Discussion:
Castle Doctrine under fire in Montana
(too old to reply)
unknown
2014-12-12 13:41:54 UTC
Permalink
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html

I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some beer.
So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open and waited
with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the dark. The last
(and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he was running from the
garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming Castle Doctrine and just
how in fear he was for his life.

I hope they put this guy away for life.

Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the past,
at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to own guns.
This is more evidence why we need background checks.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-12 14:05:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some beer.
Incorrect as usual.

At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
Post by unknown
So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open and waited
with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the dark. The last
(and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he was running from the
garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming Castle Doctrine and just
how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the past,
at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to own guns.
This is more evidence why we need background checks.
You own guns. What's the difference?
rbowman
2014-12-12 15:00:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.

There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
unknown
2014-12-12 15:03:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-12 15:05:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.

You left that part out, for some reason.
news13
2014-12-13 01:54:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't been
committing a criminal act.
As he didn't survive, we only have one view of that.
As he was shot in the back to kill, it makes that less likely.

There are a few reasons why he might have entered someomne else's
property other than to commit a "crime". The guy is no going to have to
disprove all of those in court.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-13 11:41:16 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 01:54:12 +0000 (UTC), news13
Post by news13
Post by unknown
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't been
committing a criminal act.
As he didn't survive, we only have one view of that.
What do you suppose he was doing there? Another "lost" exchange
student? LOL
Post by news13
As he was shot in the back to kill, it makes that less likely.
Um, no, it doesn't.
Post by news13
There are a few reasons why he might have entered someomne else's
property other than to commit a "crime".
Really. What are they. Make yourself look even more dumb and list
them.
Lamont Schlong
2014-12-14 22:15:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by news13
There are a few reasons why he might have entered someomne else's
property other than to commit a "crime".
The nice Muslim boy was going to paint the guy's car? Return his
lawnmower? looking for a dark place to pray to Allah?
Gronk
2014-12-14 23:53:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
David J. Hughes
2014-12-15 10:15:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
GOP_Decline_and_Fall
2014-12-15 11:40:08 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:15:10 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
Time to drag out the crooked bankers from their counting houses
then...huh?
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-15 12:36:31 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 03:40:08 -0800, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:15:10 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
Time to drag out the crooked bankers from their counting houses
then...huh?
Having trouble following the thread again, eh?
David J. Hughes
2014-12-15 16:45:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 04:15:10 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
Time to drag out the crooked bankers from their counting houses
then...huh?
Long since time, it's one of those tasks that needs to be done every 5
to 10 years.
visualization
2014-12-15 17:15:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by GOP_Decline_and_Fall
Post by David J. Hughes
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
Time to drag out the crooked bankers from their counting houses
then...huh?
Madoff is in a "counting house"?
Gronk
2014-12-20 21:24:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?

Aren't ALL crimes things that violate the "compact that allows people to
live together peacefully"? Don't we have a legal system that decides the
punishment? Why isn't death the sentence for all acts of theft then?

What are you Taliban? Death for every crime?
Scout
2014-12-20 22:34:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Because his victims couldn't reasonably determine that he was ONLY a thief
or that he wasn't reasonably going to visit search harm or even death upon
them.

That this needs to be explained to you is worrisome since it seems to
indicate you're not aware or simply don't care about the possible danger to
innocent people when threatened in such a manner.
Gunner Asch
2014-12-21 00:13:50 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 17:34:56 -0500, "Scout"
Post by Scout
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Because his victims couldn't reasonably determine that he was ONLY a thief
or that he wasn't reasonably going to visit search harm or even death upon
them.
That this needs to be explained to you is worrisome since it seems to
indicate you're not aware or simply don't care about the possible danger to
innocent people when threatened in such a manner.
Gronk is one of those Lefties who somewhat functions on a greatly
reduced number of brain cells. Without supervision of friends and
family to support him...he would die in a ditch somewhere because of
his own actions.

Shrug

Gunner

"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child,
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
PJ O'Rourke
Gronk
2014-12-21 20:33:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 17:34:56 -0500, "Scout"
Post by Scout
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Because his victims couldn't reasonably determine that he was ONLY a thief
or that he wasn't reasonably going to visit search harm or even death upon
them.
That this needs to be explained to you is worrisome since it seems to
indicate you're not aware or simply don't care about the possible danger to
innocent people when threatened in such a manner.
Gronk is one of those Lefties who somewhat functions on a greatly
reduced number of brain cells. Without supervision of friends and
family to support him...he would die in a ditch somewhere because of
his own actions.
Mark is one of those gun fondlers who had to make a public retraction
of calls for mass murder. Without the supervision of law enforcement
he would be an item on the news.
Gronk
2014-12-25 03:40:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Because his victims couldn't reasonably determine that he was ONLY a thief
or that he wasn't reasonably going to visit search harm or even death upon
them.
That this needs to be explained to you is worrisome since it seems to
indicate you're not aware or simply don't care about the possible danger
to innocent people when threatened in such a manner.
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?

Typical low cognitive prowess of the gun fondler set.

http://www.winknews.com/2014/12/18/self-defense-fails-in-montana-mans-murder-trial/
Just days before he killed a 17-year-old German exchange student, Markus
Kaarma told hairstylists he had been waiting up to shoot some kids who
were burglarizing homes.

He told them they would see it on the news.

Kaarma hoped to bait an intruder by leaving his garage door partially open
and placing a purse inside, Montana prosecutors said. And when he did, a
motion detector alerted him early April 27. Kaarma took a shotgun outside
and almost immediately fired four blasts into the garage. Diren Dede,
unarmed, was hit twice. He died after the final shot hit him in the head.
rbowman
2014-12-25 04:52:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
PaxPerPoten
2014-12-25 08:50:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently
when one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one
may also expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster
rbowman
2014-12-25 19:15:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by PaxPerPoten
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently
when one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one
may also expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
You need to stay out of Montana. The bar isn't very high but we do have
minimal standards for the use of deadly force. Proactive execution because
you think someone might be a threat doesn't get it. Actually having eyes on
the target helps a lot in establishing that you perceived a threat.

We can argue until we get sick of it, but that's the reality. If you've ever
taken a CCW course, the instructor probably explained to you how to shoot
someone and not wind up on trial yourself, if not in so many words.
bigdog
2014-12-25 23:33:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by PaxPerPoten
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently
when one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one
may also expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
Just fire two warning shots into his chest, then one into the ceiling. Who's going to know the order they were fired?
Gronk
2014-12-28 20:48:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by PaxPerPoten
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently
when one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one
may also expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
Just fire two warning shots into his chest, then one into the ceiling. Who's going to know the order they were fired?
When no weapon on the other is found.
Gronk
2014-12-28 20:47:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently when
one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one may also
expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
And where is shooting randomly justified?
David J. Hughes
2014-12-29 02:22:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently when
one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one may also
expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
And where is shooting randomly justified?
Nowhere.
Executing a thief, however:

Code of Ur-Nammu, 4000 + years ago
If a man commits a robbery, he will be killed.

Code of Hammurabi, 3800 years ago
"If any one is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be
put to death."

Judicial executions for Robbery, US, 1938
Mack Davidson
Adolph Smith
Alvin Taylor
Roscoe Young

Current Texas Penal Code, Section 2, Chapter 9
SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY

Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful
possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using
force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably
believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the
other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.

(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable
property by another is justified in using force against the other when
and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately
necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses
the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when
he dispossessed the actor; or

(2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or
fraud against the actor.

Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in
using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable
property:

(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
Section 9.41; and

(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is
immediately necessary:

(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
mischief during the nighttime; or

(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
from escaping with the property; and

(3) he reasonably believes that:

(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other
means; or

(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the
land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk
of death or serious bodily injury.
Gronk
2015-01-02 00:37:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently when
one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one may also
expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
And where is shooting randomly justified?
Nowhere.
Then you're done.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Ur-Nammu, 4000 + years ago
If a man commits a robbery, he will be killed.
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Hammurabi, 3800 years ago
"If any one is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put
to death."
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Judicial executions for Robbery, US, 1938
1938.

