that the penis theory would predict that male gun
owners would be inclined toward the largest barrel and bore weapons
available. But the respective popularity of guns of different sizes
uniformly appears to reflect purely pragmatic concerns.{44} The penis
theory is equally incapable of explaining other demographic
differentials in gun ownership. When all gun owners are counted (not
just those who own for protection alone) survey evidence shows that

gun owners are disproportionately rural, Southern, male,
Protestant, affluent and middle class... [and that] weapons ownership
tends to increase with income, or occupational prestige, or both.{45}

A final point of interest is Dr. Tanay's citation of Freud's view that
weapons may symbolize the penis in dreams. This, Freud says, is true
of dreams involving any long object (e.g. "sticks, umbrellas, poles,
trees") but especially of objects that may be viewed as penetrating,
and injuring ("knives, daggers, lances, sabers; firearms are similarly
used...."). This passage refers to dreams in general without
distinguishing gun owners from others. Dr. Tanay is perhaps unaware of
-- in any event he does not cite -- other passages more relevant to
his argument. In these other passages Freud associates retarded
sexual/emotional development not with gun ownership, but with fear and
loathing of weapons.{49} The probative importance that ought to attach
to the views of Freud is, of course, a matter of opinion. The point
here is only that those views provide no support for the penis theory
of gun ownership.


Lets repeat these again:
Freud associates retarded sexual/emotional development not with gun
ownership, but with fear and loathing of weapons.
And:
weapons ownership tends to increase with income, or occupational
prestige, or both.


By the way,
Survey of gun owners by Carol K. Oyster, Ph.D., University of
Wisconsin, 1998:
Bachelors or advanced degree: 68% of women and 51% of men.
(average of American population, 25%)



-dan z-
--
Protect your civil rights!
Let the politicians know how you feel.
Join or donate to the NRA today!
http://membership.nrahq.org/default.asp?campaignid=XR014887

Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.
Scout
2015-04-17 04:13:03 UTC
Permalink
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don't know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
And thus Baxter gives reign to his ignorance and bigotry yet again....
benj
2015-04-17 05:27:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don't know the difference and
this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose and
availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or not, tend
to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the gun/penis, the more
masculine they are. Guns have become penis extensions, if not penis
substitutes, and the phallic similarities are obvious.
And thus Baxter gives reign to his ignorance and bigotry yet again....
Baxter gets wood looking at "gun shapes"? Oh man! Those Lib women are
even uglier than I thought! Give the guy a break. He hasn't gotten any
for who knows how long.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
One Party System
2015-04-18 12:52:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baxter
Unfortunately, too many pro-gun American men don’t know the difference
and this is a central problem in the process of redefining the purpose
and availability of firearms in America. Men, whether intentional or
not, tend to confuse their guns for their penises. The bigger the
gun/penis, the more masculine they are. Guns have become penis
extensions, if not penis substitutes, and the phallic similarities are
obvious.
http://tinyurl.com/mkfkcub
So when rational arguments fail, this is your fall back position?

Pathetic. Your obsession with penises is defintily a sign of immaturity.
--
There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don’t want the patient
to get well, because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an
easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to
make themselves prominent before the public.

Booker T. Washington
Loading...