LOL
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-01-02 00:39:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently when
one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one may also
expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
And where is shooting randomly justified?
Nowhere.
Then you're done.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Ur-Nammu, 4000 + years ago
If a man commits a robbery, he will be killed.
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Hammurabi, 3800 years ago
"If any one is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put
to death."
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Judicial executions for Robbery, US, 1938
1938.
LOL
The part Gronk couldn't address restored:

Current Texas Penal Code, Section 2, Chapter 9
SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY

Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful
possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using
force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably
believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate
the
other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the
property.

(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable
property by another is justified in using force against the other when
and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is
immediately
necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor
uses
the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when
he dispossessed the actor; or

(2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat,
or
fraud against the actor.

Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in
using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible,
movable
property:

(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
Section 9.41; and

(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is
immediately necessary:

(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
mischief during the nighttime; or

(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
from escaping with the property; and

(3) he reasonably believes that:

(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other
means; or

(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the
land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
risk
of death or serious bodily injury.
Gronk
2015-01-05 01:17:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently when
one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one may also
expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
And where is shooting randomly justified?
Nowhere.
Then you're done.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Ur-Nammu, 4000 + years ago
If a man commits a robbery, he will be killed.
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Hammurabi, 3800 years ago
"If any one is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put
to death."
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Judicial executions for Robbery, US, 1938
1938.
LOL
The part you couldn't address restored: 1938
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-01-05 13:27:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
It can also get an armed assailant to throw lead your way. Apparently when
one assumes the risk of illegally entering someones domicile, one may also
expect instant justice up to and including mortal extinction.
Thus leaving the world a better place.
And where is shooting randomly justified?
Nowhere.
Then you're done.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Ur-Nammu, 4000 + years ago
If a man commits a robbery, he will be killed.
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Code of Hammurabi, 3800 years ago
"If any one is committing a robbery and is caught, then he shall be put
to death."
Irrelevant.
Post by David J. Hughes
Judicial executions for Robbery, US, 1938
1938.
LOL
The part you couldn't address restored: 1938
What part of 1938 couldn't you refute?
benj
2014-12-26 03:59:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
Also gets the attention of the criminal who immediately kills you.

There is a reason anyone breaking into your home is automatically
assumed armed, dangerous, and ready to kill you at a moments notice.

Gronk is obviously an idiot. Don't join him.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
rbowman
2014-12-26 06:52:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
There is a reason anyone breaking into your home is automatically
assumed armed, dangerous, and ready to kill you at a moments notice.
Gronk is obviously an idiot. Don't join him.
I'm tired of this threat, but please review the facts of the case.
Gronk
2014-12-28 20:49:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
Also gets the attention of the criminal who immediately kills you.
There is a reason anyone breaking into your home is automatically assumed
armed, dangerous, and ready to kill you at a moments notice.
Gronk is obviously an idiot. Don't join him.
Is this why the guy is awaiting sentencing? Are you going to visit him in
jail?
Gronk
2014-12-28 20:45:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
The prevailing opinion is just racking a pump shotgun tends to get peoples'
attention.
And nobody gets killed, or convicted

http://abcnews.go.com/US/montana-man-markus-kaarma-found-guilty-slaying-german/story?id=27658993

Markus Kaarma has been found guilty in the slaying of 17-year-old German
exchange student Diren Dede, whom he shot after the teen wandered into
Kaarma’s Grant Creek, Montana, garage.

Kaarma had claimed that he killed the teenager inside his garage this
spring out of fear for the safety of his family. Montana law allows a
homeowner to protect himself with deadly force if threatened. Prosecutors
say Kaarma bragged about wanting to "shoot some kids" and left his garage
door open, baiting a would-be robber.
PaxPerPoten
2014-12-25 08:30:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Scout
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Because his victims couldn't reasonably determine that he was ONLY a thief
or that he wasn't reasonably going to visit search harm or even death upon
them.
That this needs to be explained to you is worrisome since it seems to
indicate you're not aware or simply don't care about the possible danger
to innocent people when threatened in such a manner.
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
Not a good idea. Perpetrator might be a drugged up weapon carrier also.
Every cop knows that crazed criminals can get off a kill shot if given
the opportunity. I can't find a better reason for a criminal to avoid
robbing someone ..is to know the possibility of getting ones ass shot off.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/uj0mtxXEGE8?autoplay=1
Post by Gronk
Typical low cognitive prowess of the gun fondler set.
http://www.winknews.com/2014/12/18/self-defense-fails-in-montana-mans-murder-trial/
Post by Gronk
Just days before he killed a 17-year-old German exchange student, Markus
Kaarma told hairstylists he had been waiting up to shoot some kids who
were burglarizing homes.
So what...That damned sure should have been fair warning. Keep in mind
we used to hang cattle thieves without benefit of trial.
Post by Gronk
Typical low cognitive prowess of the gun fondler set.
http://www.winknews.com/2014/12/18/self-defense-fails-in-montana-mans-murder-trial/
Just days before he killed a 17-year-old German exchange student, Markus
Kaarma told hairstylists he had been waiting up to shoot some kids who
were burglarizing homes.
He told them they would see it on the news.
Kaarma hoped to bait an intruder by leaving his garage door partially
open and placing a purse inside, Montana prosecutors said. And when he
did, a motion detector alerted him early April 27. Kaarma took a shotgun
outside and almost immediately fired four blasts into the garage. Diren
Dede, unarmed, was hit twice. He died after the final shot hit him in
the head.
--
It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard
the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all
ages who mean to govern well, but *They mean to govern*. They promise to
be good masters, *but they mean to be masters*. Daniel Webster
rbowman
2014-12-25 19:07:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by PaxPerPoten
So what...That damned sure should have been fair warning. Keep in mind
we used to hang cattle thieves without benefit of trial.
The Montana Highway Patrol still has 3-7-77 on their patch and on the side
of their cars. It's said it refers to a grave 3 feet wide, 7 feet deep, and
77 inches long, but we're sort of trying to get past that part of the
state's history:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Vigilantes

Maybe things weren't all that different back in the day. Henry Plummer, the
sheriff of Bannock, was one of the crooks that had an abrupt termination to
his life.
Gronk
2014-12-28 20:47:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by PaxPerPoten
Post by Gronk
Post by Scout
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead
Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Because his victims couldn't reasonably determine that he was ONLY a thief
or that he wasn't reasonably going to visit search harm or even death upon
them.
That this needs to be explained to you is worrisome since it seems to
indicate you're not aware or simply don't care about the possible danger
to innocent people when threatened in such a manner.
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
Not a good idea. Perpetrator might be a drugged up weapon carrier also.
Every cop knows that crazed criminals can get off a kill shot if given the
opportunity. I can't find a better reason for a criminal to avoid robbing
someone ..is to know the possibility of getting ones ass shot off.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/uj0mtxXEGE8?autoplay=1
Post by Gronk
Typical low cognitive prowess of the gun fondler set.
http://www.winknews.com/2014/12/18/self-defense-fails-in-montana-mans-murder-trial/
Post by Gronk
Just days before he killed a 17-year-old German exchange student, Markus
Kaarma told hairstylists he had been waiting up to shoot some kids who
were burglarizing homes.
So what...That damned sure should have been fair warning. Keep in mind we
Say what? How is that fair warning?
Post by PaxPerPoten
used to hang cattle thieves without benefit of trial.
Mob rule.
Post by PaxPerPoten
Post by Gronk
Typical low cognitive prowess of the gun fondler set.
http://www.winknews.com/2014/12/18/self-defense-fails-in-montana-mans-murder-trial/
Just days before he killed a 17-year-old German exchange student, Markus
Kaarma told hairstylists he had been waiting up to shoot some kids who
were burglarizing homes.
He told them they would see it on the news.
Kaarma hoped to bait an intruder by leaving his garage door partially
open and placing a purse inside, Montana prosecutors said. And when he
did, a motion detector alerted him early April 27. Kaarma took a shotgun
outside and almost immediately fired four blasts into the garage. Diren
Dede, unarmed, was hit twice. He died after the final shot hit him in
the head.
Bert
2015-01-05 16:59:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
A) Firing a "warning shot" will likely get you arrested.

B) Firing a warning shot, instead of shooting your attacker, is
generally viewed as evidence that you really had no fear of being
attacked yourself.
--
***@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
Gunner Asch
2015-01-05 19:19:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bert
Post by Gronk
So, a warning shot was beyond the guy's mental capabilities?
A) Firing a "warning shot" will likely get you arrested.
B) Firing a warning shot, instead of shooting your attacker, is
generally viewed as evidence that you really had no fear of being
attacked yourself.
Correct and correct.

Warning shots are taught against in all police academies, all law
enforcement academies and ALL CCW classes across the US.

The only warning shots to be fired are directly between the neck and
belt buckle. Period. End program. Full stop.

Gunner

"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child,
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
PJ O'Rourke
rbowman
2015-01-06 03:26:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
The only warning shots to be fired are directly between the neck and
belt buckle. Period. End program. Full stop.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/attorney-for-family-missoula-police-shot-
suspect-execution-style/article_34c119cf-9cce-5160-abbd-d639812d93a4.html

http://snipurl.com/29l6zvd

Here's another one to chew on though it won't make national news and the
Sharpton Circus won't be coming to town since it was a white cop shooting a
white dude.

My initial take is the cop has his ass in a rather large sling. It's
essentially a domestic gone wrong with the usual outcome of the surviving
partipants ganging up on the cop. Still, shooting the guy through the
driver's window because he thought he was strangling the girlfriend would
play better if the girlfriend's throat was bruised.

David J. Hughes
2014-12-20 23:15:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Aren't ALL crimes things that violate the "compact that allows people to
live together peacefully"? Don't we have a legal system that decides the
punishment? Why isn't death the sentence for all acts of theft then?
Until relatively recently, it was.
Post by Gronk
What are you Taliban? Death for every crime?
For crimes against person and property? Sure.

For crimes against society? Perhaps.

For crimes against God? I always thought we should let Him handle those
Himself.
Gronk
2014-12-25 03:44:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Being a thief violates the compact that allows people to live together
peacefully.
Those that break the compact have earned punishment.
Deaths has been one of the society defined punishments for theft for
thousands of years.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Aren't ALL crimes things that violate the "compact that allows people to
live together peacefully"? Don't we have a legal system that decides the
punishment? Why isn't death the sentence for all acts of theft then?
Until relatively recently, it was.
Really? Examples, please. Especially "recent" ones. From here in America.
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Gronk
What are you Taliban? Death for every crime?
For crimes against person and property? Sure.
So, steal a candy bar, then death?
Post by David J. Hughes
For crimes against society? Perhaps.
So Michael Grimm deserves the death penalty?
Post by David J. Hughes
For crimes against God? I always thought we should let Him handle those
Himself.
Crimes against the supernatural? LOL
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-15 12:36:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
Gronk
2014-12-20 21:24:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?

Aren't ALL crimes things that violate the "compact that allows people to
live together peacefully"? Don't we have a legal system that decides the
punishment? Why isn't death the sentence for all acts of theft then?
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-20 21:45:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
Gronk
2014-12-25 03:36:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-25 11:00:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
If you're talking about yourself...... Drop the straw man and try
again.
Gronk
2014-12-28 20:48:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
If you're talking about yourself...... Drop the straw man and try
again.
Talking about you.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-28 21:20:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
If you're talking about yourself...... Drop the straw man and try
again.
Talking about you.
Poor Gronk, he's giving new meaning to "Dazed and Confused."

[chuckle]
Gronk
2015-01-02 00:35:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
If you're talking about yourself...... Drop the straw man and try
again.
Talking about you.
Poor Gronk, he's giving new meaning to "Dazed and Confused."
[chuckle]
Poor deLoon, he is the poster child for dazed and confused.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-01-02 00:37:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
If you're talking about yourself...... Drop the straw man and try
again.
Talking about you.
Poor Gronk, he's giving new meaning to "Dazed and Confused."
[chuckle]
Poor deLoon, he is the poster child for dazed and confused.
Poor Gronk and his made up "requirements."
Gronk
2015-01-05 01:15:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
If you're talking about yourself...... Drop the straw man and try
again.
Talking about you.
Poor Gronk, he's giving new meaning to "Dazed and Confused."
[chuckle]
Poor deLoon, he is the poster child for dazed and confused.
Poor Gronk and his made up "requirements."
Feel free to blast away on the pretext you felt threatened and let
us know the jury decided - perhaps you can get the cell next to
Kaarma.



http://abcnews.go.com/US/montana-man-markus-kaarma-found-guilty-slaying-german/story?id=27658993

Markus Kaarma has been found guilty in the slaying of 17-year-old German
exchange student Diren Dede, whom he shot after the teen wandered into
Kaarma’s Grant Creek, Montana, garage.

Kaarma had claimed that he killed the teenager inside his garage this
spring out of fear for the safety of his family. Montana law allows a
homeowner to protect himself with deadly force if threatened. Prosecutors
say Kaarma bragged about wanting to "shoot some kids" and left his garage
door open, baiting a would-be robber.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2015-01-05 13:29:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
And there he goes again, talking about some imaginary "requirement"
straw man.
And there he goes again, dodging...
If you're talking about yourself...... Drop the straw man and try
again.
Talking about you.
Poor Gronk, he's giving new meaning to "Dazed and Confused."
[chuckle]
Poor deLoon, he is the poster child for dazed and confused.
Poor Gronk and his made up "requirements."
Feel free to blast away on the pretext you felt threatened
What? And miss the opportunity to see him walk into my bear trap
collection?
Scout
2014-12-20 22:35:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Reasonable threat to the life/limb of innocent people....THAT'S WHY.
Gronk
2014-12-25 03:41:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Gronk
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by unknown
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
At issue now are allegations that Kaarma and Pflager set a trap in
their garage to ensnare would-be burglars after they became irate
about an earlier break-in and the lack of response from law
enforcement.
There are also the four shotgun rounds fired at is alleged to be a kid
leaving the area as rapidly as possible. There was a somewhat similar
incident about 10 years ago when some Rambo shot a kid trying to break into
his car -- in the back. Assholes like that do nothing but screw the people
who may legitimately use the Castle Doctrine.
There is also an interesting omission in most of the coverage. The kid is
described as a German exchange student. While this is legally true, don't
picture some blue eyed, blond haired specimen -- the kid was a Turkish
Moslem. The local paper gave it away when it mentioned the authorities
somehow had dredged up a local imam to do whatever you do with dead Moslems.
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
What made a difference is he wouldn't have been killed if he hadn't
been committing a criminal act.
You left that part out, for some reason.
And this required being shot, why?
Poor Gronk. He's a stranger to the English language, and it confuses
him.
I repeat: this required being shot, why?
Reasonable threat to the life/limb of innocent people....THAT'S WHY.
WHAT reasonable threat? He couldn't fire a warning shot?

What you're sying is that anybody can blast away for any reason if
they feel threatened...
Lamont Schlong
2014-12-14 22:13:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
You say that like it almost might have made a difference.
He made the Turk a good Muslim.
Wayne
2014-12-12 22:25:57 UTC
Permalink
"deep" wrote in message news:***@4ax.com...

http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
Post by unknown
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some beer.
So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open and waited
with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the dark. The last
(and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he was running from the
garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming Castle Doctrine and just
how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the past,
at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to own guns.
This is more evidence why we need background checks.
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.

And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
bigdog
2014-12-13 16:28:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
Post by unknown
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some beer.
So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open and waited
with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the dark. The last
(and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he was running from the
garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming Castle Doctrine and just
how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the past,
at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to own guns.
This is more evidence why we need background checks.
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
In my state of Ohio, castle doctrine does not apply to a detached garage. We have yet to have a test case as to whether it applies to an attached garage. The advice of the attorney who spoke at our CCW training class was to not become that test case. Wait until they enter the house before you blow them away.
benj
2014-12-13 18:19:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by unknown
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
Post by unknown
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some beer.
So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open and waited
with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the dark. The last
(and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he was running from the
garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming Castle Doctrine and just
how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the past,
at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to own guns.
This is more evidence why we need background checks.
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
In my state of Ohio, castle doctrine does not apply to a detached garage. We have yet to have a test case as to whether it applies to an attached garage. The advice of the attorney who spoke at our CCW training class was to not become that test case. Wait until they enter the house before you blow them away.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
benj
2014-12-13 18:47:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
Post by unknown
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
Post by bigdog
Post by unknown
Post by unknown
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some
beer. So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open
and waited with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the
dark. The last (and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he
was running from the garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming
Castle Doctrine and just how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the
past, at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to
own guns. This is more evidence why we need background checks.
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
In my state of Ohio, castle doctrine does not apply to a detached
garage. We have yet to have a test case as to whether it applies to
an attached garage. The advice of the attorney who spoke at our CCW
training class was to not become that test case. Wait until they
enter the house before you blow them away.
A good idea. When someone breaks into your house, the law gives you the
automatic assumption that the person is both armed and willing to kill
you. Unlike the liberal idea that you must say "excuse me Mr. Burglar,
but are you an 'armed black teen' or an 'unarmed black teen'?", the law
says they ARE armed and a threat to your life and those of your family.
You get to shoot first and check for them being "unarmed" later.

On your property or in a detached garage, it is different. There it is a
matter of whether you could feel there was a credible threat to your
life. In that case a prowler with a gun is obviously a threat, but an
"unarmed black teen" may only be a trespasser. Unless he punches you in
the face and tries to take your gun or pounds your head into the
pavement shooting him is not justified.

And by the way, even if the perp breaks into your house you MAY NOT
empty your gun into him or even worse say something like "Take that you
lousy punk" and shoot him in the head once he is down. Law says you are
only permitted to "stop" the danger or attack. Once the attack or danger
has passed because perp is down etc., additional shots are MURDER! Got
it? However, if the perp dies while being "stopped" that is irrelevant.

Remember when the burglar (stupid one) broke into the police chief's
house in your town? The chief saw him coming in a window. As the guy
was part way in the chief shot him and continued to shoot until he was
stopped. The guy fell back outside and died. This was "by the book". He
did not shoot the guy outside (even though he fell back out there) he
did not empty his gun into him, but only kept shooting until he was
"stopped". He did not have to say "excuse me, stupid, but are you armed
and dangerous?". And the grand jury didn't indict. But then chief was
black and so was burglar so racist leftist media paid no attention.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
bigdog
2014-12-20 22:34:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by bigdog
Post by unknown
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
Post by bigdog
Post by unknown
Post by unknown
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some
beer. So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open
and waited with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the
dark. The last (and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he
was running from the garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming
Castle Doctrine and just how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the
past, at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to
own guns. This is more evidence why we need background checks.
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
In my state of Ohio, castle doctrine does not apply to a detached
garage. We have yet to have a test case as to whether it applies to
an attached garage. The advice of the attorney who spoke at our CCW
training class was to not become that test case. Wait until they
enter the house before you blow them away.
A good idea. When someone breaks into your house, the law gives you the
automatic assumption that the person is both armed and willing to kill
you. Unlike the liberal idea that you must say "excuse me Mr. Burglar,
but are you an 'armed black teen' or an 'unarmed black teen'?", the law
says they ARE armed and a threat to your life and those of your family.
You get to shoot first and check for them being "unarmed" later.
That's much easier to do after they have assumed room temperature.
Post by unknown
On your property or in a detached garage, it is different. There it is a
matter of whether you could feel there was a credible threat to your
life. In that case a prowler with a gun is obviously a threat, but an
"unarmed black teen" may only be a trespasser. Unless he punches you in
the face and tries to take your gun or pounds your head into the
pavement shooting him is not justified.
And by the way, even if the perp breaks into your house you MAY NOT
empty your gun into him or even worse say something like "Take that you
lousy punk" and shoot him in the head once he is down. Law says you are
only permitted to "stop" the danger or attack. Once the attack or danger
has passed because perp is down etc., additional shots are MURDER! Got
it? However, if the perp dies while being "stopped" that is irrelevant.
Of course if he bleeds to death while I am trying to "find" my cell phone to call the paramedics, that's his tough luck. That wouldn't be much of a stretch since I am always misplacing my cell phone anyway. Right now I'm trying to locate my wallet. I had to replace my driver's license yesterday. I'll probably find it after I get all the credit cards reissued. My big concern is having to replace my CCW license. I don't know if I have to buy a new one or can just pay a fee to reissue the old one.
Post by unknown
Remember when the burglar (stupid one) broke into the police chief's
house in your town? The chief saw him coming in a window. As the guy
was part way in the chief shot him and continued to shoot until he was
stopped. The guy fell back outside and died. This was "by the book". He
did not shoot the guy outside (even though he fell back out there) he
did not empty his gun into him, but only kept shooting until he was
"stopped". He did not have to say "excuse me, stupid, but are you armed
and dangerous?". And the grand jury didn't indict. But then chief was
black and so was burglar so racist leftist media paid no attention.
If you are talking about former Police Chief James Jackson, I do remember that. My recollection is that the chief only wounded him. I remember the jokes around the water cooler were that the chief needed to spend more time on the range. Other than the issue of whether the perp died or not, everything else you described sounds like the incident I am thinking of.
Post by unknown
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-14 22:29:36 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:28:55 -0800 (PST), bigdog
Post by bigdog
Post by unknown
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
Post by unknown
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some beer.
So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open and waited
with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the dark. The last
(and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he was running from the
garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming Castle Doctrine and just
how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the past,
at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to own guns.
This is more evidence why we need background checks.
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
In my state of Ohio, castle doctrine does not apply to a detached garage.
It's irrelevant since the concept of castle doctrine is not being
challenged here.

All normal people know that Castle Doctrine is a good thing.

If Dudu sees a car full of girl scouts pull up to the gate outside his
trailer, and he runs outside and shoots them all to death-- which is a
very real possibility-- just because he then starts shrieking "Castle
Doctrine!!!!" doesn't mean (a) he even knows what it is or (b) "Castle
Doctrine is under fire."

Especially in Montana.

One leftist state senator is whining about it, because liberals hate
the idea of someone defending themselves.

I bet break ins in Montana just dropped to zero.

Here is a photo of the sneaky little kraut inside the garage,
obviously prepared to commit a crime.
Loading Image...

Obviously the infestation of liberals in Montana has gotten out of
hand:

A friend of the German exchange student who was killed in a Montana
garage said that breaking into garages was a common pastime for teens
in Missoula, but no one thought it could be fatal.

Robby Pazmino, who was with Diren Dede the night he died, testified on
Tuesday. It was the sixth day in the trial of Markus Kaarma, who is
accused of deliberate homicide in the 27 April shooting.
unknown
2014-12-14 17:26:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
He had a history of violent criminal behavior. He is the very kind
of person that background checks are supposed to turn up.
Post by Wayne
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
Agreed, but that is his defense.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-14 17:31:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
He had a history of violent criminal behavior. He is the very kind
of person that background checks are supposed to turn up.
Why haven't you been flagged then?
Alissia Benveniste
2014-12-14 22:07:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
He had a history of violent criminal behavior. He is the very kind
of person that background checks are supposed to turn up.
Why haven't you been flagged then?


#####

Same reason he never turned in his neighbor.
rbowman
2014-12-14 18:55:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
Agreed, but that is his defense.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/markus-kaarma-trial-castle-doctrine-under-
fire-after-missoula-shooting/article_bfdb6fe3-4eab-5fa2-863d-
d39907303427.html

http://snipurl.com/29iv5ek

Kaarma's actions may have implications for the Montana castle doctrine
although I doubt Hill will be able to get any traction in a Republican
dominated state legislature. The takeaway from the article for people like
CanopyCo comes from Gary Marbut. He is the head of the Montana Shooting
Sports Association, has promoted several laws liberalizing firearm law in
the state including the Montana Firearms Freedom Act copied by several other
states, is a CCW instructor, and a USPSA competitor, among other things:

"Up until recently, Marbut couldn’t discuss the Kaarma case because he’s
often called as an expert witness in state and federal court on Montana’s
use of force laws.

Now free to talk, Marbut says he wouldn’t have worked for Kaarma’s defense.
Based upon what he knows about the case, he doesn’t believe Kaarma was
justified in using lethal force against Dede, at least under the conditions
in which he carried it out.

“I think he made a classical error, a serious error, because he couldn’t
visualize the target,” Marbut said. “The lights were off (in the garage),
and so he couldn’t see or know if he was under serious threat. A gun owner
is responsible when he pulls the trigger for where his bullets land.”

In his self-defense classes, Marbut reminds students that if they use lethal
force, they’ll have to justify their actions in court and prove they met
three main criteria – opportunity, ability and intent.

If the criteria are met, he said, one has to determine if the threat is
imminent. If it is, he added, they must then decide if their response is
proportional to the threat.

He doesn’t believe Kaarma could have met those criteria when he never saw
Dede before firing into the dark garage.

“I won’t work for somebody who I don’t think is on the right side of the
law,” Marbut said. “My opinion of that incident would be my opinion and the
defense wouldn’t want to pay me for that opinion because he (Kaarma)
couldn’t visualize his target.”


Montana doesn't have a statute defining felonious assholery, so we'll see
what the jury comes up with.
Scout
2014-12-14 19:02:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
He had a history of violent criminal behavior. He is the very kind
of person that background checks are supposed to turn up.
So are you......but somehow you don't want to give up your guns.
Post by unknown
Post by Wayne
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
Agreed, but that is his defense.
Seems you would claim it as your defense as you murder your neighbors.
Wayne
2014-12-14 19:36:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wayne
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
# He had a history of violent criminal behavior. He is the very kind
# of person that background checks are supposed to turn up.

I'd prefer to err on the side of freedom, given that there are a lot of
strange people in the world.
If he had a history of violent criminal behavior, wouldn't that have gotten
his guns already?
Post by Wayne
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
# Agreed, but that is his defense.

Then he's in deep shit. And when he's convicted, the gun grabbers will
still demand repeal of castle doctrine.
Lamont Schlong
2014-12-14 22:16:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
Agreed, but that is his defense.
He was in his house? Pretty good defense.
rbowman
2014-12-15 00:17:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lamont Schlong
Post by unknown
Agreed, but that is his defense.
He was in his house? Pretty good defense.
Unlighted garage and he fired before identifying a target. In other words he
was blasting away with a shotgun in the dark. I fully defend the right to
keep and bear arms and to defend yourself against clearly identified
threats. I do not defend assholes who give the Bloomberg crowd ammunition so
to speak.
Dustin
2014-12-15 18:21:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lamont Schlong
Post by unknown
Agreed, but that is his defense.
He was in his house? Pretty good defense.
Nope. Doesn't meet criteria. He fired into the dark. Didn't even know
what/who he was shooting at. Couldn't have possibly determined threat at
that point; he couldn't see the fucking target.

I can't put a pile of cash in my living room floor, with the windows and
doors open, inviting a bad guy in to take it, while I sit outside of his
view with a shotgun, waiting to blast him when he enters to take my
money. Especially not cool in the dark. I'm responsible the moment I
pull the trigger for where that round goes.

Isn't gun shooting 101, know your backdrop? know where the bullet might
go if you miss the target? This isn't a responsible gun owner in that
news article. Firing a shotgun! into the dark of all weapons.
--
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!
David J. Hughes
2014-12-15 20:08:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dustin
Post by Lamont Schlong
Post by unknown
Agreed, but that is his defense.
He was in his house? Pretty good defense.
Nope. Doesn't meet criteria. He fired into the dark. Didn't even know
what/who he was shooting at. Couldn't have possibly determined threat at
that point; he couldn't see the fucking target.
I can't put a pile of cash in my living room floor, with the windows and
doors open, inviting a bad guy in to take it, while I sit outside of his
view with a shotgun, waiting to blast him when he enters to take my
money. Especially not cool in the dark. I'm responsible the moment I
pull the trigger for where that round goes.
Isn't gun shooting 101, know your backdrop? know where the bullet might
go if you miss the target? This isn't a responsible gun owner in that
news article. Firing a shotgun! into the dark of all weapons.
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it may
well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a minimal
chance of exiting the garage.
Anyone inside the garage, at night, without the owner's permission, is a
viable target.
Dustin
2014-12-15 20:39:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my experience
with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior garage room
walls; you're bound to land a round in the living room, somebodies
bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not exactly even bullet
resistant material you're talking about here.
Post by David J. Hughes
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it
may well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a
minimal chance of exiting the garage.
I suspect the garage has some wood, some insulation, alot of spacing,
and sheetrock and some paint, some 12/2 with ground wiring too; likely
in the walls, halfway up the side. They won't do much for stopping
rounds either.

Nothing that would even stop most small calibre pistol rounds, let
alone the majority of shotgun shells.

Even buckshot at close range is going to knock a hole thru the wall.
Into the other room, if one exists. If someone is near that hole when
it's made, their probably going to require a hospital visit.
Post by David J. Hughes
Anyone inside the garage, at night, without the owner's permission,
is a viable target.
Nope. You're supposed to know what you're shooting at. Firing into the
dark at something you can't see, is a stupid move. We aren't talking
about returning fire to muzzle flash or anything like that.

And I guess we'll see how it turns out when the trial is over anyhow.
--
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!
David J. Hughes
2014-12-15 22:12:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my experience
with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior garage room
walls; you're bound to land a round in the living room, somebodies
bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not exactly even bullet
resistant material you're talking about here.
Post by David J. Hughes
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it
may well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a
minimal chance of exiting the garage.
I suspect the garage has some wood, some insulation, alot of spacing,
and sheetrock and some paint, some 12/2 with ground wiring too; likely
in the walls, halfway up the side. They won't do much for stopping
rounds either.
1/2" exterior grade plywood, and tar paper, as a minimum.

Sheetrock, 1/2" plywood, and some form of sheathing (Cement board, 3/4"
siding, a course of brick,...)

The first will slow down up to O Buck enough that it is non lethal, stop
4 Buck and smaller if fired from more than 10".
The second will slow down if not stop anything smaller than a slug.
Post by Dustin
Nothing that would even stop most small calibre pistol rounds, let
alone the majority of shotgun shells.
Even buckshot at close range is going to knock a hole thru the wall.
Into the other room, if one exists. If someone is near that hole when
it's made, their probably going to require a hospital visit.
Round shot has pitiful penetration, and shot pellets, individually, have
very little ballistic energy.
A OO Buck pellet has about the same energy as a .25 ACP bullet, a
notoriously underpowered cartridge.
OOO Buck is about the same as a .36 Navy Cap and Ball round with a half
powder load. Useful in the close confines of a ship, and it won't
penetrate a bulkhead.
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
Anyone inside the garage, at night, without the owner's permission,
is a viable target.
Nope. You're supposed to know what you're shooting at. Firing into the
dark at something you can't see, is a stupid move.
It's a standard modern military tactic. Something trips a perimeter
alarm, hose down the area.
In the dark, you can't be certain if they are armed, so you have to act
as if they are. Any other action can get you killed if they are armed.

We aren't talking
Post by Dustin
about returning fire to muzzle flash or anything like that.
And I guess we'll see how it turns out when the trial is over anyhow.
Dustin
2014-12-16 02:22:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my
experience with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior
garage room walls; you're bound to land a round in the living
room, somebodies bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not
exactly even bullet resistant material you're talking about here.
Post by David J. Hughes
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used,
it may well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a
minimal chance of exiting the garage.
I suspect the garage has some wood, some insulation, alot of
spacing, and sheetrock and some paint, some 12/2 with ground
wiring too; likely in the walls, halfway up the side. They won't
do much for stopping rounds either.
1/2" exterior grade plywood, and tar paper, as a minimum.
Of course. :) It's not sheetrock on the side exposed to the weather,
obviously. But, none of the materials listed are designed to stop
rounds from entering/leaving the building either. And if it's an
interior wall without an outside wall behind it, it's going to be
sheetrock and insulation with a wire (possibly for outlets) between
studs. In between those studs in that building configuration, it's two
sheets of sheetrock (one on each side) that stands between the bullet
and the other room. Ie: nothing.
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Dustin
Even buckshot at close range is going to knock a hole thru the
wall. Into the other room, if one exists. If someone is near that
hole when it's made, their probably going to require a hospital
visit.
Round shot has pitiful penetration, and shot pellets, individually,
have very little ballistic energy.
Doesn't take much if you're traveling thru sheetrock and into a human.
Post by David J. Hughes
A OO Buck pellet has about the same energy as a .25 ACP bullet, a
notoriously underpowered cartridge.
Underpowered, yet still potentially lethal, depending on where you get
hit and how fast you can acquire medical attention. It's like the
22LR; a seriously under rated cartridge. Lethal as hell as a result.
Hit you in the leg, exit thru your ribcage, kinda deal.
Post by David J. Hughes
OOO Buck is about the same as a .36 Navy Cap and Ball round with a
half powder load. Useful in the close confines of a ship, and it
won't penetrate a bulkhead.
A bulkhead is a bit more solid than your house's interior walls. [g]
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by Dustin
Nope. You're supposed to know what you're shooting at. Firing into
the dark at something you can't see, is a stupid move.
It's a standard modern military tactic. Something trips a
perimeter alarm, hose down the area.
Military sure, under known combat situations. You already know the
enemy is around. You took the effort to setup a perimeter with a
killzone. That does sound like what these people did too; and if
that's the case, they murdered that kid and can't claim castle laws
apply here.

Military is a little different than civilian in a non combat zone.
Post by David J. Hughes
In the dark, you can't be certain if they are armed, so you have
to act as if they are. Any other action can get you killed if they
are armed.
Firing blindly into the dark can get others who have nothing to do
with the issue at hand killed or seriously injured as well. We're
comparing two different things here, though. This guy wasn't behind
enemy lines. Without seeing the target in this situation, he couldn't
have determined yes/no threat. He just opened fire. That could have
been his girlfriend/wife/whatevers aunt, mom, etc. He didn't know what
he was shooting at!

He's girlfriend/wife/whatever is backpeddling as fast as she can so
far.. I don't think the jury is going to go for the self defense line.

Hell, he discussed carrying out this plan in public and others
overheard him. He should have kept his mouth shut. he makes all gun
owners in the states look like a bunch of dumbass hicks that shoot at
anything that moves or makes a sound in the night. I'm a proud gun
owner myself, and this idiots actions aren't helping my rights to
continue owning them. He's giving the anti gun nuts ammo.

He should have been evaluated when he met the bug sprayer with a
shotgun. No need to be pointing a gun in someones face unless their an
immediate threat or you think they might be. What if it accidently
fired? He would have taken somebody elses head off. I suppose that
would be blamed on gun manufacturer though, and not the moron pointing
it?

It's not like you need precise accuracy with a 12guage. You don't need
to already have it pointed at somebody when you walk up on them. They
do anything stupid, raising it to midsection and firing (which is
likely where it's pointing while being carried anyhow) is going to do
the deed for you. Unless you've got it strapped over your shoulder,
it's already pretty much on the target, no real need to point it in
the persons face.

Also, it's very stupid to have a long gun that close to what you think
is a bad guy; they could take the damn thing from you and shoot you
with your own gun. Which probably wouldn't have been a bad thing for
this guy.
--
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!
rbowman
2014-12-16 02:40:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
It's a standard modern military tactic. Something trips a perimeter
alarm, hose down the area.
In the dark, you can't be certain if they are armed, so you have to act
as if they are. Any other action can get you killed if they are armed.
We're a little wild in Montana but this ain't Iraq. You want to play be the
military ROEs for a warzone, the Army is looking for a lot of mediocre men.
David J. Hughes
2014-12-16 04:16:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by David J. Hughes
It's a standard modern military tactic. Something trips a perimeter
alarm, hose down the area.
In the dark, you can't be certain if they are armed, so you have to act
as if they are. Any other action can get you killed if they are armed.
We're a little wild in Montana but this ain't Iraq. You want to play be the
military ROEs for a warzone, the Army is looking for a lot of mediocre men.
Served my time, got my DD214 in the early 70's.
rbowman
2014-12-16 04:47:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
Served my time, got my DD214 in the early 70's.
Yeah, U've for one of those too. And?
David J. Hughes
2014-12-16 05:27:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by David J. Hughes
Served my time, got my DD214 in the early 70's.
Yeah, U've for one of those too. And?
Means I'm a bit long in the tooth to be accepted for service today as
was suggested.

Yeah, I can still hump a 100+ lbs. of gear and keep up with the
youngsters, but I can't do it for weeks at a stretch.
My beat up old carcass just can't handle that amount of stress.
rbowman
2014-12-16 06:14:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
Means I'm a bit long in the tooth to be accepted for service today as
was suggested.
That was a generalized 'you'. The point was Kaarma is not in the military,
and the last time I looked Grant Creek wasn't a war zone. It's not even
Detroit.

http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-Missoula-Montana.html

This was a bumper crop year for murders.

http://missoulian.com/news/local/bail-set-for-in-missoula-murder-case-
victim-was-stomped/article_90a4e406-1f67-11e4-8532-0019bb2963f4.html

In the years there is a murder, it's typically transients killing each other
over the last bottle of Mad Dog. It's telling that when Kaarma called the
cops about a previous theft they advised him to close and lock his doors but
he didn't feel he should have to.

http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/medical-examiner-
german-student-s-death-homicide/article_1434f717-83b8-5384-
a3e1-423e446212c1.html

"Jurors saw video of multiple shotgun pellet holes in the home, including
one that hit a bottle of cooking oil in the kitchen pantry. Kaarma's baby
was inside the home at the time."

Apparently the house came off second best too, making the discussion about
the penetrating power of shotgun pellets more pertinent.

The jurors will decide.
Dustin
2014-12-16 14:16:04 UTC
Permalink
rbowman <***@montana.com> news:***@mid.individual.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:14:48 GMT in alt.survival, wrote the following
Post by rbowman
Post by David J. Hughes
Means I'm a bit long in the tooth to be accepted for service today
as was suggested.
That was a generalized 'you'. The point was Kaarma is not in the
military, and the last time I looked Grant Creek wasn't a war zone.
It's not even Detroit.
http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-Missoula-Montana.html
This was a bumper crop year for murders.
http://missoulian.com/news/local/bail-set-for-in-missoula-murder-cas
e-
victim-was-stomped/article_90a4e406-1f67-11e4-8532-0019bb2963f4.html
In the years there is a murder, it's typically transients killing
each other over the last bottle of Mad Dog. It's telling that when
Kaarma called the cops about a previous theft they advised him to
close and lock his doors but he didn't feel he should have to.
http://missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/medical-examin
er- german-student-s-death-homicide/article_1434f717-83b8-5384-
a3e1-423e446212c1.html
"Jurors saw video of multiple shotgun pellet holes in the home,
including one that hit a bottle of cooking oil in the kitchen
pantry. Kaarma's baby was inside the home at the time."
What did I just recently write about a backdrop? Ayep.
Post by rbowman
Apparently the house came off second best too, making the
discussion about the penetrating power of shotgun pellets more
pertinent.
Isn't it though. If you don't know what you're shooting at, don't
shoot. If you don't know what's behind your intended target, don't
shoot; Unless person poses immediate life threatening/serious property
damage threat, and, you have no other option. Bear in mind though,
you're still responsible for where that round goes and whatever it
drills along the way to it's final stop. There might be a few
exceptions to this rule, but generally speaking, if you try to use
lethal force on a 'bad guy' and blow a hole thru somebodies tractor
across the street, you might be paying for the repairs.

Oh, and what's more, don't shoot towards interior walls of your house,
garage or not. Most likely, as was with this case (I don't know of any
real exceptions, actually; but i'll stick with most) that round is
going thru your wall and into something else.

Good thing the pellet just murdered the cooking oil and didn't drill
the kid, or anyone else.
Post by rbowman
The jurors will decide.
Yep. It's looking worse and worse for him, imho.
--
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!
rbowman
2014-12-16 14:38:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dustin
Yep. It's looking worse and worse for him, imho.
The closing remarks are today and the jurors probably want to get their
Christmas shopping done so we should have a decision soon.
benj
2014-12-15 22:48:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my experience
with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior garage room
walls; you're bound to land a round in the living room, somebodies
bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not exactly even bullet
resistant material you're talking about here.
Post by David J. Hughes
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it
may well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a
minimal chance of exiting the garage.
I suspect the garage has some wood, some insulation, alot of spacing,
and sheetrock and some paint, some 12/2 with ground wiring too; likely
in the walls, halfway up the side. They won't do much for stopping
rounds either.
Nothing that would even stop most small calibre pistol rounds, let
alone the majority of shotgun shells.
Even buckshot at close range is going to knock a hole thru the wall.
Into the other room, if one exists. If someone is near that hole when
it's made, their probably going to require a hospital visit.
Post by David J. Hughes
Anyone inside the garage, at night, without the owner's permission,
is a viable target.
Nope. You're supposed to know what you're shooting at. Firing into the
dark at something you can't see, is a stupid move. We aren't talking
about returning fire to muzzle flash or anything like that.
And I guess we'll see how it turns out when the trial is over anyhow.
Exactly. Our pro-gun group made a display door. It was a SOLID wood (not
cored like a closet door) front door. We fired virtually all calibers at
it from handguns etc. PLEASE NOTE: ALL CALIBERS (including so-called
"mouse" handguns) went clean through that door! The hole made by a
shotgun was particularly impressive!

Unfinished garages are often simply wood siding nailed to vertical 2x4s
and finished ones (and frame houses) are the same but with a layer of
drywall on the inside. None of these come up to an inch thick solid door.

This is one reason that the militarization of local police having them
carry assault rifles in urban residential situations is particularly
worrisome. A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3 ft diameter tree
trunk and kill the guy on the other side. Just how many residential
houses do you think a police .223 "assault rifle" will penetrate and clean?

Is this a policing or eugenics policy?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\_:/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
\/__/ \/__/
Just Wondering
2014-12-16 00:47:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my experience
with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior garage room
walls; you're bound to land a round in the living room, somebodies
bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not exactly even bullet
resistant material you're talking about here.
Post by David J. Hughes
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it
may well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a
minimal chance of exiting the garage.
I suspect the garage has some wood, some insulation, alot of spacing,
and sheetrock and some paint, some 12/2 with ground wiring too; likely
in the walls, halfway up the side. They won't do much for stopping
rounds either.
Nothing that would even stop most small calibre pistol rounds, let
alone the majority of shotgun shells.
Even buckshot at close range is going to knock a hole thru the wall.
Into the other room, if one exists. If someone is near that hole when
it's made, their probably going to require a hospital visit.
Post by David J. Hughes
Anyone inside the garage, at night, without the owner's permission,
is a viable target.
Nope. You're supposed to know what you're shooting at. Firing into the
dark at something you can't see, is a stupid move. We aren't talking
about returning fire to muzzle flash or anything like that.
And I guess we'll see how it turns out when the trial is over anyhow.
Exactly. Our pro-gun group made a display door. It was a SOLID wood (not
cored like a closet door) front door. We fired virtually all calibers at
it from handguns etc. PLEASE NOTE: ALL CALIBERS (including so-called
"mouse" handguns) went clean through that door! The hole made by a
shotgun was particularly impressive!
Unfinished garages are often simply wood siding nailed to vertical 2x4s
and finished ones (and frame houses) are the same but with a layer of
drywall on the inside. None of these come up to an inch thick solid door.
This is one reason that the militarization of local police having them
carry assault rifles in urban residential situations is particularly
worrisome. A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3 ft diameter tree
trunk and kill the guy on the other side.
Maybe, I couldn't say. It would depend on the type of tree. I'd
believe 2 feet, anyway. Those movie sequences where the hero hides
behind an interior wall, or household furniture and appliances, or a car
door, are silly.

An AR-15, which is what most hoplophobes have in mind when they cry
"assault rifle". fires .223 bullets which don't have the penetration of
a .308. That makes those nasty so-called "assault rifles" a safer
choice than most hunting rifles which don't seem to concern the hoplophobes.
RD Sandman
2014-12-18 18:19:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Just Wondering
Post by benj
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my
experience with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior
garage room walls; you're bound to land a round in the living room,
somebodies bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not exactly
even bullet resistant material you're talking about here.
Post by David J. Hughes
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it
may well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a
minimal chance of exiting the garage.
I suspect the garage has some wood, some insulation, alot of
spacing, and sheetrock and some paint, some 12/2 with ground wiring
too; likely in the walls, halfway up the side. They won't do much
for stopping rounds either.
Nothing that would even stop most small calibre pistol rounds, let
alone the majority of shotgun shells.
Even buckshot at close range is going to knock a hole thru the wall.
Into the other room, if one exists. If someone is near that hole
when it's made, their probably going to require a hospital visit.
Post by David J. Hughes
Anyone inside the garage, at night, without the owner's permission,
is a viable target.
Nope. You're supposed to know what you're shooting at. Firing into
the dark at something you can't see, is a stupid move. We aren't
talking about returning fire to muzzle flash or anything like that.
And I guess we'll see how it turns out when the trial is over anyhow.
Exactly. Our pro-gun group made a display door. It was a SOLID wood
(not cored like a closet door) front door. We fired virtually all
calibers at it from handguns etc. PLEASE NOTE: ALL CALIBERS
(including so-called "mouse" handguns) went clean through that door!
The hole made by a shotgun was particularly impressive!
Unfinished garages are often simply wood siding nailed to vertical
2x4s and finished ones (and frame houses) are the same but with a
layer of drywall on the inside. None of these come up to an inch
thick solid door.
This is one reason that the militarization of local police having
them carry assault rifles in urban residential situations is
particularly worrisome. A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3 ft
diameter tree trunk and kill the guy on the other side.
Maybe, I couldn't say. It would depend on the type of tree. I'd
believe 2 feet, anyway. Those movie sequences where the hero hides
behind an interior wall, or household furniture and appliances, or a
car door, are silly.
An AR-15, which is what most hoplophobes have in mind when they cry
"assault rifle". fires .223 bullets which don't have the penetration
of a .308. That makes those nasty so-called "assault rifles" a safer
choice than most hunting rifles which don't seem to concern the hoplophobes.
I don't believe a .308 will pentrate a 3' thick tree and still have the
power to kill on the other side and a .223 is, at best, a medium power
cartridge.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-16 01:02:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3 ft diameter tree
trunk and kill the guy on the other side.
I kinda doubt it.
rbowman
2014-12-16 02:36:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by benj
A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3 ft diameter tree
trunk and kill the guy on the other side.
I kinda doubt it.
Hollow tree. It really pissed off the raccoon tha was living in it...
RD Sandman
2014-12-18 18:20:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by benj
A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3 ft diameter tree
trunk and kill the guy on the other side.
I kinda doubt it.
Hollow tree. It really pissed off the raccoon tha was living in it...
Good thing it missed him or it would have lost penetration.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Dustin
2014-12-16 02:32:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by benj
Exactly. Our pro-gun group made a display door. It was a SOLID wood
(not cored like a closet door) front door. We fired virtually all
calibers at it from handguns etc. PLEASE NOTE: ALL CALIBERS
(including so-called "mouse" handguns) went clean through that
door! The hole made by a shotgun was particularly impressive!
Ayep. We learned gun safety with watermelons when I was a kiddo. This
is what your gun does; you can't put the watermelon back together.
KNOW what your shooting at, and know what you might hit if you miss!
You can't take it back once you pull the trigger.
Post by benj
This is one reason that the militarization of local police having
them carry assault rifles in urban residential situations is
particularly worrisome. A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3
ft diameter tree trunk and kill the guy on the other side. Just how
many residential houses do you think a police .223 "assault rifle"
will penetrate and clean?
Most of the ones they shoot with it. With the nightvision, infra-red,
and heat detection optics they have now, you're target practice from a
safe distance with one of those. Even if your sitting on your toilet.
Post by benj
Is this a policing or eugenics policy?
I guess that depends on who you ask. heh.
--
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!
RD Sandman
2014-12-18 18:23:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dustin
Post by benj
Exactly. Our pro-gun group made a display door. It was a SOLID wood
(not cored like a closet door) front door. We fired virtually all
calibers at it from handguns etc. PLEASE NOTE: ALL CALIBERS
(including so-called "mouse" handguns) went clean through that
door! The hole made by a shotgun was particularly impressive!
Ayep. We learned gun safety with watermelons when I was a kiddo. This
is what your gun does; you can't put the watermelon back together.
KNOW what your shooting at, and know what you might hit if you miss!
You can't take it back once you pull the trigger.
Now, that's the truth.
Post by Dustin
Post by benj
This is one reason that the militarization of local police having
them carry assault rifles in urban residential situations is
particularly worrisome. A .308 rifle bullet will pass through a 3
ft diameter tree trunk and kill the guy on the other side. Just how
many residential houses do you think a police .223 "assault rifle"
will penetrate and clean?
Most of the ones they shoot with it. With the nightvision, infra-red,
and heat detection optics they have now, you're target practice from a
safe distance with one of those. Even if your sitting on your toilet.
A .223 assault rifle? Gimme a break. The guy would have to be shooting
through a window. Now, ball ammo will act differently than standard
hunting rounds.
Post by Dustin
Post by benj
Is this a policing or eugenics policy?
I guess that depends on who you ask. heh.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Scout
2014-12-16 06:19:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my experience
with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior garage room
walls; you're bound to land a round in the living room, somebodies
bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not exactly even bullet
resistant material you're talking about here.
The interior may be sheetrock, the outside may be anything from foam
insulation under vinyl siding, to plywood sheathing under wooden or even
concrete composite siding.

An air pellet may well fully penetrate the low end, but the upper end would
probably block moderate handgun rounds and even some rifle rounds. All
depends on the construction of the particular garage. For example, I have a
neighbor who sided his detached garage with 1-1/8" thick rough cut oak
boards. This is on top of the T1-11 siding that was already installed which
is effectively either 5/8 or 3/4 inch thick plywood. The interior walls are
covered in dry wall, over foam insulation, with peg board liberally
installed over that. Not all garages were built to the minimal building
standards you often see today in these 'instant' subdivisions that have
sprung up in the last 10-20 years.
Dustin
2014-12-16 14:21:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Post by Dustin
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Not a good backdrop. Dunno what houses you've built, but my
experience with them, you don't want to be shooting at interior
garage room walls; you're bound to land a round in the living
room, somebodies bedroom, a bathroom.. etc. It's sheetrock. Not
exactly even bullet resistant material you're talking about here.
The interior may be sheetrock, the outside may be anything from
foam insulation under vinyl siding, to plywood sheathing under
wooden or even concrete composite siding.
An air pellet may well fully penetrate the low end, but the upper
end would probably block moderate handgun rounds and even some
rifle rounds.
Perhaps. I wouldn't want to actually test the theory nor find my self
in a position that required me relying on it to actually do that. I'm
not dismissing the idea, just that I wouldn't want to try it myself.
Post by Scout
building standards you often see today in these 'instant'
subdivisions that have sprung up in the last 10-20 years.
I didn't mean to imply all houses were the same. Where I'm presently
located, you'd need a rather high calibre rifle round to even think
about knocking a hole in anything. This house was built during the
bomb scare days. It's designed to take one hell of a hit. Paranoid
designer/builder.

Which also means making changes to the interior, such as new wiring,
etc, is a royal pain in the ass. You don't even want to bother with
the cordless tools; you'll be running the batteries down faster than
the charger can get one back online. Been there, done that.
--
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!
rbowman
2014-12-16 02:33:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it may
well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a minimal
chance of exiting the garage.
I believe his car was in the garage too and came out a little worse for the
wear.
David J. Hughes
2014-12-16 04:13:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by rbowman
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it may
well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a minimal
chance of exiting the garage.
I believe his car was in the garage too and came out a little worse for the
wear.
Years ago I bought a 78 Ford F-250 that had been vandalized by some git
with a 12 gauge.
000 Buck into the passenger door. From the pattern, the shooter was
about 35 to 40 feet away.
6 pellets penetrated the outer steel of the door, one went through the
window glass on both passenger and driver sides.
4 were recovered inside the passenger door, having been stopped by
either the inner steel or window mechanism.
2 penetrated the fiberboard and plastic door panel, one that went
through the arm rest bounced off the steering column, leaving a small
dent, the other left a 3/8" deep dent in the inner steel of the driver's
door, about 2" below the window. Both recovered inside the cab.

Replaced both windows and the window mechanism on the passenger side,
and drove the truck for about 150 K miles.

After 2 weeks, filled in the holes on the passenger side door, as the
whistling at highway speeds was annoying.
Gunner Asch
2014-12-16 04:27:06 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:13:29 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by rbowman
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it may
well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a minimal
chance of exiting the garage.
I believe his car was in the garage too and came out a little worse for the
wear.
Years ago I bought a 78 Ford F-250 that had been vandalized by some git
with a 12 gauge.
000 Buck into the passenger door. From the pattern, the shooter was
about 35 to 40 feet away.
6 pellets penetrated the outer steel of the door, one went through the
window glass on both passenger and driver sides.
4 were recovered inside the passenger door, having been stopped by
either the inner steel or window mechanism.
2 penetrated the fiberboard and plastic door panel, one that went
through the arm rest bounced off the steering column, leaving a small
dent, the other left a 3/8" deep dent in the inner steel of the driver's
door, about 2" below the window. Both recovered inside the cab.
Replaced both windows and the window mechanism on the passenger side,
and drove the truck for about 150 K miles.
After 2 weeks, filled in the holes on the passenger side door, as the
whistling at highway speeds was annoying.
Now you know what Slick pilots went through..not to mention B17 pilots
in an earlier war


"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child,
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
PJ O'Rourke
RD Sandman
2014-12-18 18:27:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:13:29 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
Post by David J. Hughes
Post by rbowman
Post by David J. Hughes
The backdrop is the interior of the garage.
Depending on the construction of the garage, and the shot used, it
may well be perfectly reasonable and proper, as the shot has a
minimal chance of exiting the garage.
I believe his car was in the garage too and came out a little worse
for the wear.
Years ago I bought a 78 Ford F-250 that had been vandalized by some
git with a 12 gauge.
000 Buck into the passenger door. From the pattern, the shooter was
about 35 to 40 feet away.
6 pellets penetrated the outer steel of the door, one went through the
window glass on both passenger and driver sides.
4 were recovered inside the passenger door, having been stopped by
either the inner steel or window mechanism.
2 penetrated the fiberboard and plastic door panel, one that went
through the arm rest bounced off the steering column, leaving a small
dent, the other left a 3/8" deep dent in the inner steel of the
driver's door, about 2" below the window. Both recovered inside the
cab.
Replaced both windows and the window mechanism on the passenger side,
and drove the truck for about 150 K miles.
After 2 weeks, filled in the holes on the passenger side door, as the
whistling at highway speeds was annoying.
Now you know what Slick pilots went through..not to mention B17 pilots
in an earlier war
That's true. I knew of a couple WWII pilots who said the sound of the
wing whistling through those holes was somewhat comforting.....it let you
know that you were still alive.
--
Sleep well tonight.......

RD (The Sandman}

In these days and times, there is really only one race on this planet.
It is called "human". It just comes in many colors and sizes.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-14 22:14:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
http://missoulian.com/news/local/kaarma-s-partner-changes-story-says-teen-didn-t-plead/article_0048cba0-232f-59f3-8ec1-40ef34e6b9c4.html
Post by unknown
I'm surprised this one is not making the national news. This guy
knew kids were entering peoples' garages looking to heist some beer.
So instead of locking up he left his garage door wide open and waited
with a shotgun. He shot the kid four times in the dark. The last
(and lethal ) shot was aimed at the kid as he was running from the
garage. Now this Kaarma guy is claiming Castle Doctrine and just
how in fear he was for his life.
I hope they put this guy away for life.
Oh yea, and this Kaarma guy had been arrested three times in the past,
at least once for violent assault. And yet he was able to own guns.
This is more evidence why we need background checks.
That doesn't say anything about needing background checks.
And castle doctrine doesn't apply.
Dudu is easily confused.
Lamont Schlong
2014-12-14 22:12:30 UTC
Permalink
This is why you have to stay out of other peoples' garages.
Klaus Schadenfreude
2014-12-14 22:31:32 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:12:30 -0700, Lamont Schlong
Post by Lamont Schlong
This is why you have to stay out of other peoples' garages.
The defense says the students were part of a band of teenagers that
burglarized homes, and pressed Pazmino on why he broke Montana state
law. Pazmino repeatedly insisted that garage-hopping was a game.

Obviously, they were too stupid to know that you should stay out of
other people's garages.

Now they know.
Dustin
2014-12-15 18:06:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by unknown
I hope they put this guy away for life.
So far, based on what i've read; im inclined to agree with you. Sounds
like he set a trap and blasted the kid.
--
My truck does not leak. It's just marking its territory!
Loading...